[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew M. Bishop) wrote:
> Thanks for the patch, but I don't like it.
[laugh] I'm not surprised; my C skills are extremely rusty through long
neglect. My apologies for applying my dull axe to your code. :)
> Can I propose a different patch that only causes the file to be
> re-
Since I didn't get copied on this reply (I just saw it after searching
the BTS), I didn't get a chance to follow up to it earlier. I'd
appreciate being CCd in the future, thanks.
Cesare Leonardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:
> > The frequ
Package: ucf
Version: 2.0012
Severity: normal
Running 'mandb -t'/'lexgrog' shows the 'ucfq' manpage to be mis-formatted:
``
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/man/man1# mandb -t
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/ucfq.1.gz: whatis parse for ucfq(1) failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/man/man1# lexgro
Package: procmeter3
Version: 3.4e-1
Followup-For: Bug #367443
Following up on the previous report with this subject:
It appears that Mutt does not change the mtime of the mailbox when deleting
email; therefore, the 'Update' function in the 'biff' module, which checks
for a changed mtime, never t
Package: w3m
Version: 0.5.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #372171
w3m segfaults (about 70% of the time, based on my informal testing) when
searching either forward (/) or in reverse (?). Like the previous reporter,
I'm marking this one grave for the same reasons: it's my primary means of
navigation within
Package: procmeter3
Version: 3.4e-1
Severity: normal
The inbox count displayed in procmeter3 does not decrease when the
emails are deleted from the inbox, although it does increase when new
email arrives. Relevant ~/.procmeterrc configuration:
Package: linux-image
Version: /linux-2.6.16.1
Severity: normal
Normally, I would not report this kind of problem using the BTS - audio
problems are common enough, and not what I consider critical problems -
but this one has persisted through a long series of kernel changes, all
the way from the e
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:10:54AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> reassign 359624 linux-2.6
> thanks
>
> * Benjamin A. Okopnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 21:51]:
> > Package: linux-image
> > Version: 2.6.13.3
> > Severity: important
>
> Can you
Package: linux-image
Version: 2.6.13.3
Severity: important
After trying to write a CD with 'cdrecord', I have the following in my
'dmesg' output:
ide-scsi: unsup command: dev hdc: flags = REQ_CMD REQ_STARTED
sector 64, nr/cnr
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:22:13PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Le Friday 10 February 2006 à 16:49:13, Benjamin A. Okopnik a écrit:
> > On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 05:53:18PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> > >
> > > I can't find your bug report in the pilot-l
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 05:53:18PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>
> I can't find your bug report in the pilot-link upstream bug system.
> I guess/hope you opened a bug there. Could you give me the bug number if
> you have it so I can add it here?
Debian already lists a very similar bug against
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 06:35:06PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Le Tuesday 01 November 2005 à 19:57:01, Benjamin A. Okopnik a écrit:
> > Fetching 'NetFrontLib' (Creator ID 'AcBC')... Failed, unable to back up
> > database NetFrontLib
> >
Hi -
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:33:27PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Le Tuesday 01 November 2005 à 13:48:06, Benjamin A. Okopnik a écrit:
> > > Maybe I should also provide in experimental a version of jpilot compiled
> > > with pilot-link 0.12.0-pre4?
> >
> >
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:22:43PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>
> pilot-link 0.11 does not support files bigger than 32 KB. pilot-link
> 0.12.0-pre4 does but is still beta.
``
r!ls -l ~/tmp/Palm_problem_children
total 1568
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ben ben 509 2005-11-01 13:38 Blazer Bookmarks.pdb
-r
Package: jpilot
Version: 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2
Severity: important
When I try to synchronize my Tungsten E2, JPilot locks up "reliably" as
soon as it hits one of the "Blazer" files. I assume that this has
something to do with the format of the PDBs - the same errors occurs
with "pilot-xfer"; howe
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:19:11PM +0200, Mike Dornberger wrote:
> Hi,
Hi -
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:08:46PM -0400, Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# hwclock --set --date="04-21-2005 13:58:00"
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# hwclock
> > Sat Feb 2
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
Severity: normal
This is actually a long-standing bug (several years, at least) that I'm
just now reporting... I guess I'm getting more picky as time goes on. :)
When I hold down the Ctrl key and click (either right- or left-) on the
xterm, I'm suppose
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.12p-4
Severity: normal
File: /sbin/hwclock
Copy'n'pasted from a console:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# hwclock
Thu Apr 21 13:57:19 2005 -0.594461 seconds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# hwclock --set --date="04-21-2005 13:58:
Package: hotplug
Version: 0.0.20040329-21
Severity: minor
Does not create a problem, simply a nasty message during boot. :) The
error, from what I can see, is in hotplug.inst:
---
db_get hotplug/static_module_list
STATIC_MODULE_LIST=$(echo
19 matches
Mail list logo
