currently testing a solution and plan to file a bug reports
soon, hopefully with a proposed workaround).
Regards,
On 2024-04-11 20:33, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:39:40PM -0700, Flavio Veloso Soares wrote:
Hi Noah - I guess I'll be doing bullseye->bookworm insta
2024 at 06:48:56PM -0700, Flavio Veloso Soares wrote:
Is this the correct forum to report issues/ask question about the official
Debian images on AWS?
The BTS isn't really the correct forum to ask questions about any Debian
topics, but it is the right place to report issues.
Note that
Hi,
Any update on this?
Is this the correct forum to report issues/ask question about the
official Debian images on AWS?
On 2024-02-18 13:09, Flavio Veloso Soares wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Bookworm's release notes clearly states that "systemd-resolved was
> not, and still i
Package: cloud.debian.org
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: flavi...@magnux.com
Hello,
Bookworm's release notes clearly states that "systemd-resolved was
not, and still is not, the default DNS resolver in Debian"
(https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html
Sorry, please disregard the last email. It was sent in error.
FYI:
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Why is a negative review showing on V2 profile page for
Star Orthodontics?
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 11:28:06 -0700
From: Nadeem Kassam
To: James R
CC: Flavio Veloso Soares , Malcolm Turner
(...)
When reviewing the profile
myself now. From a pure technical POV, I think that the current choice
-- a kernel tuned up for desktop use -- is the one that should require a
benchmark to be adopted, but I get the message.
On 2020-11-22 5:49 p.m., Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 03:53:32PM -0800, Flavio Veloso So
On 2020-11-22 2:28 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 13:45 -0800, Flavio Veloso Soares wrote:
[Resending: just noticed that the reply I sent on Oct 23 didn't include
b.d.o]
I don't think the article is about the same thing we're talking here.
CONFIG_PREEMPT* opti
ot;, and that reduces overall computing power
available to the instance. This is like double-paying for something you
don't need.
On 2020-10-23 6:04 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 13:43 -0700, Flavio Veloso wrote:
Package: linux-image-cloud-amd64
Version: 4.19+105+deb10u7
Sev
Or uncheck the box "Allow Thunderbird to send technical and interaction
data to Mozilla" within the Edit - Preferences - Privacy & Security menu.
Shouldn't this be the default?
I was shockingly surprised to see this enabled after TB upgraded. If
memory serves me, telemetry is always off by def
Package: linux-image-cloud-amd64
Version: 4.19+105+deb10u7
Severity: wishlist
Since cloud images are mostly run for server workloads in headless
environments accessed via network only, it would be better if
"linux-image-cloud-*" kernels were compiled with CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
("No Forced Pree
Package: mstmp-mta
Version: 1.8.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
The /usr/sbin/sendmail symlink that points to /usr/bin/msmtp should be
created by the "msmtp" package, not by "msmtp-mta". Rationale:
1. In msmtp context, the "/usr/sbin/sendmail" path represents only the
MUA side of the email system
tes:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:15:29PM -0700, Flavio Veloso wrote:
Since linux-image-cloud-* packages are created for cloud environments --
read: servers which do not need desktop-level responsiveness --, wouldn't it
be beneficial to build the kernels with CONFIG_HZ set to 100?
I wonder
Package: linux-image-cloud-amd64
Version: 4.19+105+deb10u1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Since linux-image-cloud-* packages are created for cloud environments --
read: servers which do not need desktop-level responsiveness --,
wouldn't it be beneficial to build the kernels with CONFIG_HZ set to 10
14 matches
Mail list logo
