hi mattia,
umh? So, I read a bit the manpage, this was enough.
IMHO, you gave up way too early, and I really much don't like it.
well, thanks for your patience. i did think that i had possibly figured
out the correct way to do it, but i wasn't sure. it can be hard to tell
if you've done som
On 23/05/2016 23:52, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
On 23/05/2016 15:39, Jonathon Love wrote:
hi julien,
On 23/05/2016 23:16, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Hi Julien,
exactly the some days ago you hit this too:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000
hi julien,
On 23/05/2016 23:16, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Hi Julien,
exactly the some days ago you hit this too:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote:
hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except:
Also, you did not use
hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except:
Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging
there are a lot of tutorials which explain how to start a repo from
scratch using DPMT, but it's hard to know what to do with an established
r
control: owner -1 !
hi,
the submitter of 776083 has let me take ownership of the ITP[1]
i have updated the uploader/maintainer fields, and committed the package to:
/git/python-modules/packaging/python-nanomsg.git
with thanks
jonathon
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/776083
owner 776083 j...@thon.cc
When you upload your package with dput, you can use to -f option to
force the upload if the same version already exists on d-mentors.
ah! good tip!
i'm used to Ubuntu PPA's where you can't do that (i don't think... i
think if you -f it rejects them).
OK, the package is now available from:
hi andrey,
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:17:27AM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote:
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flatbuffers/flatbuffers_1.3.0-2.dsc
This gives 404.
https://mentors.debian.net
hi,
so the advice i received regarding the name was that i must get it
renamed upstream[1]. i don't think this will be possible because:
- upstream is an established package, present in PYPI and macports
- the developer is MIA
(additionally, the official Protocol Buffers 3 supports Python 3
umh, you force pushed everything, master, upstream and pristine-tar
branches. WHY? what did you do?
oh, sorry, i never intended for you to look at that repo, assuming you'd
look at the debian-mentors one.
And still it doesn't build, if that was meant to fix it.
Without thinking of it I alrea
hi matt,
thanks for the review, and sorry for the embarrassing "does not build"
situation. i was packaging on ubuntu, and my experience has been that if
it works there, it will work on debian - but apparently not, i'll be
more careful in future.
i'm actually writing to ask your advice about
hi frederico,
i have packaged this package, and it is presently on alioth at:
/git/python-modules/packages/python-nanomsg.git
would you be happy for me to take over this ITP, and have the package
submitted?
with thanks
jonathon
msg-python
Regards,
Jonathon Love
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python3-protobuf3"
* Package name: python3-protobuf3
Version : 0.2.1-2
Upstream Author :Sergey Petrov
* URL : https://github.com/Pr0Ger/protobuf3
* License
latbuffers/flatbuffers_1.3.0-2.dsc
More information about flatbuffers can be obtained from
http://google.github.io/flatbuffers/ and
https://github.com/google/flatbuffers
with thanks
Jonathon Love
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathon Love
* Package name: python3-protobuf3
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Sergey Petrov
* URL : https://github.com/Pr0Ger/protobuf3
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Implementation
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathon Love
* Package name: flatbuffers
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : Wouter van Oortmerssen
* URL : http://google.github.io/flatbuffers/
* License : Apache-V2
Programming Lang: C++, Java, Javascript
i have already. he thought i was probably right, but not enough to act
on it.
On 28/04/2016 07:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I'd suggest to discuss this with upstream.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathon Love
* Package name: r-cran-rprotobuf
Version : 0.4.3
Upstream Author : Dirk Eddelbuettel
* URL : https://github.com/eddelbuettel/rprotobuf
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: R, C
Description : An R
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathon Love
* Package name: r-cran-ca
Version : 0.64
Upstream Author : Oleg Nenadic
* URL : http://www.carme-n.org/
* License : GPL2, GPL3
Programming Lang: R
Description : An R package providing computation
Package: ftp.debian.org,r-cran-afex
Version: 0.14-2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.3
Dear Maintainer,
I believe the r-cran-afex package violates the GPL. It is released under GPL3+,
however it has GPL2-only dependencies (r-cran-stringr, r-cran-coin,
r-crain-lsmeans),
yup, i was just waiting for r-cran-estimability (a dependency) to become
available before pushing this one.
it's there now.
jonathon
On 30/08/2015 8:21 am, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jonathon,
>
> the remote git repository of this package is empty.
>
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
>
--
23 matches
Mail list logo
