Bug#883527: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#883527: Heartbeat / Debian 9: Missing directory "/var/run/resource-agents"

> Package: heartbeat > Version: 1:3.0.6-5 on Debian 9 > > This directory should be created on boot by: > > /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/heartbeat.conf > > But perhaps this host is not using systemd? Hi Valentin, thanks for taking a look at this! You're right: there is an entry in /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d

Bug#883827: zstd / Debian 9: gzip file cannot be uncompressed

Package: zstd Version: 1.1.2-1 on Debian 9 zstd is able to uncompress gziped files - and zstd is at least 30% faster than gzip. Unfortunately, zstd on Debian 9 aborts with the error message below: > zstd -d file.gz zstd: gzip file cannot be uncompressed (zstd compiled without ZSTD_GZDECOM

Bug#883527: Heartbeat / Debian 9: Missing directory "/var/run/resource-agents"

Package: heartbeat Version: 1:3.0.6-5 on Debian 9 Although it is recommended to install Heartbeat together with Pacemaker and Corosync, it is possible to install Heartbeat without Pacemaker and Corosync. In the latter case, heartbeat is not able to activcate a service IP address using IPaddr (IPad

Bug#601328: wavesurfer: Unable to use with libsnack2-alsa (provides libsnack2) as it depends on versioned libsnack2

Package: wavesurfer Version: 1.8.5-2ubuntu2~mh1 Severity: important Wavesurfer Depends: libsnack2 (>= 2.2) which makes it impossibe to use with libsnack2-alsa, which although it Provides: libsnack2 does not work with wavesurfer as the wavesurfer dependency is versioned. Als libsnack2 is using

Bug#577031: xpdf: scrolling is very slow on i386 (gcc regression between 4.3 and 4.4?)

You're right. I had the (errant) assumption, that if a floating point comparison goes wrong, it goes wrong the same way every time. "-ffloat-store" seem to work, but the comparison is indeed very fragile. Patching the two floating point comparisons (zoom and dpi) might be best. Michael

Bug#487715: /dev/fuse is not owned by group fuse on 2.6.25

Am 24.06.2008, 20:54 Uhr, schrieb Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Jun 24, Michael Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Had the same problem on 2.6.24-1 and udev 0.114-2. Solved it by adding line: KERNEL=="fuse", NAME="%k" This i

Bug#487715: /dev/fuse is not owned by group fuse on 2.6.25

Had the same problem on 2.6.24-1 and udev 0.114-2. Solved it by adding line: KERNEL=="fuse", NAME="%k" to /etc/udev/udev.rules . Now, the already exisiting line: KERNEL=="fuse", GROUP="fuse" in /etc/udev/permissions.rules seems to take effe