Package: sssd
Version: 1.2.1-4.2
Severity: important
I just noticed that the 'reportbug' tool automatically assumed that the
bug was reported against the installed version. However, seeing as I had
already downgraded by the time I reported the bug, this is incorrect.
The bug actually occurs for v
Package: sssd
Version: 1.2.1-4+squeeze1
Severity: important
I performed the upgrade: sssd 1.2.1-4+squeeze1 -> 1.2.1-4.2
sssd failed to start.
Attempted:
# /etc/init.d/sssd restart
This gave no output.
I then tried starting sssd interactively:
# sssd -d -f
This produced the following lines in
l 2.6.12 if you install testing...or 2.6.15 if you
> install unstable.
>
Just tried the same thing with a daily-build image:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
... same problems, same symptoms.
Regards,
Al
> -Original Message-
> From: Lennart Sorensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 4:37 PM
> To: Alexander Wintermans; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug#345999: installation-report: Same problem on
> a Dell Latitude D610
>
> On Th
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.9
Followup-For: Bug #345999
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/beta1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 26-Jan-2006
Machine: Dell Latitude D610
Partitions: Not
5 matches
Mail list logo
