Package: libopenblas64-openmp-dev
Version: 0.3.13+ds-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: juanjose.garciarip...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I try to use OpenBLAS in various open software
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer to keep the ECL situation as it is now: Debian ships only one
> version, which is the latest release [1].
Luca, I think you are thinking too way ahead. Currently, there is no Debian
program that depends on an sp
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:38:13 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> > Last change in CVS ( 2008/09/09 )
> >
> > - We switch to an Ubuntu-like versioning system, based on
> $(year).$(month)
Last change in CVS ( 2008/09/09 )
- We switch to an Ubuntu-like versioning system, based on
$(year).$(month).x
where "x" is 0 for a release or any higher number for a patched version.
- In Unix-type systems, ECL now installs with a "soname" and using
versioned
directory names, such as /us
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, I really think SONAME's decision belongs to developers, not to
> > package maintainers. Let's say that Debian uses a SONAME of 0.1 while
> > Ubuntu 0.2 [1]: then every effort done with the LSB [2] is lost.
>
>
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That is not something ECL has to provide. It is more a configuration
>> option that operating systems may provide.
>
> Sorry, I'm not a skilled programmed, but I don't understand why this is
> not ECL task: ECL provides the
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This bug has nothing to do with the rpath issue (now solved [1]).
> Thus, the problem remains: is there any particular reason for
> /usr/lib/libecl.so not providing a SONAME?
That is not something ECL has to provide. It is
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the ECL list: this is a 'serious' bug in the Debian BTS [1]. For
> the reason why rpath is considered harmful by Debian see [2] and [3].
ECL does not use rpath. The "guessing" of how it works is still in the
autoconf
Package:libc6.1
Version:2.2.5-11.5
Architecture: Linux usf-cf-alpha-linux-1 2.2.20 #2 Wed Mar 20 19:57:28 EST
2002 alpha unknown
Summary:Under some circumstances, invoking fesetenv() results
in a floating point exception being raised.
Description:
I have
Package:libc6.1
Version:2.2.5-11.5
Summary:Under some circumstances, invoking fesetenv() results
in a floating point exception being raised.
Description:
I have a piece of code which may result in underflows. I enclose
the code in between
fenv_t e
10 matches
Mail list logo
