Package: texlive-xetex
Version: 2024.20250114-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
after the latest upload of texlive-base a TeX file using
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} can't
be compiled any more using XeLaTeX:
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{docum
Package: ghostscript
Version: 10.04.0~dfsg-1
Followup-For: Bug #1085120
Dear Maintainer,
Can we have a status update here? Are you eventually able to
provide a bug fix before release of 10.05.0?
Currently we have the situation that asymptote does not build
on trixie and I wouldn't like to releas
Control: block -1 by 1092330
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: blocks -1 by 1092330
On 16.01.25 Damir R. Islamov (da...@secretlaboratory.ru) wrote:
Hi Damir,
> $ ldd /usr/bin/luametatex
> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7f08df695000)
> libmimalloc.so.2 => not found
> libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x7f08df57e000)
> libc.so
Source: texlive-lang
Version: 2024.20250114-1
Severity: grave
Dear Maintainer,
the package should not migrate to testing for now.
Hilmar
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.9
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Arch
Control: severity -1 grave
On 16.01.25 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
> Source: texlive-extra
> Version: 2024.20250114-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> the package should not migrate to testing for now.
>
Has to be severity RC.
H.
signat
Source: texlive-extra
Version: 2024.20250114-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the package should not migrate to testing for now.
Hilmar
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.9
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Arc
On 14.01.25 Salvo Tomaselli (ltw...@debian.org) wrote:
Hello,
> I was reviewing this and ran debdiff and there seem to be entries removed
> from
> previous changelogs… this shouldn't really be happening.
>
> Can you fix it?
>
I can't follow here. Yes, some lines vanished, but they were repla
Source: ffmpeg
Version: 7:7.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: texinfo72
Dear Maintainer,
your package fails to build with the upcoming TeXInfo, which I've uploaded
to experimental. The error message is:
Can't locate object method "gdt" via package "Texinfo::Convert::HTML" at
/<>/doc
Source: check
Version: 0.15.2-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: texinfo72
Dear Maintainer,
your package fails to build with the upcoming TeXInfo, which I've uploaded
to experimental. The error message is:
check.texi:2327: no matching `@end verbatim'
check.texi:2138: Next reference to n
Control: tags -1 - wontfix
On 07.01.25 Bjarni Ingi Gislason (bjarn...@simnet.is) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 11:49:06PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> > On 04.01.25 10:45, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
Hello,
> I do not use this generator.
>
Me neither. However it is always wrong to modif
Control: block -1 by 1092293
On 07.01.25 Grégory Mounié (greg...@kiowa.imag.fr) wrote:
Hello,
> tex-common fail to configure with libmimalloc2.0/sid that provide only
> libmimalloc.so.3.0
>
> error file produce by the configuration:
> root@kiowa:~# cat /tmp/mtxrun.ETU2uklV
> mtxrun: error while
Source: mimalloc
Version: 3.0.1+ds-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
this bug is RC, IMHO. Maybe I'll look into the policy tomorrow and then bump
severity. In the new version of the package the soname of the library changed
from libmimalloc.so.2 to libmimalloc.so.3 and now (e.g. /usr/bin/lua
On 31.12.24 Bjarni Ingi Gislason (bjarn...@simnet.is) wrote:
Hello,
> Package: texlive-extra-utils
> Version: 2024.20241115-1
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>
> Checking for defects with a new version
>
The patch does not apply to the current upstre
Control: block -1 by 1085120
On 23.12.24 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to
> build on armhf.
>
> This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this is a
> regression. Also, there are no known issues on amd64
On 23.12.24 Johann Hoermann (supp...@hans-hoermann.de) wrote:
Hi all,
as already found out the issue /might/ already be reported (and
solved) in upstream:
https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708066
Please try to avoid another duplicate.
Hilmar
> with ghostscript 10.0.0, installed at
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
This transition was already started by the recent proftpd upload, but is
not caught caught automatica
+dfsg/debian/control 2024-11-29 20:44:14.0 +
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: ProFTPD Maintainance Team
Uploaders: Francesco Paolo Lovergine ,
- Hilmar Preusse
+ Hilmar Preuße
Standards-Version: 4.6.0
Build-Depends: debhelper-compat
On 25.11.24 Steven Robbins (st...@sumost.ca) wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 23:31:52 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi Steven,
> > We noticed that package asymptote fails to build on armel [1]. It fails
> > at a point, when the compiled asy binary is called to generate the
> > d
On 25.11.24 Steven Robbins (st...@sumost.ca) wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 23:31:52 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hello,
> > We noticed that package asymptote fails to build on armel [1]. It fails
> > at a point, when the compiled asy binary is called to generate the
> > d
On 22.11.24 brian m. carlson (sand...@crustytoothpaste.net) wrote:
Hi,
> This package ships a large number of OpenType fonts that are not
> available elsewhere in Debian. The one I am particularly interested in
> is Source Code Pro, which I use for my terminal and editor, but there
> are others
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: xi...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:xindy
nmu xindy_2.5.1.20160104-12 . s390x ppc64 . unstable . -m "BinNMU to correct
dependency on clisp."
signature.asc
Des
On 19.09.24 Brian Ristuccia (brian.ristuc...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi Francesco,
> We've run into a problem with proftpd + mod_sftp + mod_sql, where a
> user with no supplemental groups will incorrectly inherit supplemental
> groups from the parent process. In ProFTPD Version 1.3.5, this
> behavior r
Control: forcemerge -1 1086757
On 14.11.24 Christian Engwer (christian.eng...@uni-muenster.de) wrote:
Hi,
> after upgrade compiling a latex document with minted failes with the
> latest texlive packages.
>
> The problem is that the `latexminted` executable is not found. Running
> `lualatex --sh
Source: icinga2
Version: 2.14.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream security
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Dear Maintainer,
I'm pretty sure you're aware, nevertheless here is the but report:
https://icinga.com/blog/2024/11/12/critical-icinga-2-security-releas
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 05.11.24 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2024, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> > So, I created a symbolic link 'latexminted -> latexminted.py' and it worked.
Hi,
> Yes, the recent update of minted brought a new binary, and AFAIR also an
> updat
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 11:14:34PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hello Jonathan,
Thanks for response!
> > diff -Nru texlive-bin-2022.20220321.62855/debian/changelog
> > texlive-bin-2022.20220321.62855/debian/changelog
> > --- texlive-bin-2022.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: texlive-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:texlive-bin
[ Reason ]
- Fix a security leak.
- Fix a bug, which could lead to data loss (text in documents)
Control: affects -1 src:asymptote
On 14.10.24 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
> We noticed that package asymptote fails to build on armel [1]. It fails
> at a point, when the compiled asy binary is called to generate the
> documentation. The asy binary calls gs to generate a pdf
Package: ghostscript
Version: 10.04.0~dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
ignore the version information below, they are just from the machine
running reportbug.
We noticed that package asymptote fails to build on armel [1]. It fails
at a point, when the compiled asy binary i
Source: avrdude
Version: 7.1+dfsg-3
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
the build log of avrdude reports:
dh_missing --list-missing
dh_missing: warning: usr/include/libavrdude.h exists in debian/tmp but is not
installed to anywhere
dh_missing: warning: usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libavrdude.a exi
On 22.09.24 Brian Ristuccia (brian.ristuc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2024, 6:15 PM Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi Brian,
> > For now I submitted the issue at upstream.
> >
> > Hilmar
> >
>
> Thank you. Do you know who might be responsible for requesting
On 22.09.24 Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) wrote:
Hello Don,
Many thanks for the answer.
> To enable us to investigate errors or problems you should provide us
> with the following information (or as much of it as possible):
>
> * the IP,
> * the Time (including timezone),
> * the Message
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/1830
On 19.09.24 Brian Ristuccia (brian.ristuc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Package: proftpd-core
> Version: 1.3.8+dfsg-4+deb12u3
> Severity: grave
>
For now I submitted the issue at upstream.
Hilmar
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I find it currently annoying that I can't send E-Mails to Debian bugs from
a specific computer, b/c this is the one I work mostly with. The phenomenon
started about 3 weeks ago. The mails are simply not received, neither they
are visible
On 19.09.24 Frank Neuber (s...@kernelport.com) wrote:
> Am 19.09.24 um 14:43 schrieb Hilmar Preusse:
> > On 09.01.24 Oliver C. (kreuzritter2...@gmx.de) wrote:
Hi Frank,
> > > Package: libifd-cyberjack6
> > > Version: 3.99.5final.sp14-2
> > > Severity: importa
On 09.01.24 Oliver C. (kreuzritter2...@gmx.de) wrote:
Hi Frank,
> Package: libifd-cyberjack6
> Version: 3.99.5final.sp14-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: a11y upstream
> X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@kernelport.com, siret...@tauware.de, kreuzritter2...@gmx.de
>
> The current version available in the Debain
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.23.4+deb12u1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
my upstream delivers the software in zip files, which can't be uncompressed
using the UNIX unzip, b/c the zip format delivered can't be handeled by
UNIX unzip.
hille@rasppi2:~/devel/wp2latex $ unzip wp2latex-4.10b.zi
Testmail. Ingore.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: latex-cjk-japanese-wada...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab
nmu latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab_0.20050817-19 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild o
Control: retitle -1 libxaw: Uploading upstream version 1.0.16 will cause FTBFS
On 28.07.24 Thomas Dickey (dic...@his.com) wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 11:31:33PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > Source: libxaw
> > Version: 2:1.0.14-1
>
> 1.0.16 is the latest version. Re
retitle -1 libxaw: Uploading upstream version 1.0.16 will cause FTBFS
On 28.07.24 Thomas Dickey (dic...@his.com) wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 11:31:33PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > Source: libxaw
> > Version: 2:1.0.14-1
>
> 1.0.16 is the latest version. Retit
Source: libxaw
Version: 2:1.0.14-1
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
this is rather an information than a real bug report. The latest version
of libxaw introduces a change which will break the build for at least
one package (texlive-bin).
commit d0fcbd9722ad691ca0b5873c98e8e9c236fa
Source: r-cran-flextable
Version: 0.9.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
the autopkgtest of the package currently fails when using TL2024. This
would prevent TL2024 from migrating into testing (AFAICT). Not sure
if it is really caused the TL2024 or if the issue was present be
Source: context-modules
Version: 20240428-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Package should not migrate to testing for now.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stabl
Source: context
Version: 2024.04.01.20240428+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Package should not migrate to testing for now.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500
Source: texlive-bin
Version: 2024.20240313.70630+ds-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Should not migrate to testing for now.
H.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500,
Source: biber
Version: 2.20-2
Severity: grave
biber should not migrate to testing for now.
H.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)
Foreign Architectur
Source: texlive-base
Version: 2024.20240401-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Should not migrate to testing for now.
H.
-- Package-specific info:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning
the packaging of TeX Live as relevant. If you have problem
Source: mimalloc
Version: 2.1.4+ds-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs upstream
Dear Maintainer,
as you noticed the version 2.1.4+ds-1 does not build on some arches.
The issue has been discussed in [1], it is likely that the issue has
been solved in 2.1.6. So please package the new version to get r
Package: lilypond
Version: 2.24.3-1
Severity: important
Control: affects -1 src:texlive-base
Dear Maintainer,
I recently uploaded TL 2024 to Debian experimental. I just noticed that the
autopkgtex test of your package fails w/ TL 2024. Currently I have no time
frame for the upload of TL 2024 to e
#1038937).
* Bump Standards and dh compat version, no changes needed.
* Add upstream metadata file.
* Add "Conflicts: fq".
The package is marked as LowNMU (https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu).
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2022.20230122-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I've created a manual page for simpdftex. Consider to include
it into our package.
Hilmar
-- Package-specific info:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning
the packaging of
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: texwo...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:texworks
Control: block #1057407 by -1
In #1057407 we got a request to remove texworks for i386, which is (currently)
the only pac
Source: mpfi
Version: 1.5.3+ds-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
I'm on the way to package the TeX Live sources (also known as src:texlive-bin)
for TL 2024. The sources use the library mpfi. Unfortunately(?) the TL
maintainers use
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-mod-pr...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-mod-proxy
[ Reason ]
The version currently in Debian stable suffers from the CVE-2023-48795
(T
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
[Reason]
The version currently in Debian stable suffers from two
different security issues:
-
y=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Fix FTBFS with TeXinfo 7.x (Closes: #1030350).
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: libpoppler126
Version: 22.12.0-2+b1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
don't care about the system information below, these are just from the
system, running reportbug.
The poppler library has an issue rendering images / fonts correctly, when
running on big endian machines. Assume the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
This transition was already started by the recent proftpd upload, but is not
caught automatically sin
Source: texlive-extra
Version: 2023.20231207-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
texlive-extra was uploaded with wrong urgency. Hence
it would migrate to testing earlier than src:texlive-base &
src:texlive-lang. This bug blocks the migration for now, I'll close
it, once the other two packages ten
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.85.0
Severity: normal
I run sbuild as following:
sbuild --no-run-lintian --arch-all --dist=sid *.dsc -d unstable-amd64-sbuild
, where unstable-amd64-sbuild references a chroot. Updating the chroot is done:
sudo sbuild-update -udcar unstable-amd64-sbuild
Both commands
1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1032354)
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source: texlive-bin
Version: 2023.20230311.66589-8
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the luazlib contains a check, which checks if the zlib version it was
linked with (compile time) is the same as which is used during
run time.
texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7/texk/web2c/luatexdir/luazlib/lzlib
Package: zlib1g
Version: 1:1.3.dfsg-2
Followup-For: Bug #1056312
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org
Hello Mark,
In 1:1.2.6.dfsg-2 an "Breaks: ... texlive-binaries (<< 2009-12)" statement
was introduced to make sure the broken tl-bin packages are phased out.
We now need the same again
Control: block -1 by 1056204
Control: merge -1 1056183
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: merge -1 1056183
On 19.11.23 François Rozet (francois.rozet...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
> Package: texlive-binaries
> Version: 2023.20230311.66589-7
>
> The luatex binary shipped with texlive is not compatible with zlib 1.3
> (zlib1g 1:1.3.dfsg-2 on Debian Sid).
Package: auctex
Version: 12.2-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I intend to salvage that package as a member of the Debian TeX team and
to put it into team maintenance. I contacted Davide G. M. Salvetti two
times [1] and offered a co-maintenance, but did not get a response.
The criteria dir
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
[ Reason ]
In Proftp 1.3.8 the buffer size for SSL communicatio set to small,
so some SFTP cli
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
This transition was already started by the recent proftpd upload, but is not
caught automatically sin
Package: raspi-firmware
Version: 1:1.20231024+ds-1+rpt1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.4
Hello,
the package fails to install on my system. I simply assumes that /boot/firmware
is a
mount point and fails if this is not the case. If /boot/firmware is expected to
be a
mount point the in
Package: autoproject
Version: 0.20-14
Severity: important
With the upload of TeXInfo 7.1 the autopkg test fails to run:
72s autopkgtest [03:20:32]: test test: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - -
- - - - -
72s test FAIL stderr: gpl.texinfo:1: warning: @setfilename
after the fi
medium
.
* Split luajit based binaries into texlive-binaries-sse2 to make
TL usable on non-sse2 capable CPU's at all (Closes: #1041148).
* Remove kfreebsd* from LuaJIT arches.
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
--
sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
medium
.
* Split luajit based binaries into texlive-binaries-sse2 to make
TL usable on non-sse2 capable CPU's at all (Closes: #1041148).
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
--
sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source: r-bioc-biocstyle
Version: 2.28.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I just noticed, that the autopkgtest of your package fail, since I uploaded
TL 2023 to unstable [1].
178s You can now run (pdf)latex on ‘maketitle_test_1.tex’
179s Timing stopped at: 0.754 0.102 1.264
179s Error
Control: retitle -1 RFS: texlive-bin/2023.20230311.66589-4 -- TeX Live: Package
split
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 27.07.23 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for m
ntal; urgency=medium
.
* Split luajit based binaries into texlive-binaries-sse2 to make
TL usable on non sse2 capable CPU's at all (Closes: #1041148).
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
--
sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
* Initial release. (Closes: #1041668)
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
--
sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hilmar Preusse
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: hintview
Version : 1.3.1
Upstream Contact: Martin Ruckert
* URL : https://hint.userweb.mwn.de/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
-2023-32668: disable socket in luatex by default
+ (Closes: #1036470).
+
+ -- Hilmar Preusse Mon, 12 Jun 2023 23:19:18 +0200
+
texlive-bin (2022.20220321.62855-5.1) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru texlive-bin-2022.20220321.62855/debian/control texlive-bin-2022
Package: fonts-junicode
Version: 2+git20230104+ds-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the package description reads:
"This is a TrueType Unicode font targeted at medievalists..."
However the package just contains OpenType fonts since one of the
latest uploads. Not sure if this is intended.
Hi
-02 12:56:07.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+texlive-extra (2022.20230122-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Apply patch for pstricks.tex to fix dvi color handling
+(Closes: #1035313).
+
+ -- Hilmar Preusse Tue, 02 May 2023 12:56:07 +0200
+
texlive-extra (2022.20230122-3) unstable; urgency
uametatex (2.10.07-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1034501)
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hilmar Preusse
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
I'm not fully sure about the final name of the source package. The OpenSuSE
people name it texlive-context-bin, maybe I'll use a similar naming.
* Package name: luametatex
Package: release-notes
Followup-For: Bug #1033877
Control: retitle -1 "general version mismatch in release notes."
Dear Maintainer,
all information in section "x.y.z. Desktops and well known packages"
are still outdated. When one compares that section from
https://www.debian.org/releases/bookwor
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: texlive-b...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:texlive-base
Please unblock package src:texlive-base. I did not upload the
package to unstable, I'd like to hear your
0 +0100
+++ texlive-extra-2022.20230122/debian/changelog 2023-02-15 13:55:21.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+texlive-extra (2022.20230122-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Apply patch for ooffice.4ht to fix conversion LaTeX ->
+OOffice documents (Closes: #1033008).
+
+ -- Hilmar Preusse
Package: nagios-plugins-basic
Version: 2.3.3-4
Followup-For: Bug #516097
Please note that the PR related to the upstream issue was merged
to the master branch today so it will be part in one of the next
releases. Consider the patch in one of the next uploads.
Hilmar
-- System Information:
Debian
ASED; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1032354)
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
--
sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hilmar Preusse
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: srcpd
Version : 2.1.5
Upstream Contact: Guido Scholz
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/srcpd/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
On 25.02.23 Gard Spreemann (g...@nonempty.org) wrote:
Hi Gard,
> Installing a combination like
>
> texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-recommended texlive-latex-extra
> texlive-pictures texlive-luatex texlive-pictures-doc
>
> on a fresh Bullseye system with no TeX packages present fails with
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"monitoring-plugins-check-oracle-health":
* Package name : monitoring-plugins-check-oracle-health
Version : 3.3.2.1-1
Upstream contact : Gerhard Laußer
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hilmar Preusse
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: monitoring-plugins-check-oracle-health
Version : 3.3.2.1
Upstream Contact: Gerhard Laußer
* URL : https://labs.consol.de/de/nagios/check_oracle_health
Source: gnustep-make
Version: 2.9.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_name_html as output d
Source: gnustep-dl2
Version: 0.12.0-15.1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens probably due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manu
Source: flite
Version: 2.2-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_name_html as output directory
Source: proofgeneral
Version: 4.4.1~pre170114-1.2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_name_html
Package: recode
Version: 3.6-24
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_name_html
Package: sharutils
Version: 1:4.15.2-8
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_na
Package: wdiff
Version: 1.2.2-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_name_html
1 - 100 of 1727 matches
Mail list logo
