Bug#530014: bacula-fd: /etc/init.d/bacula-fd doesn't use /etc/default/bacula-fd to enable/disable

John Goerzen wrote: Christopher Phillips (Blake) wrote: I sent in the same patches for bacula-sd and bacula-director. Since, those are daemons that should not be running on all hosts, they make more sense to enable/disable, especially if you're using a generated image across many

Bug#530019: bacula-director-common: using /etc/default/bacula-director in /etc/init.d/bacula-director

Package: bacula-director-common Severity: Normal Version: 2.4.4-1 Tags: patch Change to /etc/init.d/bacula-director to use /etc/default/bacula-director to enable/disable the daemon. --- bacula-director 2009-05-22 14:33:38.0 -0700 +++ /etc/init.d/bacula-director 2009-03-18 17:27:01.

Bug#530014: bacula-fd: /etc/init.d/bacula-fd doesn't use /etc/default/bacula-fd to enable/disable

x27;t have the /etc/default/bacula-fd file in place, the init script still works. Chris. John Goerzen wrote: What is the point of installing bacula-fd and then not running it? That just doesn't make sense to me. Christopher Phillips (Blake) wrote: Package: bacula-fd Severity: Normal

Bug#530018: bacula-sd: using /etc/default/bacula-sd in /etc/init.d/bacula-sd

Package: bacula-sd Severity: Normal Version: 2.4.4-1 Tags: patch Change to /etc/init.d/bacula-sd to use /etc/default/bacula-sd to enable/disable the daemon. --- bacula-sd 2009-05-22 14:23:33.0 -0700 +++ /etc/init.d/bacula-sd 2009-03-31 04:48:13.0 -0700 @@ -38,6 +38,12 @

Bug#530014: bacula-fd: /etc/init.d/bacula-fd doesn't use /etc/default/bacula-fd to enable/disable

Package: bacula-fd Severity: Normal Version: 2.4.4-1 Tags: patch I believe that bacula-fd should be enabled or disabled using the /etc/default/bacula-fd file. I'm submitting a patch to /etc/init.d/bacula-fd to include this. --- bacula-fd2009-05-22 13:31:25.0 -0700 +++ /etc/init.d/