On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Hi, I did a little digging. Package gcj-3.4 was removed
from Debian Unstable on Aug 14, 2005 because it was
"Not Built by Source"
http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt
Since gcj is the critical path, this suggests to me that
maybe gcj-4.x i
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Matthew O'Connor wrote:
I compiled PyLucene 1.9rc1-7 for the i386, amd64, and
powerpc Debian architectures. I created an APT repository
because I figured it would be easier to manage. So if you
add the follow instructions to your website they should make
sense to any Debia
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Andi, how about distributing the binary package (.deb) from the
PyLucene website while things are shaking out? Or perhaps Matthew
can distribute from canonical.org, and have a link from the PyLucene
homepage? This can be done immediately, allows Debia
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
The gcj situation is more serious. No way in hell can we package the gcj
runtime inside the PyLucene package. As far as I can tell this is a
showstopper,although I'm curious what the gcj package maintainers have to
say about the matter.
Ah, if only
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
I use Apple's JDK on Mac OS X, my main development platform.
Oh yeah. There is one more technical factor to add into the mix, hopefully
people's heads aren't ready to explode.
Debian supports a lot of architecture, I think the current number is 11.
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Matthew O'Connor wrote:
I'll play around with trying to get this to work. Andi,
when you normally compile the Lucene code which JDK do you
use and on which platform (sorry if you answered this
elsewhere)? Before I begin I want to verify I can at least
reproduce what Andi i
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Once there is a Debian Java Lucene 1.9 source package available, the PyLucene
1.9 package could be made to depend on it, unpack it, apply the patches, build
it (and not install it) and then build itself. Seems pretty straightforward to
me.
Sorry, th
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Matthew O'Connor wrote:
Personally, I'm fine with it going into contrib. I'd like
it to go into main but that's probably not feasible unless
there's a DFSG-free JDK that could compile it.
If Java Lucene exists as a Debian package already, then this problem must have
been
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Another possibility - maybe - is to package an older version of PyLucene
that depends on Java Lucene 1.4.3. However, I suspect there are likely
to be similar issues and an upatched Java Lucene 1.4.3 will not be a viable
build dependency either.
The
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Good work on the package. However, I don't like that it starts with
Java bytecode
instead of canonical source code. Do you think it would be possible to have the
PyLucene package use the Java Lucene package as a build dependency?
With L
10 matches
Mail list logo
