Bug#829310: systemd unit file breaks imapd

On 08/30/2016 06:35 PM, Mark - Syminet wrote: The systemd unit file, or something in this patch is causing imapproxy to randomly timeout and die, see following thread at upstream mailing list: https://sourceforge.net/p/squirrelmail/mailman/squirrelmail-imapproxy/thread/bf5ac0ec-e309-ee5c-70e1-1

Bug#817550: Any news?

On 06/21/2016 12:34 PM, Michael Meskes wrote: Any news on this? I don't like seeing my packages removed from testing because of this. Obviously I'd be willing to sponsor (or NMU) if needed. Either is fine with me, to be honest. The changes needed are fairly minimal for libsieve, AFAIK. (thank

Bug#817550: libsieve: Removal of debhelper compat 4

On 03/09/2016 09:30 PM, ni...@thykier.net wrote: Source: libsieve Severity: important Usertags: compat-4-removal Sponsor requested. Hi, The package libsieve uses debhelper with a compat level of 4, which is deprecated and scheduled for removal. * Please bump the debhelper compat at your e

Bug#817312: bison++: Mandatory debian/compat for debhelper

On 03/09/2016 08:07 PM, ni...@thykier.net wrote: Source: bison++ Severity: important Usertags: mandatory-debian-compat Need someone to sponsor the upload, and I'll get it done. Hi, The package bison++ uses debhelper but does not have a debian/compat file. * Please add a debian/compat file

Bug#806946: Acknowledgement (bindgraph doesn't show any graphic)

On 12/03/2015 12:15 PM, Stéphane CHIRON wrote: I have found a strange directory related to bind graph : /var/cache/bindgraph/,cgi-bin,bindgraph.cgi Huh? Are those COMMAS ? Doesn't look like made by the package

Bug#664393: Bug#607725: upload/NMU of libsmbios-2.2.28 to experimental

On 12/20/2012 05:15 AM, tony mancill wrote: Hello Jose Luis and Loic, I have prepared an updated libsmbios package of the most recent upstream release and would like to propose uploading it to experimental. I also have imported all of the Debian releases of the package into a git packaging repo

Bug#607725: Fwd: Processed: retitle 607725 to libsmbios has had no new upstream version since october 2008

Indeed. Any (direct) sponsors are welcome. Original Message Subject: Processed: retitle 607725 to libsmbios has had no new upstream version since october 2008 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:42:03 + From: ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor

Bug#642172: ITP: likewise-open -- Authentication services for Active Directory Domains

lenios wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Richard Sellam > > > * Package name: likewise-open > Version : 6.1.0.406 > * URL : http://www.likewiseopen.org/ > * License : GPL version 3 > Description : Authentication services for Active Directo

Bug#583528: libconfig9 packaging

Tobias Frost wrote: > Hallo, > > is there any update on the libconfig9 packaging? > Awaiting uploader. Any help appreciated. > BTW: Is it not possible to have libconfig8 and libconfig9 co-existing? > Is the transition a must? > They can co-exist without problems. The limitation is that you

Bug#622445: libsieve: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs

codeh...@debian.org wrote: > Package: libsieve > Version: 2.2.6-1 > Severity: normal > User: codeh...@debian.org > Usertags: la-file-removal > > [snip] > libsieve appears in this list as a source package because one or more > of the binary packages (usually -dev packages) contain .la files. > N

Bug#612296: O: bacula

John Goerzen wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > Co-maintainers (specially with upload ability) wanted. Bacula is still much useful even with just disk-based volumes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Bug#505756: Antec fusion LCD should be supported by lcdproc 0.5.3

Dominique Dumont wrote: > Hello > > According to https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=98389 , the LCD > display for Antec box can work using imonlcd driver. > > This driver is available in lcdproc 0.5.3. (note that I have not yet tried) > > May be it's time to update sid's package ? > Sur

Bug#607725: BUG REPORT : Debian package LIBSMBIOS2 hasn't been updated for 2 years

Loïc Minier wrote: > It's been a long while I didn't hear about libsmbios; I have been > sponsoring it based on sourceful changes, but I don't actually have > hardware to test it, so I wasn't confortable with the latest large > changes which came up last time I was poke about it (but that was a

Bug#607725: BUG REPORT : Debian package LIBSMBIOS2 hasn't been updated for 2 years

Aurelien Lemaire wrote: > [snip] > > Assuming you 're all busy as "squeeze" coming soon, i won't be too > pushy but libsmbios2 hasn't been maintained for the last 2 years and > now got the deprecated 2.0.3 version for any Debian distro (stable, > testing and unstable ). > At the same time, the upst

Bug#512369: fails to configure when an IMAP server is not available

severity #512369 normal tags #512369 +patch thanks Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > Hi, > > [snip] > How about calling dh_installinit with "--no-start" and manually calling > "invoke-rc.d imapproxy start || true" on fresh installs? Possibly > throwing a warning? > I just think its unnecessary to bot

Bug#597208: bindgraph: fails to install

Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi José, > > feel free to prepare the upload and ping me for sponsoring. It could be > worth asking advance permission to Release Team, though. > Since it is marked as RC and doesn't introduce any code changes, it shouldn't be necessary. I will send the diff to -release a

Bug#597208: bindgraph: fails to install

Holger Levsen wrote: > Package: bindgraph > Version: 0.2a-5 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per > definition of the release team this makes the package too

Bug#594620: Please switch to standard flex

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: bison++ > Severity: important > > bison++ is the only remaining package in the archive still using flex-old > instead of the standard flex package. Please check, whether you can migrate > your package to the standard flex package. > It is actually out of main

Bug#591601: bindgraph: diff for NMU version 0.2a-5.1

Georges Khaznadar wrote: > tags 591601 + patch > tags 591601 + pending > thanks > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for bindgraph (versioned as 0.2a-5.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. > Please sponsor an upload proper instead

Bug#586506: libconfig++8-dev: libconfig-1.4.5 upstream provides ready-to-build debian package

Romain Bossart wrote: > Hyperrealm's libconfig-1.4.5 already has debian/ folder, and building it with > dpkg-buildpackage is really straightforward. The i386 and amd64 packages are > valid. To me, it looks like pushing it into debian require minimal work. > Please > note that the package will be

Bug#579059: lcdproc: USB drivers not being built

Hi, Nick Nick Leverton wrote: > [snip] > > I've actually built a package based on 0.5.3 which fixes this (and hence > a number of other USB driver requests in the BTS here). I created this > package myself as I needed 0.5.3 for compatibility with an embedded > system I am working on. I need to t

Bug#563786: fails to install due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header

Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Hi. Any progress with this upload/sponsoring? Would be nice to have > this issue fixed in testing soon. :) > Indeed. The upload is ready, but found no sponsors yet. Any upload-capable one reading this is welcome to sponsor. J.L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Bug#571307: mysql-server: security update changes dabian-sys-maint access rights

Hi, Erik Auerswald wrote: > Package: mysql-server > Version: 5.0.51a-24+lenny3 > Severity: important > (not downgrading since I'm not the maintainer; One thinks it should be 'wishlist' instead) > We use the debian-sys-maint account for maintenance tasks, e.g. the daily > database backup. Theref

Bug#570631: Some changes to Debian package to attemp building upstream version 2.2.19

Olivier Berger wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:10:25PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: > >> Btw, there's a new version upstream that may fix the existing build problems. >> >> > > FYI, I've tried and apply the libsmbios_2.0.3.dfsg-1.diff.gz source package > to the upstream 2.2.19 sources

Bug#536742: Patch for the 1.2.6-5.1 NMU of up-imapproxy

Christian PERRIER wrote: > Dear maintainer of up-imapproxy, > > On Wednesday, February 10, 2010 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to > upload a > NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial > notice sent on Friday, February 05, 2010. > Updated version of the pack

Bug#505589: Availability of libsmbios in Debian ?

Olivier Berger wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 03:42:26PM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: > >> usertags 505589 awaiting-sponsor >> A new version is being tested right now. >> >> Anyone cares to sponsor it ? >> > > It seems that libsmbios won&#x

Bug#563786: bindgraph fails to install due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header

Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi, > > [snip] > >> The problem being that upstream author, Marco D'Itri, does not agree >> with bindgraph being packaged for Debian. >> Some time ago, I had to repackage bindgraph source (that's where the 'a' >> suffix comes from) to include the changes with respect to the

Bug#563786: bindgraph fails to install due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header

Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 20:45:48 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: > > >> Mh, I thought Lenny's dpkg does support format 3.0 (quilt)? >> > > lenny's dpkg does (sort of, there were some bugs that should be fixed > with the next point release afaik), but dak won't accept 3.0

Bug#563786: bindgraph fails to install due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header

Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi Jose, > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:01:44AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: > >> Evgeni Golov wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >> There is a fixed package awaiting sponsoring. >> Sent to -mentors more than a week ag

Bug#563786: bindgraph fails to install due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header

Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi, > There is a fixed package awaiting sponsoring. Sent to -mentors more than a week ago, with no responses so far. It also includes some needed enhancements / updates. > I have looked at the issue, and it seems that the bind9 dependency is > useless. We can start before

Bug#566022: mysql-server: mysqld fails to start

stor...@club-internet.fr wrote: > Package: mysql-server > Version: 5.1.41 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > Please provide the output from the command below: $ objdump -T /usr/sbin/mysqld | grep sort_order_hebrew It might as well be some kind of problem during upg

Bug#505589: Processed: severity of 505589 is serious

tags 505589 + pending usertags 505589 awaiting-sponsor thanks Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> severity 505589 serious >> > Bug #505589 [libsmbios] FTBFS with GCC 4.4: missing #include > Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > A

Bug#506933: ping

Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > I'd suggest to keep the code at > http://alioth.debian.org/projects/collab-maint/ > There hasn't been much interest from other parties, and I haven't had the time to finish the ITP yet -- fixing bugs in other packages comes first. This said, if anybody really doe

Bug#554582: libsmbios_2.0.3.dfsg-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: matching constraint does not allow a register

lam...@debian.org wrote: > Package: libsmbios > Version: 2.0.3.dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > A new version of libsmbios is in preparation. J.L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a su

Bug#553704: O: flex-old

Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > I am not using it, am no longer intrerested in developing it, and it > will take too much effort to bring it up to my standards. It has a > single reverse depends, bison++ > flex-old is just a "recommends" :-) Moreover, bison++ is m

Bug#544321: [Fwd: Bug#544321: libsmbios-bin: dellWirelessCtl reports incorrect rfkill information]

CC'ing submitter, dropping "forwarded" michael_e_br...@dell.com wrote: > Does dellWirelessCtl work properly from earlier versions, such as 0.13.13? > -- > Michael > > -Original Message- > From: José Luis Tallón [mailto:jltal...@adv-solutions.net] &g

Bug#479402: marked as done (kchmviewer: package Qt4 port (4.0 beta 2 released) in experimental)

Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Your message dated Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:05:12 + > with message-id > and subject line Bug#479402: fixed in kchmviewer 4.1-1 > has caused the Debian Bug report #479402, > regarding kchmviewer: package Qt4 port (4.0 beta 2 released) in experimental > to be marke

Bug#536635: libconfig8: Various library packaging errors

Hi, Cyril Thank you for your report. Please see below. Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Package: libconfig8 > Version: 1.3.2-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: MEH. > > Various issues: > - libconfig8 conflicts against libconfig6. Coinstallability is the >whole point of changing package name…

Bug#533177: lcdproc: Unused gentoo patch

Michael Terry wrote: > Package: lcdproc > Version: 0.5.2-3 > Severity: normal > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic > > The patch lcdproc-0.4.3-gentoo.diff is in the Debian source, but does not > seem to be applied (there's not even a patch system). Either it shou

Bug#531863: lcdproc: MtxOrb regression shows odd characters

Michael Terry wrote: > Package: lcdproc > Version: 0.5.2-3 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Ubuntu has applied a patch from upstream CVS to fix a regression in the > MtxOrb driver. The bug causes the wrong characters to be displayed. See > bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcdp

Bug#506933: Status?

Michal Čihař wrote: > Hi > > what is status here? Honestly, quite stalled. I could surely use some help and an sponsor for the upload, of course! :-) > Any schedule when you will be able to provide > package? > It might be worthy to work using an Alioth project --- that way, I will also pr

Bug#521725: [Fwd: Re: Processed: severity of 521725 is wishlist]

Julien Danjou wrote: > At 1240266545 time_t, José Luis Tallón wrote: > >> http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libconfig/libconfig_1.3.2-1.dsc >> > > > Probably a missing build-dep. Ping me when it's fixed. :-) > Indeed. I was s

Bug#521725: [Fwd: Re: Processed: severity of 521725 is wishlist]

Original Message Subject:Re: Processed: severity of 521725 is wishlist Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:26:58 +0200 From: José Luis Tallón To: Julien Danjou References: <1239128379-2834-bts-a...@debian.org> <49dba766.5030...@adv-solutions.net> <

Bug#521725: Processed: severity of 521725 is wishlist

Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> severity 521725 wishlist >> > Bug#521725: libconfig: New upstream version 1.3.2 > Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > Version 1.3.2 is now ready for upload. Mind to sponsor it Julien ?

Bug#520083: ITP: jconv -- Jconv is a Convolution reverb Engine for JACK

Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: "Jaromír Mikeš" > > * Package name: jconv > Version : 0.8.0 > Upstream Author : Fons Adriaensen > * URL : > * License : GPL > Programm

Bug#517331: Imapproxy refused to start when imap server is not available

package imapproxy severity #517331 wishlist tags #517331 + upstream thanks Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote: > Package: imapproxy > Version: 1.2.6-5 > Severity: important > > Hola, > > I upgraded Etch to Lenny today and ended with imapproxy service not being > up. I researched a bit and the pro

Bug#514103: picwiz: no bother to upload, removal or port to KDE 4

reassign #514103 ftp.debian.org retitle #514103 RM: picwiz -- RoM: does not work with KDE4 severity #514103 wishlist thanks Ana Guerrero wrote: > Hi, > > Current picwiz is useless in KDE 4. The best here is ask for removal, so > I will ask for removal in one week if the maintainer does not do it

Bug#514103: picwiz: Build-depends on kdebase-dev but does not use anything from it

Sune Vuorela wrote: > Package: picwiz > Version: 0.3.1-2+b1 > Severity: normal > > > Please remove the build-depend on kdebase-dev, you don't use it. > > (This bug will become seriosu post lenny where kdebase-dev will be a > kde4 thingie) > FIXED. Please find the updated version at: http://devel

Bug#483025: ITA: reiserfsprogs

Felix Zielcke wrote: > Hi, > > do you still plan to adopt reiserfsprogs? > If not then I'll do it. I hope that I'm soon a DM > I should have been a DM since little after 28/05, and still aren't :-| I still care much about reiserfsprogs, however. It migt be interesting to co-maintain, anyway.

Bug#510432: imapproxy

Niko Tyni wrote: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 05:32:52PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > >> Your change to the postrm script makes it fail at purge if ucf is not >> present any more. You shouldn't use '&&' with 'set -e' here: >> > > Uh, I'm wrong here. Sorry about that. It always seemed counterin

Bug#510432: imapproxy

Niko Tyni wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:22:46AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote: > > I still don't see this new version anywhere. > Are you aware that the release is scheduled eight days from now? > FIXED. The enclosed patch (also available at my repo) is the latest v

Bug#510432: imapproxy

Niko Tyni wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:02:42AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > >> The attached new patch seems to work for me, but please verify. It uses ucf >> for config file handling, which simplifies things IMO. >> > > I'm attaching an improved version that handles listen_port better

Bug#510432: imapproxy

Niko Tyni wrote: > Do you mean 1.2.6-5 at > > http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/mail/imapproxy/ > > dated 19-Jan-2009? As I noted before, it still overwrites user > configuration, particularly listen_port, without warning, so it's not > an acceptable fix for this bug. > Of course

Bug#510432: imapproxy

Niko Tyni wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:02:42AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > >> The attached new patch seems to work for me, but please verify. It uses ucf >> for config file handling, which simplifies things IMO. >> > > I'm attaching an improved version that handles listen_port better

Bug#510432: imapproxy

Christian Hammers wrote: > Hello > > Any progress with this Release Critical bug? > Ready to be uploaded, at: http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/mail/imapproxy/up-imapproxy_1.2.6-5.dsc Thank you to Niko Tyni and other contributors. Thanks to Christian for the other to upload. Re

Bug#510432: imapproxy

Matthew Johnson wrote: > We are BSPing in Cambridge this weekend, if you need this uploaded, let > me know > Thanks. I think I can have the package fixed (and tested!) tonight. Will send the package's URL to the bug's address. Have fun, and kill many bugs :-) Cheers, J.L. -- To UN

Bug#506933: Status ?

Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello, > > What is the status of this ITP ? Do you need help on this ? > I will need help to test the packaging / auto-installer hopefully soon. I haven't really started yet -- some personal problems got in my way Thank you for your interest. Will try to keep you infor

Bug#510432: upgrade from etch to lenny overwrites existing /etc/imapproxy.conf file with no warning

> This is release-critical (policy 10.7.3), raising the severity. > > Jose, the config script needs to read in the configuration file and > parse debconf defaults from there. The debconf database must not be > used as a registry. > Patches welcome. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs

Bug#499259: Processed: Please remove libconfig from the Archive

Hi all, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Hi, > > it has been requested to remove libconfig from the archive. > However, there is one (remaining) reverse dependency: xbattbar-acpi > I offer to help with porting xbattbar-acpi to hyperrealm's libconfig or other suitable version. Either that, or maybe bund

Bug#503713: Investigating Lenny release blocker bug: #503713

José Luis Tallón wrote: > Christian Perrier wrote: > >> Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> tags 503713 patch >>> thanks >>&g

Bug#503713: Investigating Lenny release blocker bug: #503713

Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Christian Perrier wrote: > > Quoting José Luis Tallón ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >>> José Luis, any plans to prepare an upload? I'd be happy to sponsor it > >>> if needed as fixing two RC bugs during this week-end would c

Bug#503713: Investigating Lenny release blocker bug: #503713

Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> tags 503713 patch >> thanks >> >> José Luis Tallón wrote: >> >>> I look forward to your

Bug#503713: Investigating Lenny release blocker bug: #503713

Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > I've been looking in to this bug because I use this package myself too, > and because it is among the RC bugs blocking lenny. > > As I wrote in my message to control@ [1], I merged this issue with > #481103 because they report the same issue only for a different versi

Bug#438683: Please remove libconfig from the Archive

reassign #499259 ftp.debian.org retitle #499259 RM: libconfig orphaned; please remove it from the Archive severity #499259 wishlist thanks Hi, Abraham vd Merwe's libconfig (he is both upstream and packager) has been orphaned for a while, due to ABZ being MIA (thanks, Frank) The only kn

Bug#491938: Patch for the 0.2a-3.1 NMU of bindgraph

Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >> OK. Do you have time to upload before my NMU enters the archive or >> would you profer some time and then I remove my upload to DELAYED. >> >> If you upload today, my NMU will then just be REJECTed when it reaches >

Bug#491938: Patch for the 0.2a-3.1 NMU of bindgraph

Christian Perrier wrote: > Dear maintainer of bindgraph, > > On Wednesday, October 15, 2008 I sent you a notice announcing my intent to > upload a > NMU of your package to fix its pending l10n issues, after an initial > notice sent on Wednesday, October 15, 2008. > > You either agreed for this NMU

Bug#502109: imapproxy: Fails to install with error "subprocess post-installation exit status 1"

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Jose, > > [snip] >> [ this message looks a bit odd... imapproxy does establish a >> connection, but it does not actually log in at this time] >> > > ...hum, before I used the imapproxy version under sarge with uw-imap without > any problems. > Versions 1.2.5

Bug#502109: imapproxy: Fails to install with error "subprocess post-installation exit status 1"

severity #502109 normal tags #502109 + moreinfo thanks Joris Mocka wrote: > Package: imapproxy > Version: 1.2.6-4 > Severity: important > > After running "apt-get install imapproxy" the following error occurs: > > Setting up imapproxy (1.2.6-4) ... > Starting IMAP proxy: invoke-rc.d: initscript im

Bug#494316: Updated package

Michael Casadevall wrote: > I've created a NMU to handle updating this package should the original > maintainer need help with the update. The changelog is as follows: > [snip] Thanks, the updated package was sent for upload about 10 days ago. Still waiting (I already poked the interested parties

Bug#416261: lcdproc in Debian

Thiemo Seufer wrote: > José Luis Tallón wrote: > >> I'd rather have a better, fixed, version uploaded than a "see if it >> works NMU", but almost anything is better than what we have now. >> >> Jonathan Oxer, the original maintainer, is basically

Bug#494316: libsmbios 2.0

Hi Luk Claes wrote: > retitle 494316 libsmbios: version 2.0 needed for 2.6.26 kernel > severity 494316 serious > thanks > > Ok, title and severity of bug changed to match this. > Please ask for a freeze exception once a new version is uploaded. > Cheers > Sorry for the delay -- I have been away

Bug#494316: libsmbios 2.0

Hi, release team Philippe Latu wrote: > Hello, > > Just a followup to the previous request. > > The actual package is unusable with kernel above 2.6.25.x. > That is, libsmbios 1.x can't be used with a newer kernel. > As Lenny should be released with the 2.6.26 kernel, a libsmbios-2.0.3 package

Bug#497899: ITP: automysqlbackup -- a daily, weekly and monthly backup for your MySQL database

Thomas Goirand wrote: > José Luis Tallón wrote: > > [snip] > Hi, > > Thanks for that one. I added all your changes, and I will send them to > my debian repo. Do you have anything more to add before I send the file > to my sponsor for upload? > I'm testing

Bug#497899: ITP: automysqlbackup -- a daily, weekly and monthly backup for your MySQL database

Thomas Goirand wrote: > José Luis Tallón wrote: > >> Please count on me as beta-tester, or if you need some help/input with >> the package, just tell me. >> I'd rather have a good package in Debian than having to maintain it >> myself (we only use packaged so

Bug#400066: Processed: found 400066 in lcdproc/0.5.2-1

Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > [big snip] > >> If you would sponsor it, we can certainly upload an "architecture: any" >> version of lcdproc --- please remember that I have no access to any >> porting machine and am thus unable to test compilation on other arches. >> > > That's what the buildd ne

Bug#494316: libsmbios 2.0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Package: libsmbios1 > Version: 0.12.1-3 > Severity: wishlist > > Hello, > > There seems to be a 2.0 version of the libsmbios tools, available > at http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/libsmbios.git/ > > (this page is btw not mentioned at > http://linux.dell.com/libsmbios/main/

Bug#491795: libsmbios: Package does not use upstream's config.{sub,guess} or ltmain.sh

Package: libsmbios severity #491795 important tags #491795 + moreinfo usertags #491795 + ubuntu quit Hi, Mario Mario Limonciello wrote: > Package: libsmbios > Version: 0.13.13 > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > > *** Please type your report below this line *** > T

Bug#489073: update-rc.d: warning: /etc/init.d/imapproxy missing LSB style header

Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > Package: imapproxy > Version: 1.2.6-4 > Severity: normal > > > An update reports: > > update-rc.d: warning: /etc/init.d/imapproxy missing LSB style header > Well... actually, this is a Release Goal... it could as well be marked as "important". The header is *definitely

Bug#397924: Subject: Re:libtrash: new upstream version 3.2 available

Sumit Madan wrote: > José Luis Tallón wrote: >> Last time I checked and tried to update the packaging, it gave several >> obscure compilation errors. AFAICR, those were related to Python. >> >> Now that we have Python2.5 stable and in testing, I will take a look at &g

Bug#488467: SEGFAULT in libtrash when using ls -l

Hi, Mike What you report here is indeed *grave* I am about to package version 3.2 per another user's request (otherwise, I would have requested this package's removal from the Archive in light of this) Mike Hommey wrote: > severity 488467 grave > retitle 488467 libtrash is dangerously br

Bug#488278: Support for lpia arch

Loïc Minier wrote: > Package: libsmbios > Version: 0.13.13-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > It would be nice if you could merge the attached patch which simply > lists lpia in the Architecture field of the package; see > for more informat

Bug#397924: Subject: Re:libtrash: new upstream version 3.2 available

Sumit Madan wrote: > Hello, > > new upstream version 3.2 is available. > > URL: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~marriaga/software/libtrash/ I thought that there was almost no interest on libtrash left. Last time I checked and tried to update the packaging, it gave several obscure compilation errors. A

Bug#487761: Re postinst overwrites /etc/imapproxy.conf with empty file

Sven Hartge wrote: > Um 03:04 Uhr am 24.06.08 schrieb José Luis Tallón >> I have been unable to reproduce this bug in my preliminar testing. >> Would you mind giving me some more details ? >> Unfortunately, it seems that my test environment was flawed (stale co

Bug#487761: postinst overwrites /etc/imapproxy.conf with empty file

Sven Hartge wrote: > Package: imapproxy > Version: 1.2.6-3 > Severity: critical > > The postinst overwrote my working /etc/imapproxy.conf with an empty file > and thus causes the daemon to fail to start and consequentially all > applications using the proxy. > Which PERL version are you using? (

Bug#487761: Re postinst overwrites /etc/imapproxy.conf with empty file

tags #487761 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks Hi, Sven I have been unable to reproduce this bug in my preliminar testing. Would you mind giving me some more details ? Does 1.2.6-2 exhibit this behaviour ? The -3 upgrade has been done to fix an annoying bug (non-grave, just cosme

Bug#452298: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the up-imapproxy package

Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting José Luis Tallón ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >> José Luis Tallón wrote: >> >>> Actually, none of those, but I understand that this is a template. >>> >>> I have agreed to a (sponsored) maintainer upload including

Bug#452298: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the up-imapproxy package

José Luis Tallón wrote: > Actually, none of those, but I understand that this is a template. > > I have agreed to a (sponsored) maintainer upload including all > outstanding localization issues, plus fixes for some easy bugs. > > > Thank you *all* for making Debian available

Bug#485488: [INTL:gl] Galician debconf template translation for up-imapproxy

tags #485488 + pending patch thanks Jacobo Tarrio wrote: > Package: up-imapproxy > Severity: wishlist > Tags: l10n patch > > It is attached to this report. > Added, thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#452298: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the up-imapproxy package

Christian Perrier wrote: > Dear maintainer of up-imapproxy and Debian translators, > > Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the up-imapproxy Debian > package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation > update in the BTS. > > I announced the intent to build an

Bug#452298: Announce of an upcoming upload for the up-imapproxy package

tags #452298 + patch + pending thanks Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > Portuguese translation, feel free to use it. > Translator: Luísa Lourenço <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Added again. Thanks. > Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, > > Miguel Figueiredo > http://www.DebianPT.org > -- To UNSUBS

Bug#452298: Announce of an upcoming upload for the up-imapproxy package

Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > I sent the Portuguese translation, somewhere in 2006 - i remember it like it > was today :) - as bug #381663 [1]. > But i don't see a pt.po in the source package or in this list. > > Isn't supposed the pt.po file to be already included? > Without checking the bugrepor

Bug#479402: kchmviewer: package Qt4 port (4.0 beta 2 released) in experimental

Fathi Boudra wrote: >> Since I'm still in NM, would you mind sponsoring the upload ? >> > > sure. > I have been more than overloaded as of lately. This is just to say "I haven't forgotten this request". I apologize for the inconvenience, but I just can't cope for the time being. Thank y

Bug#411070: libsieve2-1_ still tries to overwrite file owned by libmailutils1

Ralf Treinen wrote: > Sorry but this isn't resolved yet: > > Unpacking libsieve2-1 (from .../libsieve2-1_2.2.6-1_amd64.deb) ... > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/libsieve2-1_2.2.6-1_amd64.deb (-- > unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libsieve.so.1', which is also in package >

Bug#414729: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the bindgraph package

Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting José Luis Tallón ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >> When shall we upload this, then ? >> > > When it's ready..:-) > > Just prepare the package, point me to the .dsc file and I'll upload. > http://devel.adv-

Bug#414729: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the bindgraph package

Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >> Quoting José Luis Tallón ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> >> >>> When shall we upload this, then ? >>> >> When it's ready..:-) >> >> Ju

Bug#479402: kchmviewer: package Qt4 port (4.0 beta 2 released) in experimental

Hi, Fathi Fathi Boudra wrote: > Package: kchmviewer > Version: 3.1-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > please package kchmviewer Qt4 port (4.0 beta 2 release) in experimental. > Hmm... do we gain anything? Does kchmviewer4 also support KDE? or is it just pure Qt4 ? I haven't packaged

Bug#414729: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the bindgraph package

Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting José Luis Tallón ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >>> I suggest we wait until the 10 days update round is over, then you >>> re-prepare an upload, which I can upload. >>> >>> >> Sure :-) >> >

Bug#400066: Processed: found 400066 in lcdproc/0.5.2-1

Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> lcdproc 0.5.2-1 states "Architecture: i386 amd64" in its control file. >> > Yes, that's a bug. > >> I don't understand why this package is

Bug#400066: closed by Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#400066: fixed in lcdproc 0.5.2-1)

Nicolas François wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Format: 1.8 >> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:25:50 +0100 >> Source: lcdproc >> Binary: lcdproc >> Architecture: source amd64 >> Version: 0.5.2-1 >> Distribution: unstable >> Urgency: medium >> Maintainer: Jose Luis Tallon

Bug#414729: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the bindgraph package

Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting José Luis Tallón ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >> I have indeed sent the updated package to the intended sponsor about a >> couple weeks ago, but the upload has not happened. >> >> Proceed as you prefer: you can either upload your

  1   2   3   >