Hello Tobias,
I've added missed copyright notices.
BTW, my packages were removed from mentors.debian.net since no sponsor
was found for up to 20 weeks. Now I've restored upload and opened new
RFS bugs. Thus, for this particular package it is 1072726.
Great thanks for your attention.
Best regard
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ru-tts":
* Package name : ru-tts
Version : 6.2.2-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/ru_tts
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rulex":
* Package name : rulex
Version : 3.8.4-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/rulex
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multispeech":
* Package name : multispeech
Version : 4.6.2-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/m
the initial release:
freespeech (1.0m-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1055900)
Regards,
--
Igor B. Poretsky
Hello Tobias,
> "Tobias" == Tobias Frost writes:
Tobias> - m4/* has undocumentd files.
Why should these files be mentioned especially? Isn't the "Files: *"
stanza sufficient?
Tobias> - */Makefile.in are not documented
The Makefile.in files are autogenerated. How should be they doc
Hello Tobias,
> "Tobias" == Tobias Frost writes:
Tobias> Until the first upload is sponsored, you just keep a single
Tobias> changelog entry. In the case of a new upstream version, you
Tobias> just change the version accordingly.
Very much thanks for your clarification. So, I'v
Hello Tobias,
> "Tobias" == Tobias Frost writes:
Tobias> The "-1" is the Debian revision; it is orthogonal to the
Tobias> upstream version, (except the rules where it resets to
Tobias> usually -1, of course)
So, what should I do if my package has not been yet sponsored, but a ne
Hello Tobias,
> "Tobias" == Tobias Frost writes:
Tobias> You should be able to just re-upload to mentors. If it does
Tobias> not allow that, remove the package manually from mentors,
Tobias> then re-upload. In the case a bot auto-close this RFS bug,
Tobias> just manually re-o
Hello Tobias,
Great thanks for your review. I'll try to address all the issues listed,
but several questions by the way below:
> "Tobias" == Tobias Frost writes:
Tobias> d/changelog: - An initial upload to Debian only have one
Tobias> single entry, like "Initial Upload (Closes:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multispeech":
* Package name : multispeech
Version : 4.6.0-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/m
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ru-tts":
* Package name : ru-tts
Version : 6.2.0-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/ru_tts
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rulex":
* Package name : rulex
Version : 3.8.0-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/rulex
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freespeech":
* Package name : freespeech
Version : 1.0m-21
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/freespeech
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Igor B. Poretsky"
* Package name: multispeech
Version : 4.6.0
Upstream Author : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/multispeech
* License : GPL-2.0
Programming Lang: C++
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Igor B. Poretsky"
* Package name: freespeech
Version : 1.0m
Upstream Author : Steve Isard, Alistair Conkie
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/freespeech
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Igor B. Poretsky"
* Package name: rulex
Version : 3.8.0
Upstream Author : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/rulex
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: C
Description : Pro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Igor B. Poretsky"
* Package name: ru-tts
Version : 6.2.0
Upstream Author : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/ru_tts
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Compact an
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1
Severity: important
When installing the package, it tries to download actual application
from download.macromedia.com, but this domain name appears to be
unresolvable. It seems that actual download address has been changed.
-
Package: emms
Version: 2.1+clean-1
Severity: important
I do attach a little patch for emms-player-simple.el that solves the
problem. In addition I'd suggest to fix simple player definition macro
to make the regex customization actually functional. The suggested
correction is also included into the
Hello!
I've slightly investigated the problem myself. In the apt-utils.el I
see the form:
(defconst apt-utils-completing-read-hashtable-p
(and (not apt-utils-xemacs-p)
(or
;; Next released version after 21.3 will support this
(and
(>= emacs-major-version 21)
Package: debian-el
Version: 24.10-1
Severity: important
When I try to call "apt-utils-show-package" interactively, see the
prompt "Choose Debian package:" and answer "apt" for example, it fails
with an error. Here is a backtrace for this case:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (invalid-function #)
Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 2.59-0.2
Severity: normal
Sometimes when upgrading packages with apt-get I see on my console the
text like follows:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", line 218, in ?
main()
File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", line 5
Package: wget-el
Version: 0.5.0-2
Severity: normal
I see no point in dropping to nil wget-proccess-buffer in the startup
file, so no information window is displayed on downloading and
wget-info has no effect.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.2
Package: cvs
Version: 1:1.12.9-9
Severity: normal
It seems that pcl-cvs fails to parse some messages received from cvs
after performing some commands, such as "cvs commit".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Ke
Package: emacs21
Version: 21.3+1-8
Severity: normal
It seems that pcl-cvs fails to parse cvs messages after performing
some commands, such as "cvs commit", for instance. It appeared with
new versions of cvs found in Sarge distribution.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers test
26 matches
Mail list logo
