On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:28:01 -0800
John Darrah wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:27:16AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:29:43 -0800
> > John Darrah wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:09:33AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > &
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:29:43 -0800
John Darrah wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:09:33AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:29:22 -0800
> > John Darrah wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:26:07PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > &
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 01:24:36 +0100
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 09:14 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:10:34 -0500
> > Jeff Layton wrote:
> [...]
> > > I had a look at the code today and suspect that I know what the problem
> &
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:20:44 +0200
Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/24/2012 11:16 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:35:13 -0700
> > Greg KH wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> >>> Hi,
&g
attempt to do an NFS mount
after memory is already heavily fragmented. This allocation was
fricking huge before those patches...
That said, I'm not sure that really qualifies as stable-kernel fodder...
--
Jeff Layton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:09:33 +0200
John Hughes wrote:
> On 27/09/11 20:27, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:31:32 -0400
> > Jeff Layton wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Not sure what happened here. Looks like the "freeze phase"
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:31:32 -0400
Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:52:58 +0200
> John Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 23/09/11 17:09, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > I went ahead and attached the latest one to the RHBZ above. If you can
> > > grab it from there
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:52:58 +0200
John Hughes wrote:
> On 23/09/11 17:09, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > I went ahead and attached the latest one to the RHBZ above. If you can
> > grab it from there and test it, that would be great.
> >
>
> Ok, I'm now testing th
nd it seems to work.
>
> Thanks for writing and testing it. Has this patch visited the
> linux-nfs@, linux-cifs@, or linux-pm@ list?
Not yet. I was planning to post the revised version next week after
John tested it.
--
Jeff Layton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-di
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:01:20 +0200
John Hughes wrote:
> On 23/09/11 16:40, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:30:36 +0200
> > John Hughes wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Well, after minor modifications (needed to include freezer.h in
> >> fs/nfs/i
rocessor).
>
Thanks for testing them. I actually have a revised version that
includes the right header and also fixes some other cases where the NFS
code can sleep like this. I'll see if I can get something together for
3.2.
--
Jeff Layton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Package: heimdal-kdc
Version: 0.6.3-6
Followup-For: Bug #284498
Just a followup note. I've been running the patched version of this
daemon for the last couple of weeks and it has not crashed on me once.
After I rebooted my box a few days ago, the unpatched version got
started, and it started crash
Package: bacula-director-sqlite
Version: 1.36.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #285755
I think we can chalk this up to a corrupt database. Kind of bad that
sqlite was crashing due to this, but it doesn't seem to be a problem
with bacula-director after all. Please close this at your leisure, and
thanks for th
13 matches
Mail list logo
