The specific bashism I encountered is the '==' vs '=' with "[" (a.k.a. "test")
, as mentioned in the Ubuntu Wiki DashAsBinSh page.
The checkbashim script didn't catch it, but did catch several others of the
sort and some other suspected bashisms.
Here's what I expected.
$ keychain --list
SHA2
NMU, please.
Yes.
On Jun 5, 2015 10:40 AM, arec...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is iptables still maintained?
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:40:00PM +, arec...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Is iptables still maintained?
Yes and the bug is confirmed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2015-01-23 05:11, Riku Voipio wrote:
To allow cross-arch installations of packages depending on iptables,
a foreign stanza is needed. This was one requirement to install
armhf docker.io packages to a arm64 system.
NMU it, please.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.
iptables 1.4.8's iptables and iptables-restore give a warning[1] and
its iptables-save writes the negation correctly. The ip6 variants do
too. A package installation warning for wheezy sounds reasonable.
[1] Using intrapositioned negation (`--option ! this`) is deprecated
in favor of extraposition
https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/iptables/ip6tables-restore.c?id=f1c668268e9ddaedd8d78d7ae44cd26db1e8469f
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Seems like too much effort to be intentional, actually. I should leave
this to the pros. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
The patch applies if I clear the lines following @@. The code change
intentionally makes everything use a static "smtpd" instead of the
descriptive names like "scheduler", "queue" and "lookup". That is
technically fixed, but somewhat disappointing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-r
Package: opensmtpd
Version: 5.3.3p1-3
Tags: upstream
re: https://github.com/poolpOrg/OpenSMTPD/issues/239
I see now. The git tree I cloned from github has no openbsd-compat
sub-directory. It's unfortunate that the closed tickets don't have
links to the commits.
I'll give this a try later.
On S
Package: opensmtpd
Version: 5.3.3p1-2
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Sending mail fails on btrfs systems:
Sep 20 19:44:09 nymn ue[23033]: warn: not enough inodes: 0% left
Sep 20 19:44:09 nymn ue[23033]: warn: temporarily rejecting messages
This was fixed upstream in commit 7145d4c596. The (
What error and how do you produce it?
Why is there a stated limit of version 1.4.20 and lower?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I couldn't get iptables-apply to fail with unresolvable DNS while
using multiple tables. I had to insert DNS names manually because
iptables resovles domain names at rule insertion and iptables-save
doesn't display any DNS names.
I haven't managed to get iptables-apply to fail. I also haven't foun
Package: libnetfilter-conntrack3
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: wishlist
File: libnetfilter-conntrack
Dear Maintainer,
It would be nice to have 1.0.4 so I can build iptables with connlabel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
Date: Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iptables: iptables calls setsockopt incorrectly
To: "Laurence J. Lane"
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
Hi Laurence,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:25:46PM -0400
tag 718810 -moreinfo
tag 718810 upstream
severity 718810 important
thanks
BTW, the state match has been deprecated in favor of conntrack with
ctstate, which doesn't have the same affliction you've reported.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Eugene Berdnikov wrote:
> If rules are created with iptables-1.4.14, followed by upgrade to
> iptables-1.4.19, then "iptables -L" and iptables-save show wrong
> results. Below is the log on debian/testing fresh system.
Confirmed. Looking for a solution.
--
-- Forwarded message --
From: Laurence J. Lane
Date: Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: Bug#718810: iptables 1.4.19.1: -m state output is broken
To: Eugene Berdnikov
tag 718810 moreinfo
severity 718810 normal
thanks
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Eugene Berdnikov
That doesn't happen on my systems, but I'll look into it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:30 PM, podo wrote:
> :INPUT DROP [57:9652]
Note: any packets that have not been sent elsewhere get dropped at the
end of the chain
> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [2421:151014]
> -A INPUT -p icmp -m icmp --icmp-type 8 -m limit --limit 1/sec -j ACCEPT
Note: A
Five is not reasonable. Zero day it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.20.14-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainers,
Some are waiting patiently for 2.20.0, which supports the shiny new Intel
Haswell integrated graphics. For the impatient, like me, the solo experimental
package works fine.
Note on kernel i915 driver's
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> iptables -A INPUT -m state --state UNTRACKED -j DROP
-m conntrack --ctstate UNTRACKED
I'm unsure of the SNAT thing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
severity 691306 wishlist
thanks
The multiple rules thing is an iptables feature and not a bug. One could
argue for iptables to filter out duplicate IP addresses, but that's more of
a wishlist than actual bug.
The gethostbyname() duplicate remains a mystery to me for now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
iptables is supposed to write a rule for each of a hostname's IP
addresses. "iptables -A INPUT --source www.google.com" gives me six
rules for the six IP addresses. Adding "--source www.google.com" bumps
that up to thirty-six rules.
I'm uncertain of the issue with duplicate addresses for localhost
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iptables
Added a patch from upstream that fixes an issue with iptables
compiled with gcc-4.7.
unblock iptables/1.4.14-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: whe
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Laurence J. Lane wrote:
> I neglected to import the NMU that fixed that.
And to close this in the changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I neglected to import the NMU that fixed that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff
wrote:
> Package: iptables
> Severity: important
> Tags: security
>
> Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826702 for details.
"Only match TCP packets with the SYN bit set and the ACK,RST and FIN
bits cleared"
Going by that d
That error was reported numerous times and fixed some time ago.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
try 1.4.13-1.1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Relevant part:
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/utils'
>> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `check'.
>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/utils'
>> Making check in extensions
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/extensions'
>> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `ch
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Laurence J. Lane"
* Package name: libnetfilter_acct
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Pablo Neira Ayuso
* URL : http://www.netfilter.org/projects/libnetfilter_acct/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Laurence J. Lane"
* Package name: nfacct
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Pablo Neira Ayuso
* URL :
http://www.netfilter.org/projects/libnetfilter_acct/downloads.html
* License : GPL
Programmi
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: iptables
> Version: 1.4.12-1
> Severity: important
>
> Please enable hardened build flags for your package. Since your
> package has already been converted to dh, setting debian/compat
> to 9 is all you need to do.
>
> I've tes
You filed a bug on iptables, but you're writing about kernel a feature.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Orphaned.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.6
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
wrote:
> PS: My understanding was, that you would prefer to add /etc/e16 to the
> searchpath for config files of e16 itself; as you can see I haven't
> implemented that, but tried to fix "my" symlinks. I thought that would
> be the prefe
Remove it or NMU. No delay is necessary.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Jan-Pascal van Best
wrote:
> Upgrading to squeeze does help:
Sorry. Didn't realize you're using Lenny. You're probably
out of luck unless backports does iptables and a kernel
with support for the ipv6 version of recent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Amr Ali wrote:
> libip6t_recent.so is missing which renders the recent
> match unusable with ip6tables.
I don't recall libip6t_recent.so ever existing. IPv6 support was
added well after the shift to libxt_*.so and libxt_recent.so is
included.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hello.
>
> We should really have gettext 0.18.1.1 in squeeze. So, I announce my
> intent to NMU this package an apply the proposed patch.
>
> I plan to upload the package this weekend. If you still want to upload
> the package yourself, pleas
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Travis Crump wrote:
> I would suggest you reupload 1.0.0-3 as 1.0.0-4 as the
> NMU was clearly broken.
I agree with everything else, but unfortunately this isn't entirely
simple. I'll have to script logic to deal with any changes a user
may have already made to f
reassign 569743 feh
thanks
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira
wrote:
> Today after upgrading libimlib2 from 1.4.2-5 to 1.4.2-6:
>
> $ feh image.jpg
> feh WARNING: image.jpg - No Imlib2 loader for that file format
> feh - No loadable images specified.
> Use feh --help for deta
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira
wrote:
> Probably it's related with building it with libjpeg8-dev?
Yes. It's a mess I made trying to clean up after another mess a NMU dropped in
my lap. Working on it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.or
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Attached is a patch which I believe fixes this problem. Maybe debconf
> should be used to prompt instead of bailing out if there are unexpected
> files, but this is probably good enough.
I have an uneasy feeling about using a symlinked
Send a patch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Denis Rolland wrote:
> Package: libimlib2-dev
> Version: 1.4.2-5
>
> This package does not seems to contains header files for imlib2.
ljl...@absolom:~$ dpkg -L libimlib2-dev | grep .h$
/usr/include/Imlib2.h
> The provided utility for cflags : imlib2-config, doe
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> I am not sure if that bug is severity serious (policy relevant) or
> minor so I set it to normal.
> The changelog is created by 0101-changelog.patch which is from
> version 1.4.5 so not helpfull at all.
> Please update the changelog with ne
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Anders Fugmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I also observe that iptables ignores mask specification on source or
> destination options. The problem is observed when replacing rules. Eg.
That's fixed in 1.4.6, which I'll roll out shortly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> This bug should *NOT* be closed.
That's debatable. I believe it should be closed and I closed it.
> Getting a deprecation warning for a simple and common use of
> iptables is a bug somewhere, either in iptables or the kernel.
You certai
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 8:03 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
e16 is essentially forked code and a new package based on
enlightenment. e16 isn't a drop-in replacement for enlightenment
0.16x. It's actually intended to not interfere with enlightenment.
The configuration files are not compatible, but some o
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:01 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> ping?
Lagged pong.
Heavily slacking.
I'll move on this and have an update within a week.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Kim Woelders wrote:
> I suspect this is a bug in the debian packaging.
The actual bug would probably be the lack of a
/usr/share/applications/e16.desktop in the package. I wonder where
the bug submitter acquired his.
> The Type in /usr/share/applications/e16.des
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Upgrade to 1.4.4 - it will print a better error message than "(null)".
Ah. Sanjoy used "--days" instead of "--weekdays" and iptables 1.4.2
offered a less than useful error message.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lis
What just happened?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Mark Hobley wrote:
> There appears to be traffic leaking across iptables when a
> long chain of valid ip addresses are used.
That would be the kernel and not iptables.
(So tempting to quote all 3425 and bottom-reply ...)
That doesn't look like the entire config
retitle 53627 [nop] iptables -S generates deprecated command lines
severity 523627 minor
thanks
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:28 AM, wrote:
> It would be nice if iptables agreed with itself on the preferred format. :-)
With 1.4.3.2-1, it does.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Laurence J. Lane"
* Package name: nftables
Version : 0.01-alpha1
Upstream Author : Patrick McHardy
* URL :
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : packet administration tool for kerne
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Anthony Havé
wrote:
> Package: iptables
> Version: 1.4.2
>
> Hello,
>
> I work on Debian Lenny (5.0) with kernel 2.6.26
> When I use the following command:
> iptables-save > ./file-iptables
>
> It return this:
> iptables-save v1.4.2 Unable to open /proc/net/ip_tabl
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
> Please consider being more nice to backporters in the future and
> refrain from using unstable/testing only tools, especially when a
> well-supported, backwards-compatible scheme is still available.
> Thanks for considering this in the future.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> apologies for misspelling your name in my communication of this bug
> report. Nonetheless I would suggest to not drop the security bug fix for
> #505714. Generally, it might be a good idea to make a habit out of
> incorporating NMUs as per
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian happened to patch in ipt_connlimit into their
> iptables 1.3.6 and kernel 2.6.18. And they (logically) did
> not do so for 2.6.24, because xt_connlimit is included since
> then.
Debian's iptables included various p
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Soren Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I glanced at the offending docs, and -- at a glance at
> least -- they look to be valid still.
Some parts are no longer valid and the additions since
2.4 are not included, of course. Changing the title and
description to s
severity 495045 normal
retitle 495045 [kernel] iptables: Error inserting ip_queue: Device or
resource busy
thanks
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:01 AM, murz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I try to install module ip_queue to iptables, I see the error:
> srv:~# modprobe ip_queue
> FATAL: Error insert
tag 493440 pending
thanks
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Daniel Schepler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From my pbuilder build log, using a chroot with /bin/sh -> dash:
[...]
> Making install in howtos
> make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/iptables-1.4.1.1/howtos'
> test -d /tmp/buildd/ipta
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Orphaning sillypoker
Description: A poker game
silly Poker is an advanced poker game with support for a single player
against 1-4 computer opponents in five card draw, five card stud, and seven
card stud poker games.
.
The program in this package contains sup
Package: enlightenment
enlightenment has been replaced by e16, so please remove it.
Thanks,
Laurence
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Orphaning dnotify.
Description: Execute a command when the contents of a directory change
dnotify is a simple program based on Linux kernel 2.4.19+'s dnotify
API. dnotify can execute a specified command each time the content
of a specific directory changes. It i
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the scrot package.
The package description is:
scrot (SCReen shOT) is a simple commandline screen capture
utility that uses imlib2 to grab and save images. Multiple
image formats are supported through imlib2's dynamic saver
modules.
--
To
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the feh package.
The package description is:
feh is a fast, lightweight image viewer which uses imlib2. It is
commandline-driven and supports multiple images through
slideshows, thumbnail browsing or multiple windows, and montages
or index pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the libast package and eterm.
The package description is:
LibAST is the Library of Assorted Spiffy Things. It contains many
spiffy things, and it is a library. Thus, the ever-so-creative name.
LibAST has been previously known as libmej, the
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the eterm package and libast.
The package description is:
A terminal emulator in the spirit of xterm or rxvt, eterm uses an
Enlightenment style config file, as well as themes. The Imlib2 graphics
engine is used to render images. This version
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which should be enough to justify a security upload without
> waiting for further maintainer action in my opinion.
For the record, I believe the fact that it is a security bug
(especially one complemented with a CVE) is just
tag 482502 pending
thanks
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Patryk Cisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fix is simple, linux-headers-2.6.25-1-common needs to be changed to
> linux-headers-2.6.25-2-common in Build-Depends. In an attachment there's a
> patch that fixes the problem.
If you look at
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as the maintainer of imlib2 is MIA I'm going to upload a
> 0-day NMU.
Thanks for the NMU, but the 12 hour stretch from your initial report
until the NMU is quite far from stating someone is MIA.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Ignore the last comment. The bug is fix and remains closed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no /dev/disk/by-label/ entries created for /dev/mapper
devices with etch's udev 0.105-4 as well.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kexec-tools
Version: 20070330-4
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/man/man8/kexec.8.gz
kexec(8):
Note: Compressed kernel images such as bzImage are not supported
by kexec. Use the uncompressed vmlinux.
This appears to be out of date because support is available for
compressed kerne
On 8/20/07, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, Laurence J. Lane wrote:
> >> Looks like either we need a fix to the documentation, or the other .so
> >> file for ipv6?
> >
> > What documentation?
>
> man ip6tables
> (the TC
On 11/6/06, Matthew Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem with the iptables man page has not been resolved. I stumbled
across this bug after reading the man page and trying to use the mport
option:
The difference between mport and multiport was the addition of ranges
to the former, wh
reopen 397371
quit
sarge needs these updates for src/modules/loaders/*.c
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/i/imlib2/imlib2_1.2.1-2ubuntu1.2.diff.gz
Upstream CVS appears to contain additional fixes for imlib2 1.3.0.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
On 11/7/06, Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thanks for you quick response.
Ubuntu released a revised version of their USN. If you took the patches
from the original USN you might want to check what they changed.
Oddly enough, I was pulling some patches from upstream CVS for the
TI
reopen 381216
quit, thanks
My error. I'll try to get these patches integrated upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/19/06, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not have to include any patch-o-matic extensions.
Yes, of course, but you did in the past, so your latest policy change
has introduced a regression for your users. I think it is within their
rights to ask you for a better explanation t
severity 93138 wishlist
thanks
None of the reasons you listed justifies a bug severity of important; however,
you'll probably see 1.3.6 in etch depending on the freeze schedule.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One month has passed and the freeze get closer.
Did you make any progress ?
Does time ever fly...
I'll upload what I have really soon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On 9/26/06, Shane Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kernel-patch-wrr is available in current debian feeds.. however the wrr
iptables patch or modules for iptables are missing. What are the
possibilities of the package maintainer for iptables incorporating this into
the iptables source package
Disregard that last comment.
Maybe I'll make a man page entry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/6/06, Laurence J. Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
retitle 277150 [noop] iptables: poor error message (and perhaps more)
thanks, control
Sorry. There wasn't much to go by here. Reopen or file a new
report if necessary.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On 9/4/06, Alan Woodland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the current status of this bug? Have you any plans to upload
0.9.4 soon? If you need any help preparing this upload feel free to give
me a shout - I'd like to see Eterm release with Etch.
Waiting on a diff from upstream for libscream'
tag 370652 pending
thanks
On 6/6/06, Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In comment of /usr/share/doc/iptables/examples/oldinitdscript.gz:
#3. Controlling the script itself is done through runlevels configured
# with debconf for package installation. Run "dpkg-reconfigure
On 5/30/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've send you a patch to fix this bug on 05 Mar 2005 when I reported
it and again on 05 Apr 2006. Are you unwilling to fix this bug?
(sorry, web browser behaving badly)
I'm having problems problems packaging the long overdue upstream
On 5/30/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've send you a patch to fix this bug on 05 Mar 2005 when I reported
it and again on 05 Apr 2006. Are you unwilling to fix this bug?
I have rather serious issues to address with the package at the moment.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 5/13/06, James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On my system, the Debian/apps/graphics menu has 27 entries. When
Enlightenment tries to display it, the lower end falls off the screen.
Toggle "Always pop up menus on screen" in the Special FX Settings.
On 1/27/06, Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The string match in iptables on current 2.6.x kernels needs iptables
> 1.3.4 apparently. I've built updated packages more than one month ago
> and put them on http://people.debian.org/~erich/iptables-1.3.4/
> They seem to work fine for me, YM
On 1/25/06, Jefferson Cowart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
retitle 349943 [rejected] iptables: ROUTE and CONNMARK options don't
seem to work
thanks, control
> The CONNMARK and ROUTE targets for the mangle table don't appear to
> work. I have the iptable_mangle module loaded, but when I try to add a
What happens when USAGI is slow with an update to a newer
iptables package? What if USAGI falls off the planet? What
if the netfilter team implements ipv6 connection tracking
that is not compatible with usagi's? There are numerous
uncertainties and upstream is usually the best place to get
things s
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 08:02:09PM -0600, Laurence J. Lane wrote:
> Using plain AC_PATH_XTRA_CORRECTED works fine here. It's
> a Debian hack, but so is the AC_PATH_X macro that accepts
> arguments.
Funny thing is _CORRECTED doesn't appear to exist anymore.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
The patch provided fails. Search for "no X support found"
in http://people.debian.org/~ljlane/stuff/295350-B0.bz2
if you want to see the details.
Using this line from the imlib2 changelog causes a different
configure failure:
AC_PATH_X([X11],[X11/Xlib.h],[XrmInitialize()]
Using plain AC_PATH_X
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
