On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 08:52:28AM +0300, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
> | On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 09:38:18PM +0300, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
> |
> | > However nologin is a system utility it would be better kept
> | > directly under root directory, if /sbin is not ideal, then
> | > it should g
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 09:38:18PM +0300, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
> However nologin is a system utility it would be better kept
> directly under root directory, if /sbin is not ideal, then
> it should go to /bin -- to same place as "login".
That's up to you; we don't consider it a system uti
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 07:09:37AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I've CC'd packages where I've been advogating nologin in Debian. The
> > binary is not yet widely used, so just move it so that we can get full
> > potential of nologin to forthcoming etch.
>
> Agreed.
>
> >
> > | I think th
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 08:40:49PM -0700, Neale Pickett wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 06:43 pm, Joey Hess wrote:
> > - "A lone, forgotten comma, sits here, sobbing.",
> > + "A lone, forgotten comma sits here, sobbing.",
> >
> > Surely, the extra comma, in the first line, is part of the fun,
4 matches
Mail list logo
