It looks like my problems with the Dec 5 & 6 installer builds is due to the CD
burner. The Dec 6 build (debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
0faa173fe594afdb374944cfc6610743) doesn't exhibit the freezing behavior if I
burn the CD from another machine so I need to do some investigation of that
here.
On Friday 05 December 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> What is the MD5SUM of that image (of the .iso file)?
It is 98a3624d0b2a23a3832b603a1a89ff3e (debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso - Dec
5 daily build)
I thought about this last night. I'd never had a problem with an ISO
download and have gotten lazy
On Sunday 30 November 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> I have been able to perform an installation with an image built today
> using an external FireWire CD-ROM drive without any problems.
Interesting. I tried the Dec 5 daily build today and the machine freezes as
soon as the installer boot menu app
When drive #2 - the "CDROM mounted in a cheapo external
USB enclosure" mentioned in the original report - is used on the machine
profiled in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498834 the same
thing happens: the Etch installer runs fine, the Lenny installer has much
trouble.
I don
On Tue September 16 2008 17:09, Harry Mofo wrote:
> Sorry, "apx" is an abbreviation for approximate. I don't remember
> precisely with which kernel version the issue began. I remember there were
> some major ACPI changes and there were many other people for whom ACP
On Tue September 16 2008 08:17, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:53:32AM -0500, Harry Mofo wrote:
> > - have had to use "acpi=off" kernel parameter since apx version
> > 2.6.16.
>
> I have not been able to find what is "apx". Could you
I should add that cdrom-detect in the Sarge and Etch installers had no problem
with the firewire CDROM.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
(20080906-09:44)
Date: Sep 13 2008
Machine: Acer TM110 tablet
Processor: Intel Pentium M 900
Memory: 512MB
Partition
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
(20080906-09:44)
Date: Sep 13 2008
Machine: Abit KT7 motherboard (Via KT133 chipset), IDE HD & CDROM
Processor: Athl
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
(20080906-09:44)
Date: Sep 13 2008
Machine: MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum motherboard (nForce 3 Ultra chipset), IDE HD &
CD
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
(20080906-09:44)
Date: Sep 13 2008
Machine: Asus P55T2P4 motherboard (Intel 430HX chipset), IDE HD & CDROM
Processor
The same beta2 CD that failed on machine 1-3 is able to boot 2 others:
Machine #4: Dell Optiplex GX-1, CPU = Intel P3-450 (440BX chipset), RAM = 384MB
Machine #5: Acer TM110 tablet, CPU = Pentium M 900, RAM = 512 MB
Is it a coincidence that it fails on machines with an AMD processor and works
on
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-LennyBeta2-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Sep 6 2008
Machine #1: Motherboard = Asus P55T2P4, CPU = AMD K6-3 400, RAM = 256MB
Machine #2: Motherboard = Abit KT7 (Via KT
13 matches
Mail list logo
