On 16-01-2013 21:34, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 05:55:19PM +0100, Gökçen Eraslan wrote:
>>
>> 32x32 is really small, indeed :) I'm not really familiar with Debian
>> packaging so the decision is, of course, up to you.
>
> Regarding the resolu
On 16-01-2013 17:03, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Gökçen,
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 04:52:35PM +0100, Gökçen Eraslan wrote:
>>>
>>> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/king/trunk/debian/king.install?r1=12798&r2=12797&pathrev=12798
>
On 16-01-2013 16:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 04:09:48PM +0100, Gökçen Eraslan wrote:
>>
>> By the way, why don't you use bigger king/installer/kingicon-orig.png
>> file as the icon file instead of king.xpm file which is 32x32?
>
> The ration
nclude the desktop file earlier, but this is also
fine.
By the way, why don't you use bigger king/installer/kingicon-orig.png
file as the icon file instead of king.xpm file which is 32x32?
Regards.
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:15:48PM +0100,
Package: king
Version: 2.21.120420-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Since "king" package lacks desktop file, it is not accessible by the end users
who typically use the launchers of their d
5 matches
Mail list logo
