On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 02:22:24PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reassign -2 kodi
> Control: retitle -2 please ship firewalld service files
> Control: block -1 by -2
>
> Am 24.07.22 um 08:12 schrieb Christian Mar
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 12:31:11PM -0800, Sunil Mohan Adapa wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:29:40 -0500 Eric Garver wrote:
> [...]
> > That makes it smell like an iptables-restore issue in the nftables
> > backed version of iptables. It would be great if we could reproduce
>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:50:56PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> Eric Garver [2018-11-26 10:20 -0500]:
> > No. As far as I can tell, firewalld never uses iptables -R (rule
> > replace) option. It's possible this is being triggered by something
> > ext
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 03:49:36PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I recently switched firewalld back to iptables given the feedback in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909574
>
> This seems to have caused a regression.
> Does this specific problem ring a bell?
No.
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 05:00:21PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 10.11.18 um 15:47 schrieb Ralf Jung:
> > According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638342, Fedora
> > changed
> > the default for FirewallBackend back until libvirt works with
> > FirewallBackend=nftables.
5 matches
Mail list logo