Bug#852004: RFP for bioperl's Bio-EUtilities

On 1/24/17, 2:03 PM, "carandr...@gmail.com on behalf of Carnë Draug" wrote: >>... >> Yes, I know. I simply have forwarded the issue upstream since the RFP >> came from upstream and I considered it more sensible if they provide >> some means to exclude http access directly in their code. >> >>

Bug#852004: RFP for bioperl's Bio-EUtilities

med/libbio-eutilities-perl.git] Hi Christopher, On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 07:25:38PM +0000, Fields, Christopher J wrote: > Just ran tests on a non-networked laptop (both latest from Github and the 1.75 release from CPAN) and they were fine, all passed and the relevant network test

Bug#852004: RFP fpr bioperl's Bio-EUtilities

Andreas, Just ran tests on a non-networked laptop (both latest from Github and the 1.75 release from CPAN) and they were fine, all passed and the relevant network tests are skipped. Can you be more specific as to the build failure? chris On 1/23/17, 12:46 PM, "Fields, Christopher J&qu

Bug#852004: RFP fpr bioperl's Bio-EUtilities

what the problem is. chris On 1/23/17, 9:12 AM, "Fields, Christopher J" wrote: My suggestion is to take the avenue of easiest solution first, then most stable solution long-term if needed. The easiest may be to move the network tests to ‘xt’, which as Carnė mentioned wo

Bug#852004: RFP fpr bioperl's Bio-EUtilities

My suggestion is to take the avenue of easiest solution first, then most stable solution long-term if needed. The easiest may be to move the network tests to ‘xt’, which as Carnė mentioned would be run upon release only. This should be easy enough w/ a Dist::Zilla release. Longer term a moc

Bug#848236: Remaining issue with gbrowse - any help (Was: Urgent call to BioPerl users (Was: Bug#848236: src:gbrowse: ...)

That’s great news Lincoln, fantastic! chris From: Lincoln Stein mailto:lincoln.st...@gmail.com>> Date: Sunday, January 15, 2017 at 3:25 PM To: Andreas Tille mailto:andr...@fam-tille.de>> Cc: Scott Cain mailto:sc...@scottcain.net>>, "848...@bugs.debian.org" <848...