Package: cmucl
Version: 20c-2
Severity: normal
In previous versions of cmucl, I used to be able to have text files run as
lisp shell scripts. For example, this file:
#! /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/cmucl-run
(format t "Hello!~%")
After the upgrade to 20c, attempting to run the script gives an
Package: mirrordir
Version: 0.10.49-intl-4
Severity: normal
On some remote FTP system, my username is something like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but I'm unable to get mirrordir to log in using that username.
I've tried
mirrordir localdir ftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ftp.host.org/
which fails to
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-2
Severity: normal
I had a working apache2 configuration, with many virtual hosts.
After this recent upgrade, parts of my web sites stopped working.
I eventually discovered that the upgrade had added a new
000-default
virtual host to
/etc/ap
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-2
Severity: normal
OK, I'm well aware that Apache does not claim to allow NameVirtualHosts
together with SSL, as explained for example here:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts
Notwithstanding that disclaimer, it turns out that
l should no longer have this conflict with the debian kernel.
In addition, since the change affects all platforms, there doesn't need to be
any fear that the debian package is "different" from a "normal" cmucl.
-- Don
_________
quot;requires
linux-image-2.4, or linux-image-2.6 with version <= 2.6.15"?
-- Don
___
Don Geddis http://don.geddis.org/ [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
I don't use drugs; my dreams are frightening enough. -- M. C. Escher
Is there no resolution? Is nobody taking ownership of this conflict?
I'm running Debian as a "testing" installation with the simple packages
linux-image-2.6-686-smp
cmucl
So for cmucl I get version 19c-release-20051115-2. But the linux image for
2.6 recently upgraded in testing t
Package: xlbiff
Version: 4.1-1.1
Severity: important
(I'm running "testing" Debian.) A whole bunch of stuff just recently changed
with xserver-xorg in testing. After that update, xlbiff was removed from
my system, and appears to be no longer installable.
Sample run:
Package: netpbm
Version: 2:10.0-10
Severity: normal
When running "pnmnorm -keephues" on some very dark images, a scattering of
the dark pixels turn bright white. I believe this to be an error, probably
as a result of some over/underflow in the mathematics.
I've attached three sample images below
s for me too.
> run fetchnews -f and see if that helps
Yup, that looks like it fixed my problem. Thanks for helping me debug it.
-- Don
___________
Don Geddis http://don.geddis.org/
ode what groups I
want to download. But that script is obviously rejecting my group before
ever contacting one of the upstream servers, so it clearly can't have any
idea whether that group exists on the upstream server or not.
-- Don
__
Package: leafnode
Version: 1.11.3.rel-2
Severity: normal
I have access to two newsservers
news.server1.com
news.server2.com
The first allows downloading of group descriptions, but the second does
not. So I have a
NODESC = 1
line on the second server. However, there is one
he same as the one in #304972).
-- Don
_______
Don Geddis http://don.geddis.org/ [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
yoda/geddis:~/asdf-test> lisp
CMU Common Lisp CVS release-19a 19a-release-20040728 + minimal de
Package: cl-asdf
Version: 1.86-2
Severity: normal
One of the many files in my code contains my asdf:system definition.
If I load this file more than once (say, if I want to change the
definition) into CMUCL, then the lisp process crashes with a stack overflow.
(It's possible that I'm using ASDF i
Package: cl-asdf
Version: 1.86-2
Severity: normal
I've got a system definition something like this:
(asdf:defsystem "test"
:serial t
:components
((:module "one" :components ((:file "a") (:file "b")))
(:module "two" :components ((:file "c"))) ))
I have a hard time telling from
Package: leafnode
Version: 1.10.8.rel-2
Severity: minor
If you run leafnode (or, in particular, /usr/sbin/fetchnews) with only a
single article waiting to be posted, the debugging output says:
news.server.com: 1 articles posted.
This is about as unimportant as bugs get, but in the case of
Package: leafnode
Version: 1.10.8.rel-2
Severity: wishlist
Leafnode works poorly when given a mix of small text groups and huge
binary groups. Imagine a group list like this:
comp.latest-language
alt.binaries.huge
where the first gets 10 postings/day, but the second gets 10,000 po
17 matches
Mail list logo
