On 23/08/12 09:18 AM, Simon Tatham wrote:
I fixed this upstream as soon as I heard of it, in early July
(r9573). I seem to have forgotten to CC the Debian bug report when I
notified Colin that I'd committed the fix; I apologise if that
caused a delay.
If you're happy to rebuild and test modified
On 23/08/12 08:17 AM, BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
Any chance to look at this yet? I've had to put my putty on hold, as
the release in wheezy breaks for an important use case for my work.
I would be happy to assist in any way I can.
I can now report that using a local rebuild of the d
On 05/07/12 07:52 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
Hi PuTTY team,
This sounds like an interesting thing for somebody to check out :-)
The exact patches I've applied can be found here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/loggerhead/pkg-ssh/putty/trunk/changes
https://patches.ubuntu.com/by-release/atomic/deb
Shouldn't this be filed against ruby1.8? The ruby package only depends
on ruby1.8, and it is ruby1.8 that is fragmented. Furthermore, ruby and
ruby1.8 have different maintainers.
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
4 matches
Mail list logo
