Bug#995781: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#995781: python-sqlsoup autopkgtest fails with SQLAlchemy 1.4.23+ds1-2

2021-11-16 Thread Mike Bayer
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021, at 12:19 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 08 Oct 2021 16:51:06 -0400 Mike Bayer wrote: > > > SQLSoup's repository is currently at > > https://github.com/zzzeek/sqlsoup > > > > However it has not been maintained for many years and wou

Bug#995781: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#995781: python-sqlsoup autopkgtest fails with SQLAlchemy 1.4.23+ds1-2

2021-10-08 Thread Mike Bayer
you woujld have better luck changing epigrass to use automap instead: https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/14/orm/extensions/automap.html On Fri, Oct 8, 2021, at 5:08 PM, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Control: tag -1 upstream help > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/zzzeek/sqlsoup/issues/1 > > H

Bug#995781: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#995781: python-sqlsoup autopkgtest fails with SQLAlchemy 1.4.23+ds1-2

2021-10-08 Thread Mike Bayer
Hi Étienne - SQLSoup's repository is currently at https://github.com/zzzeek/sqlsoup However it has not been maintained for many years and would not be expected to work with modern versions of SQLAlchemy. Feel free to remove it from your distributions. - mike On Fri, Oct 8, 2021, at 4:22

Bug#929321: unblock: sqlalchemy/1.2.18+ds1-2 (CVE-2019-7164 CVE-2019-7548)

2019-05-30 Thread Mike Bayer
On 5/30/19 5:23 AM, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Mike, zigo, Thanks for your replies, I very much think it's safer to just allow SQLAchemy to migrate right now, to fix the potential SQL insertion vulnerability, rather than waiting for any (potential, but likely rare) issue in the above reverse depe

Bug#929321: unblock: sqlalchemy/1.2.18+ds1-2 (CVE-2019-7164 CVE-2019-7548)

2019-05-29 Thread Mike Bayer
to Piotr to do the work. I'm > happily replying though. :) > > I'm CC-ing Piotr and Mike Bayer (upstream for SQLAlchemy). > > On 5/28/19 8:59 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed > > > > Hi Zigo, > > > > On Tue, 21 May