Thanks for the report.
This has been fixed in 4.0.12 on https://github.com/gjwgit/wajig and to
be uploaded to Debian repository shortly.
Latest version of wajig (3.2.20) on https://github.com/gjwgit/wajig has
resolved the issue. Currently working on an update to Debian repo.
Regards,
Graham
Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking it was the gdebi GUI.
Regards,
Graham
On 28 March 2011 19:42, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 28 March 2011 10:19, Graham Williams wrote:
>> Does the command line use of gdebi exclude popups appearing? Seems
>> like a good idea, but I j
Does the command line use of gdebi exclude popups appearing? Seems
like a good idea, but I just wonder what changes occur to interactions
with wajig when we use gdebi instead of the current install method? If
none, and we automatically get dependencies when manually installing a
.deb, then yes - we
Fixed in 2.0.48.
Regards,
Graham
On 19 May 2010 22:46, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.38
> Severity: minor
>
> "dependees" is not a word; it should be "dependents". I suggest that
> to avoid future problems with this word you change it in the code as
> well as in the outp
Thanks Reuben. That is in wajig 2.0.47. I will aim to get that out in
the next day or so.
Regards,
Graham
On 28 April 2010 02:29, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.38
> Severity: minor
>
> Please use apt-get remove --auto-remove to implement remove-depend.
> This is simpler
Hi Reuben. I've changed the installr to use aptitude -r - will be in
next release.
Regards,
Graham
On 24 February 2010 01:27, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.38
> Followup-For: Bug #402598
>
>
> I just came across the same problem: it appeared that installr, aka
> recommen
Hi Eike,
Sorry I missed your email closing the bug. Thanks for that.
And thanks for the hint on how you resolved the problem.
Dirk Eddelbuettel has reported the same issue and suggests that it
looks like a dpkg/upgrade issue. Dirk's work around was (for the
record and for those who might also st
k for other
applications in your shell?
Regards,
Graham
2010/1/15 Eike Sauer
> Hello!
>
> Am Freitag, 15. Januar 2010 schrieb Graham Williams:
> > I'm not able to repeat this. Bash completion is working on the machines
> > I've tested. Could you give me some more det
Thanks for the bug report Eike.
I'm not able to repeat this. Bash completion is working on the machines I've
tested. Could you give me some more details please since without being able
to repeat it, it's a little difficult to debug.
Regards,
Graham
2010/1/15 Eike Sauer
> Package: wajig
> Vers
Closing this request.
Regards,
Graham
2009/10/27 Reuben Thomas
> 2009/10/26 Graham Williams :
> > Thanks for the wishlist report. However, I rely on this functionality
> > regularly. I think it is in line with wajig being an administrative tool,
> > not just a package man
Thanks for the wishlist report. However, I rely on this functionality
regularly. I think it is in line with wajig being an administrative tool,
not just a package manager. So I'd probably not entertain its removal. Happy
to fix it to work with Ubuntu if you know the fix.
Regards,
Graham
2009/10/
d.
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Reading extended state information
> Initializing package states... Done
> Reading task descriptions... Done
>
> Hope all this helps.
Yes it does. Thanks. It does look like
il this bug in apt-get is solved), thanks.
>
> 2009/4/30 Graham Williams
> >
> > Hi Jaime,
> >
> > Thanks for the bug report.
> >
> > Underneath, the dailyupgrade command is simply doing:
> >
> > apt-get --show-upgraded dist-upgrade
> >
>
Hi Jaime,
Thanks for the bug report.
Underneath, the dailyupgrade command is simply doing:
apt-get --show-upgraded dist-upgrade
so I would guess the same situation is there with apt-get.
Do you think instead this might be a wajig specific problem?
Otherwise could you reassign this to apt-g
Received Tue 05 Feb 2008 4:07am +1100 from Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.38
> Severity: normal
>
> Attempt to build 'cdbs' or 'fakeroot' and watch as wajig fails to
> build them with permission issues, while "sudo apt-get source -b"
> builds these without trouble.
>
> [si
Hi Reuben,
I'm looking to close out some long outstanding wajig "bugs."
I'm thinking to close this one - perhaps its a wishlist? Or
would you have some suggested code to update?
Thanks,
Graham
Received Mon 09 Jul 2007 9:13am +1000 from Reuben Thomas:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.36
> Severi
I believe this was fixed:
$ wajig show sim
Package: sim
Priority: optional
Section: net
Installed-Size: 7856
[...]
Regards,
Graham
Received Fri 23 Dec 2005 12:49am +1100 from Serge Matveev:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.31
> Severity: normal
>
> I thing the behaviour of aptitude is more
Package: ggobi
Version: 2.1.8-1
Severity: normal
Hi Dirk,
Maybe a wishlist rather than a bug?
On one of my servers I have /usr/share physcially located on another
partition, with a symlink back to /usr/share (for whatever bizarre
reason actually because I ran out of space on /usr). Not sure
Fixed in 2.0.40.
Received Tue 25 Nov 2008 8:04am +1100 from Leslie Viljoen:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.38
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
>
> Here's the fix. Not sure which version to patch against, so I'll just
> include some context (the fix is on line 3).
>
> elif command == "autoin
Received Sun 01 Jun 2008 10:47pm +1000 from Reuben Thomas:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Graham Williams wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the suggestions Reuben. Comments are below...
>>
>>
>> Received Sat 26 Apr 2008 6:20am +1000 from Reuben Thomas:
>>> Package: wajig
>
Thanks for the suggestions Reuben. Comments are below...
Received Sat 26 Apr 2008 6:20am +1000 from Reuben Thomas:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.38
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> I often go through my packages and purge configuration files of removed
> packages. It'd be nice to do at least one o
Maybe I need to have an alias so that "reportbug" is the same as "bug"
in wajig, but the command is there:
wajig bug wine
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 31 May 2008 2:51am +1000 from Karl Chen:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.38
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Suggestion: "wajig reportbug PKG" ru
Received Tue 08 Jan 2008 9:25pm +1100 from Anthony Campbell:
> Package: wajig
> Version: n
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> My installed version of wajig has just been removed owing to a
> dependency problem on python-apt, which in turn has other dependency
> proble
Package: gxine
Version: 0.5.11-4
Severity: important
gxine has started playing audio out of sync with video.
The audio is 2 seconds behind the video (repeatable).
It was working just fine a few days ago.
Seems to be the same irrespective of source (DVD, DVB, mpeg file)
I have not been able to tra
Hi Jonathon,
Thanks for the bug report below. I'm cleaning up the backlog of bugs
in wajig, and I can't replicate this bug at present. Does it still
happen for you?
Thanks,
Graham
Received Fri 31 Aug 2007 10:10am +1000 from Jonathan Wilson:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: normal
Thanks for the Bug report David.
The HTML format has changed and I'll have to parse it
differently. Will be fixed once I get a chance.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sun 23 Sep 2007 4:12am +1000 from David Liontooth:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: minor
>
>
> Not sure what happened
Received Fri 05 Oct 2007 4:13am +1000 from Jeff King:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 09:06:10PM +1000, Graham Williams wrote:
>
> > I've not been able to repeat. For example:
> >
> > $ time wajig new
> > [27 packages]
> > real0m0.996s
Received Tue 02 Oct 2007 1:36am +1000 from Jeff King:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.37
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Running "wajig new" takes a very long time:
>
> $ time wajig new
> [... wajig new output, 5 packages ...]
> real1m36.576s
> user1m35.570s
> sys 0m0.652s
>
> I haven't pr
Received Fri 14 Sep 2007 5:10am +1000 from Alex Malinovich:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.37
> Severity: normal
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Seems that a change on the website has rendered whichpkg largely
> useless.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wajig whichpkg /usr/lib/
Thanks Mikhail. That is a very good suggestion. If you had some code
changes to implement this I would be happy to include it. Otherwise it
may be a while before I get a chance to have a look at implementing
it.
Regards,
Graham
Received Thu 17 May 2007 3:03am +1000 from Mikhail Sokolov:
> Packa
Received Sat 12 May 2007 2:12am +1000 from Gary Koskenmaki:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.35
> Followup-For: Bug #422596
>
>
> I ran into this bug during an apt-get upgrade yesterday. After following the
> workarounds you gave to
> those who first reported this bug, I am still unable to res
Received Sat 12 May 2007 12:52am +1000 from Thomas Quas:
> Hm, what I get here is this:
>
> $ sudo apt-get remove wajig
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> wajig
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 79 not upg
Received Tue 08 May 2007 6:18am +1000 from Reuben Thomas:
> On Mon, 7 May 2007, Graham Williams wrote:
>
> >I'm not sure that the apt-file functionality provides anything more
> >than what is already in wajig? The locate functionality is called
> >"whichpkg&qu
Thanks for the suggestion.
I'm not sure that the apt-file functionality provides anything more
than what is already in wajig? The locate functionality is called
"whichpkg" in wajig (and perhaps I'll alias it to locate). Is there
other functionality you were looking for that apt-file provides and
w
Received Mon 19 Mar 2007 9:53am +1100 from Michael Gilbert:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: normal
>
> wajig currently suggests base-config, but this has been superseeded by
> locales. the wajig suggests should be modified to reflect this change.
>
> mike
Thanks. I have made th
Received Mon 19 Mar 2007 7:39am +1100 from Chris AtLee:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: normal
>
>
> wajig should depend on dselect since it requires it for the update
> command at least.
Thanks. I've made the change. It will appear in the next release of
wajig.
Regards,
Graham
un 05 Nov 2006 7:13am +1100 from Graham Williams:
> Thanks Reuben. That is a very good list of suggestions. I will start
> working my way through them. (May need patience things are quite
> busy at present.)
>
> Regards,
> Graham
>
> Received Sun 05 Nov 2006 4:54am +11
Thanks Reuben. That is a very good list of suggestions. I will start
working my way through them. (May need patience things are quite
busy at present.)
Regards,
Graham
Received Sun 05 Nov 2006 4:54am +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
> On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Graham Williams wrote:
>
> >Th
Received Fri 03 Nov 2006 10:25am +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: wishlist
>
> If you must have synonyms, please have list-commands group them.
> wajig's command list is too long to take in easily, which is why I
> don't think there should be synonyms, but a
Received Fri 03 Nov 2006 11:04am +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: minor
>
> A small thing, but a visual irritant.
Thanks. But where does this occur?
Regards,
Graham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Received Sat 09 Sep 2006 6:04pm +1000 from Francesco Potorti:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Wajig is missing a `verify' command (? la rpm -K) for checking a
> packag?s sum using debsums or whatever.
Do you know of specific debian commands to do this check?
Thanks,
Thanks for that. It has been fixed and will be in 2.0.35.
Received Fri 03 Nov 2006 10:40am +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: minor
>
> The command "list-section" is listed twice by list-commands. The
> second time it should be "list-commands".
>
> -- Syste
Thanks for the feedback. A good point. I'll double check I don;t use
it dynamically, and then consider removing it from the distributed
code.
Regards,
Graham
Received Thu 02 Nov 2006 11:23pm +1100 from Reuben Thomas:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: minor
>
> Why are you distributi
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll look into including it with the next
release.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 09 Sep 2006 6:04pm +1000 from Francesco Potorti:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Wajig is missing a `verify' command (? la rpm -K) for checking a
> packag?s s
Thanks for the bug report. The bug has been fixed in version 2.0.35.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 02 Sep 2006 1:39am +1000 from Reuben Thomas:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: normal
>
> e.g. at the moment on my etch system,
>
> wajig -t changelog gcc
>
> gives the following ou
Thanks for the bug report Reuben. I'll have a look into it shortly.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 02 Sep 2006 1:39am +1000 from Reuben Thomas:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: normal
>
> e.g. at the moment on my etch system,
>
> wajig -t changelog gcc
>
> gives the following ou
Received Mon 07 Aug 2006 8:46pm +1000 from Jeff King:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 02:30:46PM +1000, Graham Williams wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the additional information Jeff and confirmation of the
> > problem on AMD64. Without access to such a machine its a little tricky
> &g
Thanks for the additional information Jeff and confirmation of the
problem on AMD64. Without access to such a machine its a little tricky
to debug but I'll see what I can do.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sun 06 Aug 2006 6:23am +1000 from Jeff King:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Followup-For
Received Sat 29 Jul 2006 2:39am +1000 from David Liontooth:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.34
> Severity: normal
>
>
> On wajig dependents wajig I get this (also a couple of other contexts):
>
> /usr/bin/wajig: line 8: 28000 Segmentation fault /usr/bin/python -O
> $WAJIGDIR/wajig.py "$@"
Received Tue 20 Jun 2006 4:27am +1000 from David Liontooth:
> Graham Williams wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > Could you give some more context on where this message appears. I don't
> > get it with a "wajig update".
> >
> Interesting. This sort
Hi David,
Could you give some more context on where this message appears. I don't
get it with a "wajig update".
Regards,
Graham
Received Mon 19 Jun 2006 4:35pm +1000 from David Liontooth:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.33
> Severity: minor
>
>
> When issuing "wajig update", it gives the rec
Received Tue 06 Jun 2006 9:27pm +1000 from Francesco Potorti`:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.32
> Severity: normal
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wajig whichpkg /usr/share/fonts/X11/TTF
> JIG Warning: Could not contact the Debian server at
> packages.debian.org
> Perhaps it is
Received Mon 15 May 2006 9:44pm +1000 from Michael Vogt:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 06:48:04AM +1000, Graham Williams wrote:
> > Received Sat 13 May 2006 5:51am +1000 from Michael Vogt:
> > > I looked into wajigs code and it turns out that the problem is that
> > > the
Received Sat 13 May 2006 5:51am +1000 from Michael Vogt:
> Hi,
>
> I looked into wajigs code and it turns out that the problem is that
> the latest apt uses MMap inside the pkgTagFile that is used on a pipe
> from wajig. This obviously does no longer work. I'll investigate what
> can be done abou
Received Sat 15 Apr 2006 12:52pm +1000 from David Liontooth:
> Graham Williams wrote:
> >Hi David,
> >
> >Thank you for the bug report. Could you give me an example that
> >illustrates what you observe.
> >
> # just list linux-image-2.6.16-alsa-a
Hi David,
Thank you for the bug report. Could you give me an example that
illustrates what you observe.
Thanks,
Graham
Received Sat 15 Apr 2006 3:38am +1000 from David Liontooth:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.31
> Severity: minor
>
>
> wajig purge no longer changes the status of that pack
Package: gallery2
Version: 2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #359013
I finally managed to get to the gallery2 site admin page by replacing
gallery/ with gallery2/ in the URL several times. Then I was able to go
to the URL Rewrite module configuation and reactivate the Migration
option. My Gallery is now fu
Received Sun 09 Apr 2006 1:08pm +1000 from Ferenczi Viktor:
> Package: wajig
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> I've a default sudo and wajig installation on Debian Stable.
> When trying to perform administrative commands like install,
> hold, etc. wajig says "Acce
Received Sat 08 Apr 2006 9:28am +1000 from Francesco Potorti`:
> >Thanks. Has it ever worked for you?
>
> Yes. I always use wajig.
Thanks.
> >It looks like a problem with the apt_pkg package rather than wajig?
>
> apt-get worked when wajig failed. I could reinstall apt-get, maybe.
> How do
Thanks. Has it ever worked for you? It looks like a problem with the
apt_pkg package rather than wajig? I'll investigate.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 08 Apr 2006 2:58am +1000 from Francesco Potorti`:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.31
> Severity: important
>
> # wajig reinstall wajig
> Trace
Package: gramps
Version: 2.0.10-1
Severity: important
On starting up gramps:
XXX rd_object called with exception set
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/gramps/gramps.py", line 81, in ?
import gramps_main
File "/usr/share/gramps/gramps_main.py", line 59, in ?
import
Package: gallery2
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: important
I upgraded from 2.0.4-1. The web-based upgrade appeared to work just
fine.
Visiting /gallery2/ I can login, visit an album but then thumbnails are
not found and links go to /gallery/ instead of /gallery2/ and are not
found! If I can select an
Received Thu 02 Feb 2006 9:18am +1100 from John V. Belmonte:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.31
> Severity: normal
>
> The backports.org archive uses a dash in their archive name (sarge-backports).
> Apparently wajig strips dashes in its command line processing, so the
> following doesn't work:
>
Hi Calum,
Thank you for the bug report. I can't yet see what the problem is.
Could you do a "wajig update" priori to the "wajig toupgrade" (as the
user and separately as root) and let me know again the output of the
two "wajig toupgrade"s.
Thanks,
Graham
Received Sat 14 Jan 2006 2:03am +1100
Package: gnubiff
Version: 2.1.8-1
Severity: normal
I've been having this problem for some time, trying to find a
pattern to the behaviour - no success yet
Gnubiff works fine on startup and then for a few hours after
this, but then it stops noticing new email - i.e., the icon
does not chan
Received Tue 15 Nov 2005 1:04am +1100 from Yves-Alexis Perez:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.30
> Severity: normal
>
> After doing an update, wajig counts new packages to present some stats.
> It uses tail with a deprecated syntax: tail -|+N, while it should use tail
> -n -|+N, so it doesnt work
Received Wed 13 Jul 2005 3:25pm +1000 from Kamaraju Kusumanchi:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.29
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Hi,
>I love wajig and am hoping this would be easy to fix. When I have the
> /etc/bash_completion sourced in ~/.bashrc, I can do
>
> wajig install vim-co
>
> and it
Received Mon 07 Nov 2005 1:03am +1100 from John Belmonte:
> Graham, since you removed the implicit apt-get build-dep, this is likely
> no longer an issue for "wajig source". However, it may be worth
> investigating if other commands such as "wajig build" have a similar issue.
>
>
Yep. Now fix
Received Wed 28 Sep 2005 7:18pm +1000 from John V. Belmonte:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.29
> Severity: normal
>
> Bash completion does not include the list-log command. Please confirm that
> there are no others missing. Ideally the bash completion script would be
> generated from wajig its
Thanks for the feedback John. I've reverted the SOURCE command to not
call build-depend. This will be in 2.0.30.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 05 Nov 2005 2:49pm +1100 from John V. Belmonte:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.29
> Severity: normal
>
> Starting with wajig 2.0.26, the source command
Received Sat 05 Nov 2005 2:49pm +1100 from John V. Belmonte:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.29
> Severity: normal
>
> When running "wajig source", hitting Ctrl-C at the "Do you want to continue?"
> prompt causes wajig to behave as if you've entered yes.
Hi John,
Thanks for the bug report.
Cou
Received Sun 23 Oct 2005 5:34am +1000 from Florian Ragwitz:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.29
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello,
>
> it would be nice to be able to search for packages that build-depend on
> another. I don't like using grep-dctrl for that.
>
> TIA,
> Flo
Hi Flo,
Could you give s
Received Sun 09 Oct 2005 7:34am +1000 from David Fedoruk:
> HI:
>
> > I'm not sure why you think it might be a "critical" bug. It doesn't
> > render the system unusable. In fact, if it did overwrite sources.list
> > then I might even consider that a critical bug instead.
>
> I was thinking a
Received Sun 09 Oct 2005 5:49am +1000 from David Fedoruk:
> package: wajig
> replace: wajig
> version: 2.0.29
> replace: 2.0.20
> severity: critical
>
> I normally run wajig as an unprivialiged user from my home directory
> using sudo like I do for all other packages install related commands.
> W
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.41
Severity: normal
Since the upgrade of apt (supporting gpg) into unstable, after the
release of 3.1, my local archive no longer works? I've tried tracking
the problem down on and off over the past few weeks but to no
avail. Not sure if this is an apt problem or a probl
Hi David,
Thanks for the suggestion.
But I would put this one outside the scope of wajig. The UNOFFICIAL
command queries www.apt-get.org and you are probably able to request
there that the experimental package archive be included in their
list.
Regards,
Graham
Received Sat 17 Sep 2005 10:33pm +
ks in one and not the other.
Regards,
Graham
>
> >>>>> On 2005-08-10 02:38 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
>
> Graham> Thanks Karl. I did use aptitude for a while but it
> Graham> did not interact so well with apt-get and for various
> Graham&g
Thanks Karl. I did use aptitude for a while but it did not interact
so well with apt-get and for various reasons I reverted to apt-get.
you will find various comments in the code relating to the issues with
aptitude. There will also be some discussion of this over the years in
the BTS. Perhaps the
Received Sat 06 Aug 2005 12:55am +1000 from Karl Chen:
> >>>>> On 2005-08-04 13:14 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
>
> Graham> command = setroot + " sh -c '%s'" % command
>
> This would work for me, but won't work for people that ei
Received Fri 05 Aug 2005 1:00am +1000 from Karl Chen:
> >>>>> On 2005-07-30 15:06 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
>
> Graham> Thanks. But I was more wondering how the problem
> Graham> manifests itself. What happened that caused you to
> Graham>
Received Wed 03 Aug 2005 1:39pm +1000 from Mozai:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.29
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Unpacking wajig (from .../archives/wajig_2.0.29_all.deb) ...
> Setting up python2.3-apt (0.6.12.2) ...
> Setting up python-apt (0.6.12.2) ...
> Setting up wajig (2.0.29) ...
>
> margot:
Received Sat 30 Jul 2005 9:45am +1000 from Karl Chen:
> >>>>> On 2005-07-28 12:53 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
>
> Graham> After some testing, a problem with the proposed
> Graham> solution is that a user may have sudo set up with the
> Graham&g
Received Thu 28 Jul 2005 8:28am +1000 from Karl Chen:
> >>>>> On 2005-07-27 14:45 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
>
> Graham> Thanks Karl. I'll include this in the next release.
>
> Thanks!
Hi Karl,
After some testing, a problem with the proposed soluti
Received Thu 28 Jul 2005 7:11am +1000 from Karl Chen:
> >>>>> On 2005-07-27 02:56 PDT, Graham Williams writes:
>
> >> For some wajig commands, wajig executes "sudo command1 |
> >> sudo command 2...", which is impossible to authenticate
Received Wed 27 Jul 2005 6:07pm +1000 from Karl Chen:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.29
> Severity: normal
>
>
> For some wajig commands, wajig executes "sudo command1 |
> sudo command 2...", which is impossible to authenticate
> properly. Doing a "sudo -v" before any pipeline solves it.
Than
Thanks for the bug report Kamaraju. I'm currently looking into add
the completion as suggested.
Received Wed 13 Jul 2005 3:25pm +1000 from Kamaraju Kusumanchi:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.29
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Hi,
>I love wajig and am hoping this would be easy to fix. When I hav
Received Sun 10 Jul 2005 9:25am +1000 from John V. Belmonte:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.29
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I'd like a wajig command that lists installed packages with distribution
> info (i.e. stable, testing, unstable), similar to apt-show-versions.
Thanks for the suggestion John
Package: apt-move
Version: 4.2.23
Followup-For: Bug #316492
I had the same problem. Seems like the new apt provides
libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.9 and apt-move requires
libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3.
My fix was:
wajig source apt-move
cd apt-move-4.2.23
wajig build apt-move
wajig install apt-move
Received Tue 21 Jun 2005 12:09am +1000 from John V. Belmonte:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.27
> Severity: normal
>
> When "wajig which-pkg" is given a package name with the '+' character, it
> returns a cryptic message. I expect the following command to yield
> libsigc++-1.2-dev, etc.
>
> $ w
Received Sat 18 Jun 2005 1:10pm +1000 from David Liontooth:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.27
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> It would be very useful to be able to install all new or all newupgrade
> packages,
> perhaps simply by allowing "install" as a parameter to those commands:
>
> waji
Received Thu 16 Jun 2005 5:39am +1000 from David Liontooth:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.24 (reproduced in 2.0.27)
> Severity: minor
>
>
> If you have bug report checking turned on, and respond n to an upgrade
> because of a bug
> report, you get a messy error -- this may be a feature, but s
Received Sat 11 Jun 2005 12:21pm +1000 from Stephen Gran:
> This one time, at band camp, Graham Williams said:
> > I'm using "hdparm -a8 -u" on /dev/hda (a CD/DVD).
> > I need to do this so that DVD viewing is smooth
> > (at least this is a solution that works
Package: hdparm
Version: 6.1-2
Severity: minor
I'm using "hdparm -a8 -u" on /dev/hda (a CD/DVD).
I need to do this so that DVD viewing is smooth
(at least this is a solution that works) .
Wanted to maintain this over a reboot.
Editted /etc/hdparm.conf as suggested in README.Debian
Symlinked /etc
Received Thu 02 Jun 2005 5:46am +1000 from Graham Williams:
> Received Thu 02 Jun 2005 4:09am +1000 from August Mayer:
> > Package: wajig
> > Version: 2.0.25
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > It is sometimes useful to specify the target archive for dist-upgrade.
Received Thu 02 Jun 2005 4:09am +1000 from August Mayer:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.25
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It is sometimes useful to specify the target archive for dist-upgrade. For
> example, to check whether new archives are in experimental, I would do
> apt-get -t experimental dist-u
Received Tue 26 Apr 2005 12:24pm +1000 from Jerry Quinn:
...
> > wajig list-scripts most
>
> I'd want to see something like:
>
> package most-2.3-1 scripts
> [postinst]
> #!/bin/sh
> echo "hi there"
>
> [prerm]
> echo "Are you sure"
Thanks Jerry. I've implemented this for the next versio
Received Sat 02 Apr 2005 4:40pm +1000 from David Liontooth:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.24
> Severity: minor
>
>
> A persistent error has snuck into recent versions of wajig. When listing
> status or
> status-match, it doesn't show Previous and Now for installed packages:
Hi David,
Is thi
Received Mon 25 Apr 2005 3:23pm +1000 from Jerry Quinn:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.25
> Severity: wishlist
>
> This would be useful output. I'd just put a letter in front of each
> package name.
Thanks for the suggestion. This has been implemented and will be
released in version 2.0.26:
Received Mon 25 Apr 2005 3:23pm +1000 from Jerry Quinn:
> Package: wajig
> Version: 2.0.25
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I'm looking for an equivalent to rpm -q --scripts .
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for the bug report. It looks like a useful idea. A little
more detail would help me though. What would you
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
