1 jan 2010 kl. 18:41 skrev Jelmer Vernooij:
> Package: heimdal
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Please export the following symbols:
>
> * free_Salt
> * initialize_hdb_error_table_r
> * GSS_KRB5_CRED_NO_CI_FLAGS_X
> * kdc_check_flags
>
> These symbols are required for Samba 4 to build ag
30 apr 2008 kl. 23.39 skrev Russ Allbery:
Love Hörnquist Åstrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
How about using libtool ? Can you test this patch ?
http://www.h5l.org/fisheye/changelog/heimdal/?cs=23146
Yup, this works, although it produces a bunch of spurious output in
the
middle
To provide a bit of additional information (I should have pasted in
the
config.log output as well), the existing check fails on x86_64
because it
uses -shared to link the test object but doesn't use -fPIC. This
works on
x86, but other platforms, such as x86_64, require all objects that
You can use AFS support in heimdal (both KDC and client) in 0.7 without any
kerberos 4 support.
Please drop Kerberos 4, and leave it to the archeologists.
Love
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A tantalizing suggestion. I've wished several times already for the krb4
> source package to go away, but it's still here. >:) The only packages in
> Debian which build-depend on it are heimdal, and cyrus-sasl2, so it's
> obviously not *widely* used,
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:11:18PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
>>
>> So, if this is correct (my guess is you are correct), does this mean
>> this bug is an upstream bug in Heimdal and not a bug in openssl?
>>
>> I read bug report #333101 yesterday
>> http:/
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is no kernel AFS support in the Hurd yet (though this issue might
> have stirred up some interest to write a translator for it), so the
> syscalls in afssys.c fail.
>
> I am not sure what should be done in the generic case (I saw there is
> some c
The patch submited is missing many free()s and contains errors like like
this:
-char host[MAXHOSTNAMELEN];
+char *host;
snprintf(host, sizeof(host), "%s.%s", instance, p);
I agree with that removing limits are good, but the patch needs more
tweeking and jacque is right, xgethostna
8 matches
Mail list logo
