On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:28 PM Agathe Porte wrote:
>
> > Similarly, if the intent is to make some sort of distinction based on the
> > contents of the tables (e.g., GSUB and GPOS), then the filename extension
> > still isn't adequate, because .ttf files can and do include those tables
> > (see No
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 4:39 PM Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
> I'd say we make the distinction by container format. Though, I agree
> that this distinction is still pretty arbitrary.
>
But the container formats are the same, though: SFNT.
You can rename a foo.ttf file to foo.otf and it behaves exac
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:21 PM Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:21:29PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Julian Gilbey (2023-01-29 12:03:30)
> > > If you would like me to go ahead and work on this, please say.
> >
> > Sure I would like you to go ahead - why would I no
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 8:54 AM Mikko Rasa wrote:
> Recent versions of the ADF fonts contain an rlig (required ligatures) table
> which replaces the letters ae with æ and oe with œ. This is incorrect for
> at
> least Finnish and English and probably many other languages as well. I
> know
> Norw
Package: fonts-cardoVersion: 1.04-2Severity: seriousUser:
debian-fonts@lists.debian.orgUsertags: rfn-violation
license-violationX-Debbugs-CC: debian-fonts@lists.debian.orgYour
package contains a OFL font: Cardofonts-cardo:
usr/share/fonts/truetype/cardo/Cardoi99.ttfThis looks to be from
here:http:/
I've reported this upstream at
https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490
Nate
--
nathan.p.willis
6 matches
Mail list logo
