Package: alsa-base
Version: 1.0.23+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
If I unload all the alsa devices (by the command "sudo alsa unload"), then
connect the single USB audio device to my PC, "lsmod" shows "snd_usb_audio" is
loaded. However, the device numbering configuration is broken. For example,
$ ls
I don't agree with the concept of "UTF-8-CJK" because it's over
exaggerated. Is it a locale dependent issue, or character encoding
issue?
According to UAX#11, your point doesn't make sense because your
reference just mention about character mapping. Instead, "When
processing or displaying data"
At Sun, 27 May 2007 12:27:59 -0700,
Yoshio Nakamura wrote:
>
> lv 4.51
>
> When 'lv' displays a file that has a filename longer than the terminal
> width, it displays the full filename at the bottom of the screen
> (taking more than one line), but this forces the first line of the
> file off of t
At Wed, 23 May 2007 11:53:28 +0900,
Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA wrote:
> > Thanks for your report. However, we still provide ttf-kochi-mincho,
> > but it'll be deprecate because it's not maintained these days. I'll
> > add such statement for these packages. Could you use ttf-sazanami and
> > test it agai
At Tue, 15 May 2007 20:40:07 +0900,
Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA wrote:
> following glyphs become thin when bold
> on gucharmap, iceweasel, and so on.
>
> * U+30AD KATAKANA LETTER KI
> * U+30AE KATAKANA LETTER GI
> * U+30B7 KATAKANA LETTER SI
> * U+30B8 KATAKANA LETTER ZI
> * U+30F3 KATAKANA LETTER N
> * U+
At Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:03:26 -0800,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Fixed
> From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:35:27 +0100
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Version: 1.14i-10.1
Thanks for your help! I'll check the pat
At Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:22:32 +0100,
Rob Andrews wrote:
> Package: lha
> Version: 1.14i-10
> Severity: normal
>
> lha is not being built for the amd64 port. I thought that maybe the
> build was failing, but after apt-get -b source lha successfully built
> and packaged it, I figured this was not the
> libsmbios-dev does not provide libsmbios.so, making it impossible to link
> against libsmbios.
libsmbios1 has libsmbios.so - or do I misunderstand your bug report?
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
I saw the following from
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=391828
> I'm just commiting a fix for this in my archive. I'll try to make a
> release with this fix and a few others shortly.
Do you have any plans to upload a newer version of the package?
Now the bug is
Julien, Mohammed,
At Sun, 6 Aug 2006 19:51:47 +0200,
Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > > Do you want to use X-based multi-window tracer? (yes or no) [no] touch
> > > configure-stamp
>
> There is a missing space that prevents the build when using da
At Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:04:34 +0800,
Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > But ttf-kochi-* fonts became obsolete because upstream authors stopped
>
> OK, but dpkg -p ttf-kochi-* still talks about them like they are
> great. The user is not warned...
Exactly. I'll change the descriptions of ttf-kochi-* packages
At Mon, 15 May 2006 05:49:16 +0800,
Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: ttf-kochi-mincho-naga10
> Version: 1.0.20030809-4
> Severity: normal
>
> The characters at U+8392 and those nearby are wrong!
> Compare ttf-kochi-gothic.
Absolutely. I guess authors did not paste characters correctly. I
reported
Dear Christian,
> lm_batmon only works with APM, not with ACPI. I've created a small
> patch that enables ACPI support. It was sucessfully tested on a
> Thinkpad T30 with vanilla Kernel 2.6.7.
Thank you for your ACPI modification. Finally, your patch have been
merged into the upstream original
0
> -0600
> @@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
> -/etc/X11/app-defaults/XIpmsg
> -/etc/X11/ja_JP.eucJP/app-defaults/XIpmsg
> diff -Naur xipmsg-0.8088/debian/control xipmsg-0.8088.nmu/debian/control
> --- xipmsg-0.8088/debian/control 2006-05-21 00:34:55.0 -0500
> +++ xipmsg-0.8088.nmu/debi
> I use cifs to mount a couple of samba shares and files with long names are not
> displayed. When I access the same shares, using LAN Browsing in konqueror, the
> files are there. It looks like it has too do with the total length (inclusive
> directories) of the filename. for example:
>
> /incomi
At 16 Feb 2006 13:00:08 -0500,
Greg Stark wrote:
> > The man pages come from manpages-dev.
>
> It seems like the necessary #defines should be included in each man page along
> with the necessary #includes. I suspect I'll be tilting at windmills trying to
> convince people of this though.
Can we r
At Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:50:11 +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> you are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
> glibc. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
> are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
> I would be grateful if you could take t
At Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:29:43 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 10:38:47AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:22:22 -0500,
> > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > Steve Langasek agreed. I am planning to bump the requirement up from
>
At Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:26:29 +0100,
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Wow, this is a bug come back from the dead. I read the summary in glibc
> and think it's wierd. For example, the counts supposedly showing
> "Eastern Standard Time" to be more popular than "Australia Eastern
> Standard Time" are bo
Thanks, I see the difference between pt_BR and pt. I put it in.
-- gotom
At Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:18:35 +,
Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> pt.po it's for European Portuguese (Portuguese) and pt_BR.po it's for
> Brazilien Portuguese.
> One doesn't replace the other.
At Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:45:37 +00
At Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:22:22 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Steve Langasek agreed. I am planning to bump the requirement up from
> 2.2.whatever to 2.4.0 for i486 and powerpc; i486 in order to enable
> floating stacks, and powerpc because we've been getting bug reports
> that indicate that stati
At Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:26:04 +,
Rui Branco wrote:
> Portuguese translation for glibc's debconf messages by Simão Pedro
> Cardoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Feel free to use it.
>
> For translation updates please contact last translator and/or CC the
> Portuguese translation team
Thanks for your w
At Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:42:14 +0100,
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The script /etc/init.d/glibc.sh can not be sourced, as it contain
> 'exit 0' at the end of the script. This is against policy, specifying
> that all .sh scripts in /etc/rcS.d/ will be sourced. I discovered
> this while fixing sysv-r
At Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:43:48 +1100,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The official list of timezones for Australia, as provided by the Australian
> Government, does not include EST anywhere on the page. AEST is the correct
> abbreviation.
>
> http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia-13time";>
>
>
At Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:13:25 -0800,
Edward Buck wrote:
> I guess the problem then is in the ipv6 support and how it implements
> domains in the search path. Instead of doing ipv6, then ipv4 for
> mx1.hotmail.com, it runs through all possible ipv6 queries, including
> exhausting all domains in the
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.14-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I request you to change .config settings as follows:
CONFIG_OBSOLETE_OSS_USB_DRIVER=y
CONFIG_USB_AUDIO=m
It's an obsolete device driver, but it's useful with some USB audio
devices. Because alsa snd-
At Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:27:15 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On the latest i386 Sid, gcc-4.0 does not build from source, on my machine,
> > and on a buildd (see the logs). With dash as sh, I get:
>
> this is known, we're waiting on proper 64bit support from glibc. I'd
> like to downgrade this one
severity 328795 normal
thanks
> [1] Your packages has not had a maintainer upload for more than
> three years.
>
> [2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**)
>
> [3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you
> might be MIA
>
> [4] (
At Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:05:42 -0400,
Rob Warren wrote:
> I've just installed sarge onto the second netwinder without any
> problems with libc 2.3.2.ds1-22 with the netboot image, kernel 2.4.27.
>
> ...then I tried to boot from the kernel I was previously using (2.2.19)
> and got the dreaded resul
At Thu, 8 Sep 2005 06:26:19 -0700 (PDT),
Kokushoku Karasu wrote:
> This has to be the weirdest bug I've seen.
>
> Earlier I had a strange exit of FVWM, at the time I had been messing with
> the window for k3b, then I see the kdm greeting screen. Conclusion,
> something crashed.
>
> After two mor
At Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:41:17 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> glibc-2.3.5 doesn't have the fpsetdefaults function anymore, which was
> available in 2.3.2. Is the omission intended? If yes, is there a
> replacement function? Currently the python fpectl module fpectl FTBFS.
I guess python misdetected O
At Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:00:23 +0200,
Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > Why is this "unconditionally" happenned? What setting does this cause
> > this problem?
>
> Because bash calls getpwuid() to initialize the value of $SHELL before
> executing the script.
I understand the whole story - this problem could
At Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:17:09 +0200,
Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Attached is a new version of the localedef.1 manual page
> > (debian/local/manpages/localedef.1) and a diff against the previous
> > version (the former is there so that people who want to review it can
> > more easily get a complete vers
At Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:48:20 +0200,
Gabor Gombas wrote:
> Well, if /bin/sh is bash, then it is not weird at all, it is the same
> "bash vs. NSS" problem that came up several times in the past (last time
> quite recently on debian-devel). Previously it only happened with NSS
> modules that link to l
At Wed, 31 Aug 2005 01:12:25 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> /etc/init.d/glibc.sh uses dpkg --compare-versions extensively.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% which dpkg
> /usr/bin/dpkg
>
> Init scripts, at least this early, can't use /usr. It isn't mounted yet!
Good point, I missed this issue. I don'
At Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:52:30 +0200,
Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> No file-rc, and no long running (bash or other) processes. Here's
> process list just before /etc/init.d/umountfs runs the umount command,
> with only kernel daemons removed (they're not interesting, and too
> many of them):
>
> UID
At Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:28:01 -0400,
Thomas Evans wrote:
> When you state "Upstream already moved to NPTL", do you mean the mainline
> libc
> development, or do youe mean that Debian/alpha libc is moving to NPTL?
The mainline libc, not debian alpha glibc. But I guess adding debian
alpha NPTL is
At Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:18:01 -0400,
Thomas Evans wrote:
> Threads that have properly called pthread_detach() and pthread_exit()
> are not being cleaned up and remain in the process list as
> until the parent exits.
>
> This does not occur on systems running "testing" and has appeared only
> re
At Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:16:14 -0400,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> #317082 is "moreinfo". Has a decision been made on how to fix this?
> If not, frankly it should be downgraded to "important", because it only
> hurts biarch -- meaning it isn't actually a blocker for any single
> subarchitecture -- and
severity 325226 important
thanks
At Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:07:17 +0200,
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> It seems that on amd64, all binaries and libraries in the libc6
> pacakge have a wrong dynamic linker in the binaries.
>
> ldd /lib/libc.so.6
> /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x002a95556000)
> ldd /u
At Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:13:36 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > * debian/control.in/powerpc: New libc6-(dev-)powerpc packages for ppc64.
>
> This name "powerpc" is confusable with the current powerpc - could I
> rename it from powerpc to ppc32?
Note that ppc32
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:44:05 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> * debian/control.in/powerpc: New libc6-(dev-)powerpc packages for ppc64.
This name "powerpc" is confusable with the current powerpc - could I
rename it from powerpc to ppc32?
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
At Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:57:00 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:53:05PM +0200, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> > GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > At Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:56:04 +0200,
> > > Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> >
At Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:56:04 +0200,
Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> rc1119 root mem REG8,9 217016 228931 /var/db/nscd/passwd
This is another file which is not /var/run/nscd/dbXX.
> This is the process list at the same time (kernel daemons and ps
> itself excluded):
>
> UID
reassign 323849 libterm-readline-gnu-perl
severity 323849 important
merge 304604 323849 322746
thanks
At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:30:59 -0700,
Ross Boylan wrote:
> My system is mostly testing, but I upgraded parts to unstable,
> including glibc. During that same upgrade, I got the error:
> ---
At Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:59:46 +0200,
Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:14:43 +0200,
> > Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> >> With the latest changes in nscd functionality, namely using persistent
> >> data
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:14:43 +0200,
Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> With the latest changes in nscd functionality, namely using persistent
> database in /var/db/nscd, /var partition can't be cleanly umounted. I
> tried to avoid the problem by disabling persistent database, but even
> that didn't help becau
At Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:27:43 -0700,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - cmpult Y, X, RV
> > + cmpule Y, X, RV
> > excb
> > mt_fpcr $f3
> > ldt $f0, 0(sp)
>
> > but I don't have time for testing.
>
> Thanks, after looking at the diff between divq.S and divqu.S and
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:30:30 -0400,
Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Actually, to be completely correct, the right value should be
> "Conflicts: e2fsprogs (< 1.35-7)", as linux-gate.so started being
> filtered in e2fsprogs 1.35-7.
OK, I changed from (<= 1.37-2sarge1) to (<< 1.35-7). Thanks!
Regards,
--
severity 324795 normal
tags 324795 moreinfo
thanks
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:11:30 -0400,
Rob Warren wrote:
> I was upgrading from woody to sarge when apt-get choked on upgrading
> libc6 from 2.2.5-11.8 to 2.3.2.ds1-22 with a message along the lines of
> 'can't seek in file xx'. dmesg would rep
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:46:34 +0900,
Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 08:17:58AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 07:49:23PM +0900, Simon Horman [Horms] wrote:
> > > long time no see. It seems that the problem is indeed fixed if you get
> > > the sarge (or later) version
At Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:38:15 -0400,
Rob Warren wrote:
> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
>
> Keeping up with Stable the new release for libc6 is broken. dpkg dies
> on the upgrade.
Did you try to upgrade from woody to sarge? Or from sarge to the
current sid? Please imagine 2.3.2.ds1-22 is broken - many a
s for their
> consideration.
I don't know what the actual problem is, but I fixed this kind of ldd
filtering problem for mkinitrd during the final stage of sarge
development. Does this help you?
* GOTO Masanori
- Make mkinitrd work with new ldd format which change is introduced
in g
At Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:54:07 +0200,
Michael Banck wrote:
> attached is a dpatch which fixes gcc-4.0 build issues on hurd-i386. The
> parts by Roland McGrath have been taken from CVS, the part by Alfred M.
> Szmidt has not been applied yet and was thus taken from
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc
At Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:52:08 -0400,
Ravi Nanavati wrote:
> After upgrading libc6 (from 2.3.2.ds1-22) to 2.3.5-3 I am no longer able to
> compile and link Verilog simulations with Synopsys VCS. The problem appears
> to be missing symbols in libc6. The error messages I get are as follows:
> gcc -
At Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:55:42 -0700,
Blars Blarson wrote:
> glbic failed to build on a sparc buildd. It is currently building on
> my sparc pbuilder, I'll report when the build finishes.
I changed it, -5 should fix this problem.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 03:06:12 +0200,
Zoran Dzelajlija wrote:
> Well, for one thing, upgrading libc6 triggers the breakage on
> unrelated, already installed packages - and there's a lot of those
> linked to eg. libssl-0.9.7.so. BTW. looks like there are some patches
> which mitigate this issue, see
At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:33:51 -0700,
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> (Debian glibc maintainers: this message is re: bug#321724. Does there
> need to be a kernel version >= 2.4.27 restriction on i386 when upgrading
> to libc6 2.3.5? Thank you.)
I'll put the patch to -4 that mitigates this problem. Of course,
At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:56:19 +0200,
Andreas Barth wrote:
> during building openmotif on sparc, this error happened:
>
> gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-unused -Wno-comment -o .libs/periodic periodic.o
> ../../../lib/Xm/.libs/libXm.so -L/usr/X11R6/lib
> ../../../lib/Mrm/.libs/libMrm.so
> /build/buildd/op
> if (errno != ENOMEM && errno != EFAULT)
Thanks, this is one of the best bug that I have produced, I go to
sleep now...
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:12:31 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > I don't know what the exact problem is - Does this problem occur with
> > 2.4 kernel? Can all furious PaX reports be fixed using 2.6 kernel?
>
> This is separate from the PaX problems - it's stock 2.4. I don't know
> why it happens
At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:24:14 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> There is already an inofficial buildd for the ppc64 architecture
> running for 'unstable'. The respective ppc64 package archive is located at
>
> deb http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/gcc4 unstable main
>
> and almost 95% of all sou
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 22:05:42 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> I guess you will generally have many more issues than this one when you
> try to build 64-bit packages on a 32-bit buildd (e.g. compiling and
> running 64-bit programs from configure scripts, running 'make check' or
> 'make test' targe
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:41:39 +0100,
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > At Mon, 23 May 2005 23:28:01 +0300,
> > Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> >> The English output of "localedef --help" contains this:
> >>
> >> --posixBe strictly POSIX conform
> >>
> >> The last word should surely be "confor
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:00:23 +0100,
Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I don't think this is just a dpkg-dev bug, these "bi-arch" systems need
> to provide ldd or an equivalent that can read either form of shared
> library that it would support.
>
> objdump isn't a solution either, while it sometimes ca
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:04:35 +0200,
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:47:43AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > Please try: ls -al /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive .
> > If it's existed, then try to remove this file and invoke locale -a again.
> > I guess it&
At Sat, 13 Aug 2005 08:25:32 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Will the separation character problem (',' vs. '|') in the glibc
> Build-Depends also be fixed?
OK, fixed in cvs. Thanks.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Hi,
These bugs are marked as important when glibc 2.3.2.ds1 is used in
sarge. Nowadays we have new glibc 2.3.5-3 in unstable. Could you
test dbus-1 with new glibc? I guess this problem is already fixed.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
At Mon, 23 May 2005 23:28:01 +0300,
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> The English output of "localedef --help" contains this:
>
> --posixBe strictly POSIX conform
>
> The last word should surely be "conforming".
You'll find "POSIX conform" has been used like a noun via google.
I thin
At Sun, 07 Aug 2005 09:43:06 +0200,
Marc Haber wrote:
> $ locale -a
> locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
> C
> POSIX
> de_DE
> de_DE.iso88591
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> de_DE.utf8
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> deutsch
> german
> $ dpkg --list locales
> Desired=Unknown/Insta
At Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:21:35 -0500,
Mark Nipper wrote:
> I should not this doesn't happen on my testing machines
> with libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22. I diff'ed the standard nscd.conf
> between the two versions and aside from additional comment junk,
> the apparent problems seem to be these:
> ---
> >
At Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:09:38 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > 08:47 mprotect(0xb000, 4096,
> > PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC|PROT_GROWSDOWN) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid
> > argument)
> > 08:47 mprotect(0xbfff8000, 32768, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) =
> > -1 EFAULT (Bad address)
> > 08:55
merge 322953 317082
severity 317082 serious
thanks
At Sat, 13 Aug 2005 20:28:23 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> When building 'glibc' on in a clean chroot on powerpc/unstable,
> I get the following error:
>
> touch /glibc-2.3.5/stamp-dir/install_libc
> Installing ppc64
> rm -rf /glibc-2.3.5/debia
At Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:05:38 -0400,
Joey Hess wrote:
> > I changed now. BTW, is it ok to leave dependency "Depends:
> > libnss-dns-udeb"?
>
> Good point, we do currently include libc on at least one image (boot
> floppy) without libnss-dns, so it's not really a dependency and the
> dependency sho
At Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:51:18 -0400,
Joey Hess wrote:
> libc6-udeb depends on libnss-files-udeb, which is unnecessary since most
> d-i images don't need that udeb at all, and the udebs that do need it
> seems to depend on it (openssh-client-udeb, openssh-server-udeb).
I changed now. BTW, is it ok
At Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:24:26 -0300 (BRT),
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> 3 days after restaring Apache and no more errors. Maybe close the bug?
We'll fix glibc to introduce restarting apache question again.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
At Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:36:37 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:44:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:14:55AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > "PPC libc6 should be built with TLS and NPTL"
> > > We have new enough GCC now, and new glibc
kg-buildpackage -b
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is glibc
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 2.3.5-3
> dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture powerpc
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: g
At Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:50:25 +0200,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> After upgrading from the sarge libc6, sshd on my computer no longer
> accepted connections.
>
> Restarting sshd fixed the problem.
>
> It seems the "restart services" question in the postinst should be
> asked for upgrades from < 2.3.5 .
>
At Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:54:49 +0200,
Vincent Danjean wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:45:14PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > Package: paje.app
> > Version: 1.3.2-4
> > Severity: important
> >
> > When I invoked to start Paje, I got an error. It seems this
>
At Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:47:48 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:46:40PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:43:43 -0400,
> > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > Are libc6-i686 and libc6 the same version? Have they been upgraded
> &
At Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:43:43 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Are libc6-i686 and libc6 the same version? Have they been upgraded
> since you last restarted apache?
Note that during glibc 2.3.5-2, I add this check code. If version
number between libc6-i686 and libc6 are not matched, the post/pre
Package: paje.app
Version: 1.3.2-4
Severity: important
When I invoked to start Paje, I got an error. It seems this
application is not usable entirely.
Warning - GNUSTEP_SYSTEM_ROOT is not set - using /usr/lib/GNUstep/System
2005-08-08 15:43:36.000 Paje[4457] NOTE: Only one displa
tags 207391 fixed-upstream
thanks
I fixed this problem during glibc 2.3.90. It'll be fixed
automatically in the next glibc major update.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Mon, 23 May 2005 18:07:02 +0200,
Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> I have a static binary that runs well on sarge and sid systems. On this
> system
> with libc6 from experimental, it fails:
>
> $ ./multivideo.static
>
> Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library
> multivideo.static: dynamic-li
Hi,
At Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:11:47 +0100,
Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> I've noticed that the problem disappears (did not manifest itself
> in 6 hours) if I remove the unneeded "-lpthread" in the link
> line.
>
> The "-lpthread" comes via the "pkg-config --libs libxml-2.0" call
> but is otherwise unnee
severity 303263 serious
thanks
I met this bug during the recent glibc compilation. I bump up the
severity of this bug. James, please rebuild and upload it again. If
you have no time to do so, I can help you to do NMU.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
At Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:02:46 -0400,
Josh Metzler wrote:
> As far as I understand, #318979 caused xorg-x11 to FTBFS on sparc because it
> included which used __user but failed to include
> where __user was defined. This was apparently fixed in
> linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1. So, #318979
At Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:09:50 +0200,
Denis Barbier wrote:
> > I've checked and all localedata is available in SUPPORTED with the
> > current 2.3.5-3 development in svn - it'll be OK when 2.3.5 is into
> > unstable.
>
> According to /usr/share/i18n/locales/[EMAIL PROTECTED] files, Uzbek
> language ca
At Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:38:17 +0200,
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Before applying a patch, I would like to hear why this bug affects
> > only sparc?
>
> No, it's not sparc-specific. What I meant is that, from a release
> management point of view, it is preventing xorg-x11 from being a
> candidate
At Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:51:34 +0300 (EEST),
Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> > ulimit -a
> core file size(blocks, -c) 0
> data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) unlimited
> max memory size (kbytes, -m) un
At Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:24:19 +0200,
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > This bug also affects xorg-x11, which FTBFS with current l-k-h as some input
> > drivers #include
>
> Hello,
>
> Please consider prioritizing this bug, since we can't get a first
> build of xorg-x11 on SPARC until it gets fixed (pre
At Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:04:36 +1200,
Dru wrote:
> >According to http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121 ,
> >it was marked as invalid. I think it's OK to close this report.
> >If you have another information, please let us know.
>
> Yip its ok appears to have been working fine this
Guilherme, Leslie,
I'm Debian Project GNU C Library package developer. Leslie, I got the
following report from Guilherme that reported glibc.po in pt_BR
translation has a typo:
http://bugs.debian.org/319422/
At Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:36:43 -0300,
Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
> As you not
At Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:18:26 -0500,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> This does not seem to be something that changes in make are
> going to fix. make essentially makes a glob (3) call; and that
> library call is where the segmentation violation occurs. Considering
> that the number of entries i
tags 296532 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
> I'm not sure what caused this. Every time ldconfig is run, it spews:
>
> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link
>
> So this gets kind of annoying every time a library package is installed.
>
> It hasn't happened until recently. A strace log
tags 299137 fixed-upstream
thanks
It should be fixed in 2.3.5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 298488 fixed-upstream
thanks
It should be fixed in 2.3.5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 175163 fixed-upstream
thanks
It should be fixed in 2.3.5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 165921 woody
tags 205039 woody
thanks
Both two bugs are marked as woody because it's used for woody -> sarge
transition.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 275 matches
Mail list logo
