On 26.03.2025 00:26, Dom Rodriguez wrote:
I'll close this for now, as those other bug reports seem to -
partially, one way or another - cover the -only/-or-later bits we need.
Actually, looking at the Debbugs system, which I'm not /too/ familiar
with - is there a way to close th
On 13.03.2025 15:29, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Dom Rodriguez (2025-03-13 14:48:21)
On 13.03.2025 11:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>Quoting Dom Rodriguez (2025-03-13 01:18:03)
>> It would be useful for `licensecheck` to output SPDX-compliant license
>> identifiers, so that it
Hi Jonas,
On 13.03.2025 11:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Dom,
Quoting Dom Rodriguez (2025-03-13 01:18:03)
It would be useful for `licensecheck` to output SPDX-compliant license
identifiers, so that it can be used in SPDX/CycloneDX SBOMs.
Do you mean like this?:
```
licensecheck
output mode could be
done in a Unix-style pipe from the [default] tabular output in a
pipeline processing mode?
Happy to do some experimenting with the above approach, but also keen
for other suggestions.
Best regards,
--
Dom Rodriguez (he/him)
Software Engineer
Codethink Ltd
Codethink delivers
4 matches
Mail list logo
