Bug#301701: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7: System catatonic when tryingto write DVD or CD as user

2005-04-11 Thread Nick Hill
That should be debian kernel 2.6.11-3 which patches to 2.6.11.7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#301701: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7: System catatonic when tryingtowrite DVD or CD as user

2005-04-10 Thread Nick Hill
may break compatibility with older versions of cdrecord (such as that supplied with woody). Given that sarge will be using 2.6.8, this problem will, to the most part, be avoided. Nick Hill wrote: Everything I have checked points to the conclusion the version of CDrecord on my system is the curr

Bug#301701: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7: System catatonic when tryingtowrite DVD or CD as user

2005-04-10 Thread Nick Hill
maximilian attems wrote: > you don't seem to use the debian cdrecord package, try out, self compiled binaries are not supported by debian. debian's cdrecord -version shows an different input. if it still doesn't work, please provide full debian version with $ dpkg -l for example dpkg -l cdrecord

Bug#301701: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7: System catatonic when tryingtowrite DVD or CD as user

2005-04-09 Thread Nick Hill
maximilian attems wrote: which version of cdrecord or growisofs package are you using? Both are listed in both the Debian and kernel.org bug along with plenty of other info. Cdrecord-Clone 2.01.01a01 * growisofs by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, version 5.21 > cant duplicate your problem with 2.6.11 and n

Bug#301701: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7: System catatonic when trying to write DVD or CD as user

2005-04-01 Thread Nick Hill
I have compiled 2.6.11 with the latest kernel-image from svn. The problem still occurs with 2.6.11. Just a guess but Joerg Schilling maintains CDrecord and filed bug 301641 about kernel include files still inconsistent on sarge. Could this be related? Horms wrote: 2.6.10 isn't really being upd

Bug#301958: zile: Core features missing in v2

2005-03-30 Thread Nick Hill
Reuben Thomas wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Nick Hill wrote: I expect users who use zile as I do are familiar with nano, pico, mc etc. There are many reasons why I prefer Zile v1 as my primary text editor I can only apologise, then. That's not the niche I'm aiming to fill. Have you

Bug#301958: zile: Core features missing in v2

2005-03-29 Thread Nick Hill
Hello Reuben, thank you for the fast reply. Reuben Thomas wrote: For users wanting an easy-to-use editor with obvious up-front help, nano and others provide a much better option than Zile with its bizarre key bindings. I expect users who use zile as I do are familiar with nano, pico, mc etc. The