On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 23:02:32 +0200 Torsten Landschoff <
tors...@landschoff.net> wrote:
> On 5/3/19 10:37 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Would be super nice to have swig 4 in Debian.
>
> absolutely. And I did not notice for months. I'll have a go - maybe
this
> weekend, but no guarantees!
How did
On 26 September 2017 at 20:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Source: blcr
> Version: 0.8.5-2.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: buster sid
>
> As far as I can see:
> 1. blcr is dead upstream since 2013.
> 2. blcr requires both userspace and kernel parts.
> 3. The -dkms package is removed in unstable.
> 4. The
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:30:57 +0100 Mattia Rizzolo
wrote:
>
>
> package: ftp.debian.org
> X-Debbugs-Cc: libvi...@packages.debian.org
>
> Please remove libvisca from the archive.
>
> It has a very low popcon (3), and the hardware it's design to talk to
is
>
>
> not produced anymore (or anywa
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:30:57 +0100 Mattia Rizzolo
wrote:
>
>
> package: ftp.debian.org
> X-Debbugs-Cc: libvi...@packages.debian.org
>
> Please remove libvisca from the archive.
>
> It has a very low popcon (3), and the hardware it's design to talk to
is
>
>
> not produced anymore (or anywa
On 5 March 2013 20:56, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alan Woodland wrote (02 Feb 2013 13:23:22 GMT) :
>> 0.8.5-1 is the official upstream release that adds support for more recent
>> kernels
>> and fixes a number of other bugs which were discovered. This version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package blcr
0.8.5-1 is the official upstream release that adds support for more recent
kernels and fixes a number of other bugs which were discovered. This version
fixes #
On 18 December 2012 11:33, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>
> With all due respect to Alan, removing the blcr-dkms package from the build
> is *not* a fix for the reported problem
> "blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later".
I agree that this is less than ideal and will upload a new version a
On 7 November 2012 11:15, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:56:32 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote:
>
>> There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on
>> the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms packag
On 7 November 2012 11:15, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:56:32 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote:
>
>> There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on
>> the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms packag
On 14 October 2012 17:07, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 16:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>>
>> On 14.10.2012 16:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug
>> > #638339). It will probably be fixed u
tags 638339 help
forcemerge 638339 668348
thanks
On 11 April 2012 09:42, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Package: blcr-dkms
> Version: 0.8.4-2
> Severity: important
>
> checking the name lister (/usr/bin/nm -B) interface... (cached) BSD nm
> configure: error: --with-linux argument '3.2.0-2-amd64' is nei
On 14 January 2012 11:52, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Package: blcr-dkms
> Version: 0.8.4-1
> Followup-For: Bug #638339
>
> DKMS make.log for blcr-0.8.4 for kernel 3.1.0-1-amd64 (x86_64)
> Sat Jan 14 12:43:27 CET 2012
> make: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-amd64'
> /var/lib/dkms/b
tags 645549 +confirmed
On 16 October 2011 22:32, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> Package: blcr
> Version: 0.8.4-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Forgot to actually add armhf to the arch list. The new package builds
> fine on armhf.
Whoops! I'll add it to the next upload.
Not quite sur
On 12 October 2011 18:18, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
> Alan,
I've had a quick go at putting together a patch for 3.0.0 this evening.
> We are aware of 2 non-trivial issues in 2.6.39
That seems to match what I've seen too, as these issues are the only
big things I've encountered so far and I have a
There's a new upstream release which adds support for more recent
kernels. I'm currently testing it with a view to making an upload
tonight.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul H. Hargrove
Date: 12 October 2011 02:03
Subject: [Checkpoint] Announcing the release of BLCR 0.8.4
To: "c
On 28 September 2011 16:19, Konstantinos Margaritis
wrote:
> On 14 April 2011 11:58, Alan Woodland wrote:
>> tags 622720 +confirmed
>> tags 622720 +pending
>> thanks
>>
>> On 14 April 2011 12:21, Konstantinos Margaritis
>> wrote:
>>> Sour
tags 638339 +confirmed
thanks
Hi,
Thanks for this report. I'm aware of this issue, but it may be a while
until a fix is forthcoming since kernel support is lagging behind even
before the 3.0 series. I hope to have this fixed in time to release with
wheezy though.
There's a new release out yester
On 12 May 2011 21:59, Tomáš Hnyk wrote:
>> Nice to hear that others consider my decision for recommends reasonable.
>> The original poster might like to reread the guidelines when to use
>> Depends and when Recommends.
>
> Do you mean this:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationship
I've hit this bug from a different scenario - I have one SATA disk and
one external USB disk in a root on RAID1+LVM setup. During boot it
seems the USB device often doesn't settle before the md device gets to
being assembled, with the net result that it boots degraded, with the
USB device missing.
tags 622720 +confirmed
tags 622720 +pending
thanks
On 14 April 2011 12:21, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> Source: blcr
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> This patch is a backport from the Ubuntu armel package. Debian armhf
> uses thumb2 just as Ubuntu armel, so it has the same build proble
On -10/01/37 20:59, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Package: blcr-dkms
> Version: 0.8.2-15
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I cannot install blcr-dkms on my system:
>
[snip]
> Building module:
> cleaning build area
> make KERNELRELEASE=2.6.37-1-amd64 -C /lib/modules/2.6.37-1-amd64/build
>
tags 597601 +patch
tags 597601 +pending
thanks
Hi,
I'm having some trouble getting x86 builds to work in an x86 chroot
hosted on a x86_64 machine. The fault seems to stem from the fact that
CR_LIBARCH is set to i686, not i386, which causes the building of the
library later on to search in libcr/a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 597601 +confirmed
thanks
On -10/01/37 20:59, Jonathan KLEE wrote:
> I'm trying to build blcr (0.8.2-13) on x86_64 from scratch with pbuilder but
> I have the following error :
>
> libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../libcr -I.. -D
For some reason CR_LIBARCH is getting set to i686 in pbuilder on amd64
and i386 on real i386 hardware. Looking into it further.
Alan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 573112 +patch
thanks
I'm testing a newer patch from upstream which adds support for newer kernels.
Alan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 20 May 2010 14:05, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
> Hello, Michael.
>
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 14:24:08 +0200
> Michael Fladischer wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I saw your response on #556135 offering help. There is a new upload
>> for Weave 1.2.3 on m
On 13 April 2010 07:26, Yves Caniou wrote:
> Le Thursday 25 March 2010 19:34:35 Alan Woodland, vous avez écrit :
>> retitle 573112 Please support 2.6.33 kernels
>> tags 573112 +confirmed
>> thanks
>>
>> I've taken a closer look at this problem and can con
On 29 March 2010 15:04, Michael Fladischer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've uploaded my package to mentors.debian.net:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/weave/weave_1.2b2-1.dsc
>
> It works well and I was able to seamlessly replace the user-installed
retitle 573112 Please support 2.6.33 kernels
tags 573112 +confirmed
thanks
I've taken a closer look at this problem and can confirm that it is
just a problem with 2.6.33. Quite a few files have moved around. I've
got partial patches for a few of the changes, but I just noticed the
upstream author
On 22 March 2010 19:05, Fladischer Michael
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I saw your response on ITP #556135 saying that you intend to package
> Mozilla Labs Weave and I wanted to ask you on how far your progress is.
>
> Maybe you want to take a look at my approach on packaging Weave. The
> package is currently
On 9 March 2010 13:26, Yves Caniou wrote:
> Le Tuesday 09 March 2010 14:12:50 Alan Woodland, vous avez écrit :
>> On 9 March 2010 11:29, Yves Caniou wrote:
>> > Le Tuesday 09 March 2010 12:21:49 Alan Woodland, vous avez écrit :
>> >> On 9 March 2010 02:24, Yves
On 9 March 2010 02:24, Yves Caniou wrote:
> Package: blcr-dkms
> Version: 0.8.2-9
> Severity: normal
>
> Compilation with the line provided in the package (but with full path for the
> manually installed and running kernel)
> cd /var/lib/dkms/blcr/0.8.2/build && env -i
> PATH=.:..:/sbin:/usr/sbin
On 9 March 2010 11:29, Yves Caniou wrote:
> Le Tuesday 09 March 2010 12:21:49 Alan Woodland, vous avez écrit :
>> On 9 March 2010 02:24, Yves Caniou wrote:
>> > Package: blcr-dkms
>> > Version: 0.8.2-9
>> > Severity: normal
>> >
>> > Compi
On 2 March 2010 14:59, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> 2010/3/2 Alan Woodland :
>> 2010/3/2 Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos :
>>> Package: openmpi-checkpoint
>>> Version: 1.4.1-1
>>> Severity: important
>>>
>>>
>>> openmpi-checkpoint does not
2010/3/2 Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos :
> Package: openmpi-checkpoint
> Version: 1.4.1-1
> Severity: important
>
>
> openmpi-checkpoint does not currently depend on blcr-util. However,
> ompi-restart will segfault unless blcr-util (upstream bug maybe, I reported
> to the OpenMPI users mailing lis
There seems to be patches for this issue:
http://code.google.com/p/distcc/issues/detail?id=34#c7
Are they sane/sensbile?
Is this still a problem in Sid/Squeeze? It certainly exists in Lenny
still, but if a subsequent release has been packaged this bug could
probably be closed or tagged appropriate
2010/3/1 Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos :
> Package: openmpi-checkpoint
> Version: 1.4.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> /usr/bin/ompi-checkpoint is a symlink to orte-checkpoint, but orte-checkpoint
> isn't installed by this package.
Does indeeed seem to be missin
ge.
> robot-player: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag.
> robot-player: lintian output: 'arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share
> ./usr/share/player/examples/libplayerc/speech_c_client', automatically
> rejected
> package.
> robot-player: If you have a
retitle 556135 ITP: xul-ext-weave -- Syncronize personal data between
Mozilla browsers
owner 556135 !
thanks
I'm using weave myself quite a lot now, so I'll take a look at
providing this soon.
Alan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
tags 560983 +help
tag 557310 pending
thanks
Hi,
I had a look at doing this today and it's not as trivial as I'd hoped.
If someone else wanted to take a look at this I'd very much appreciate
it.
Thanks,
Alan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
2010/1/5 Benjamin Drung :
> Am Dienstag, den 05.01.2010, 17:34 +0100 schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer:
>> Sorry for the late reply,..
>
> No problem.
>
>> On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 18:29 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>> > * The "license block" (BEGIN LICENSE BLOCK to END LICENSE BLOCK)
> needs
>> > to b
2009/12/22 Jakub Adam :
> Subject: xul-ext-traybiff: mail LED notification does not work on Asus
> laptops
> Package: xul-ext-traybiff
> Version: 1.2.3-7
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> This plugin is able to autodetect LEDs present on some laptops and use them
> for notifications on new mail
tags 561365 +confirmed
thanks
2009/12/16 Yuri D'Elia :
> Package: blcr-dkms
> Version: 0.8.2-6
> Severity: normal
>
> In the current package version, libtool is executed during the build phase of
> the module. libtool is not listed as a dependency, and thus the build fails.
>
> libtool should not
tags 560983 +confirmed
thanks
2009/12/13 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> Package: gmail-notify
> Severity: normal
> User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: oldlibs eggtrayicon
>
> Hi,
>
> gmail-notify uses egg.trayicon, but it should use gtk.StatusIcon which is
> better and well
lenny-xss-fix.debdiff
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
diff -uNr sage.orig/content/createhtml.js sage/content/createhtml.js
--- sage.orig/content/createhtml.js 2009-12-10 14:01:59.0 +
+++ sage/content/createhtml.js 2009-12-10 14:41:04.0 +
@@ -136,7 +136,8 @@
return this.entityEncode(feed.getTitle());
case "**LINK**":
diff -uNr sage.orig/content/createhtml.js sage/content/createhtml.js
--- sage.orig/content/createhtml.js 2009-12-10 14:01:59.0 +
+++ sage/content/createhtml.js 2009-12-10 14:41:04.0 +
@@ -136,7 +136,8 @@
return this.entityEncode(feed.getTitle());
case "**LINK**":
Hi,
For my sins I'm the maintainer of the Debian package of Sage. I'm
looking at fixing the security bug that was recently reported [1].
Both of your names were mentioned in [2] as reporting the bug.
I'm looking to either prepare my own patch, in which a test case and
some advice would be extreme
2009/12/3 Alan Woodland :
> 2009/12/3 Giuseppe Iuculano :
>> Package: firefox-sage
>> Severity: grave
>> Tags: security
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities &a
2009/12/3 Giuseppe Iuculano :
> Package: firefox-sage
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi,
> the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> published for firefox-sage.
>
> CVE-2009-4102[0]:
> | Sage 1.4.3 and earlier exten
retitle 555700 ITP: songbird -- desktop Web player, a digital jukebox
and Web browser
forcemerge 412437 507218 555700
thanks
Hi,
Thanks for this RFP. There are currently two existing ITP bugs for
Songbird. Currently packaging Songbird is blocked by the large(ish)
number of custom patches [0] for
Hi,
I've just sponsored an NMU for player to DELAYED/7, which makes only
one change, a fix for the RC bug #524746. If you'd like me to cancel
this to give you more time drop me an email.
Thanks,
Alan
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Alan Woodland
Date: 2009/11/12
S
Ok, that makes sense to wait for 1.3.x then I guess. I also forgot in
my patch to point out that BLCR only exists in Debian for i386, amd64,
armel and powerpc.
The patch I submitted for OpenMPI which enabled BLCR support did
indeed add an extra binary package, openmpi-checkpoint which avoids
linki
2009/11/10 Alan Woodland :
> 2009/11/10 Jakub Wilk :
>> tags 547351 + patch
>> thanks
>>
>> I've finally managed to write a patch:
>> http://hg.debian.org/hg/collab-maint/l7-filter-userspace/raw-file/tip/debian/patches/netfilter-conntrack-0.100.diff
&g
d.
+ * Add BLCR checkpoint library support
+
+ -- Alan Woodland Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:22:37 +
+
mpich2 (1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Upload to unstable. (Actually, 1.2-1 was already uploaded to unstable)
2009/11/10 Jakub Wilk :
> tags 547351 + patch
> thanks
>
> I've finally managed to write a patch:
> http://hg.debian.org/hg/collab-maint/l7-filter-userspace/raw-file/tip/debian/patches/netfilter-conntrack-0.100.diff
>
> Testing will be *much* appreciated.
>
Excellent, I'll have a fiddle with it tom
2009/11/9 Aaron M. Ucko :
> Package: lib32cr0
> Version: 0.8.2-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 9.1.1
>
> lib32cr0 installs into /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib. Although that was
> once the correct location for 32-bit libraries on amd64 Debian systems
> (with /usr/lib32 a mere symlink there
g, den 13.09.2009, 10:59 +0100 schrieb Alan Woodland:
>> The attached patch builds an extra binary package, openmpi-checkpoint
>> on architectures which have BLCR available. (Option #3 from the
>> earlier mail). I think it all works sanely, and shouldn't introduce
>> any new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
fixed 549740 1.2.3-6
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: mozilla-traybiff
> Version: 1.2.3-5
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild o
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
mozilla-traybiff-common used to share files between icedove-traybiff and
iceape-traybiff. Iceape was dropped late on in the Lenny release cycle, and the
minimal change for mozilla-traybiff kept the -common package rather than
merging it.
Since iceape i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alan Woodland
* Package name: libvisca
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Damien Douxchamps
* URL : http://damien.douxchamps.net/libvisca/
* License : LGPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : Implementation of
Package: hurd
Version: 20090404-1
Severity: important
/dev/MAKEDEV seems to assume the default shell is bash, which is no longer true
in sid.
nostradamus-hurd:~# cd /dev
nostradamus-hurd:/dev# ./MAKEDEV hd2
./MAKEDEV: 53: function: not found
eval: 1: hd2: not found
./MAKEDEV: 56: Syntax error: "
2009/9/25 Sandro Tosi :
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:05, Alan Woodland wrote:
>> retitle 548239 ITA: gmail-notify -- A Gmail Notifier
>> owner 548239 !
>> thanks
>>
>> I'll adopt gmail-notify, hopefully making an upload over the weekend.
>
> you
retitle 548239 ITA: gmail-notify -- A Gmail Notifier
owner 548239 !
thanks
I'll adopt gmail-notify, hopefully making an upload over the weekend.
Alan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
Hi,
I was the original sponsor for gmail-notify. I've been aware of the
absent maintainer for sometime now, although I know no more than you
do about the reasons. I prepared an NMU almost exactly 10 days ago
that addresses most of the outstanding bugs for this package, and
emailed the maintainer a
2009/9/19 Jakub Wilk :
> * Alan Woodland , 2009-09-18, 21:51:
>>
>> Justification: Policy 5.8.2
>
> My copy of Debian Policy does not have such a section:
>
> $ zgrep -cF 5.8.2 /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.txt.gz
> 0
>
Whoops, not sure where that came
Subject: l7-filter-userspace: [FTBFS] 'nfct_sprintf_protocol' was not declared
Package: l7-filter-userspace
Version: 0.11-1
Justification: Policy 5.8.2
Severity: serious
The buildd logs from the original build (e.g.
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=l7-filter-userspace&ver=0.11-1&arch=amd6
2009/9/18 Jakub Wilk :
> * Alan Woodland , 2009-09-17, 19:44:
>>>
>>> 2) Patch l7-filter-userspace to look into /usr/share/l7-protocols for
>>> protocol definitions rather than /etc/l7-protocols. Then l7-protocols
>>> could
>>> provide no /etc/l7-
2009/9/17 Piotr Lewandowski :
> Hi Alan,
>
> I need your advice what to do with my first RC-bug. :)
I would normally recommend CC'ing discussions relating to how to fix
the bug to the bug report itself - someone else might read the bug and
have something relevant to offer to the discussion, or alt
2009/7/16 Tim Gokcen :
> Package: icedove-traybiff
> Version: 1.2.3-4.3
> Severity: important
>
> After upgrading to KDE 4 in the 'testing' distribution, the tray icon for
> Icedove no longer functions. Instead of showing a 'letter' icon, the tray
> has a blank space where the icon should be. Somet
rence window patch from Ubuntu (Closes: #432676)
+ * Replace & with & in popups (Closes: #420871)
+ * Add debian/watch
+
+ -- Alan Woodland Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:31:01 +0100
+
gmail-notify (1.6.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Chance default x-www-browser to www-browser (closes: #38953
g
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
+openmpi (1.3.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Build with BLCR support on i386,amd64,ppc,armel
+ * Adds openmpi-checkpoint package, which includes the binaries for checkpointing
+
+ -- Alan Woodland Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:41:22 +0100
+
diff -u openmpi-1.3.3/debian/rules openmpi-1.3
2009/9/12 Alan Woodland :
> I'll try and convert the I've got into a repeatable, automated test
> and then add it to this bug report in a bit too.
As promised I've attached a somewhat crude test for the BLCR
checkpointing to this email. run_test.sh compiles and runs ever
2009/9/12 Alan Woodland :
> 2009/9/10 Alan Woodland :
>> 2009/9/10 Manuel Prinz :
>>> Hi Alan!
>>>
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 00:33 +0100 schrieb Alan Woodland:
>>>> BLCR is now in main. It would be nice if openmpi were built using this
>&
2009/9/10 Alan Woodland :
> 2009/9/10 Manuel Prinz :
>> Hi Alan!
>>
>> Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 00:33 +0100 schrieb Alan Woodland:
>>> BLCR is now in main. It would be nice if openmpi were built using this
>>> where it is available.
>>>
&
2009/9/10 Manuel Prinz :
> Hi Alan!
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 00:33 +0100 schrieb Alan Woodland:
>> BLCR is now in main. It would be nice if openmpi were built using this
>> where it is available.
>>
>> I've attached a short patch adding options to c
log
--- openmpi-1.3.3/debian/changelog
+++ openmpi-1.3.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+openmpi (1.3.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Build with BLCR support on i386,amd64,ppc,armel
+
+ -- Alan Woodland Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:41:22 +0100
+
openmpi (1.3.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstre
http://www.nersc.gov/hypermail/checkpoint/1250.html
http://www.nersc.gov/hypermail/checkpoint/1245.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
2009/8/25 Martin Zobel-Helas :
> reopen 543263
> retitle 543263 "Fails with Assembler messages"
> version 543263 0.8.2-3
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> now it fails with
>
> | libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../libcr -I.. -D_GNU_SOURCE
> -D_REENTRANT -I../include -I../../include -I../../libc
2009/8/22 Paul H. Hargrove :
> Alan Woodland wrote:
>>
>> 2009/8/22 Paul H. Hargrove :
>>
>>>
>>> Removing the check for _end will negate the validation that is being
>>> performed.
>>> Instead, I would suggest that an alternative symbol
tags 543263 confirmed
thanks
2009/8/23 Martin Zobel-Helas :
> Package: blcr
> Version: 0.8.2-2
> Severity: serious
>
>> checking for value of CR_ASM_OP_HAND_CHKPT... 2147787009
>> checking for value of CR_ASM_CHECKPOINT_STUB... 16384
>> checking for value of CR_ASM_OP_HAND_ABORT... 2147787010
>> c
2009/8/22 Paul H. Hargrove :
> Removing the check for _end will negate the validation that is being
> performed.
> Instead, I would suggest that an alternative symbol should be used for
> validation.
>
> Does the build work after replacing ' [AB] _end' with ' [TD] sys_open' in
> the line quoted fro
On 16 Aug 2009, at 21:16, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
[snip]
I'll keep that info around for anyone else who asks about other
architectures.
Regarding the question of *BSD or Hurd (ignoring that "L" in BLCR
stands for Linux):
While I don't want to totally rule-out the possibility, I doubt
tha
(For readers on checkpo...@lbl.gov blcr was accepted into Debian last
night)
It seems that your package currently doesn't work on all arches.
It fails with errors like:
checking build system type... alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type... alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu
configure:
tags 537275 +help
thanks
Hi,
This is a general call for help really - I don't have KDE 4 available
to test things with, and I'm not too familiar with egg tray icons...
patches would be much appreciated.
Alan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: file
Version: 5.03-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I'm currently packaging BLCR (ITP: #529619), and the source for it includes
blcr.magic, which would be useful to see in the main libmagic
packages.
Thanks,
Alan
# This is file type detection data for the file(1), as described in the
2009/7/23 Guy Coates :
> I'm not a DD, but I do have some experience with packaging (including the joy
> of
> module-assistant), so I'd be happy to review the packages.
>
Wow, quite a lot of interest in a short space of time!
First rough cut packages are online @ http://users.aber.ac.uk/ajw/debi
Forgot to CC the ITP bug...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alan Woodland
Date: 2009/7/23
Subject: BLCR Debian Packages
To: "checkpo...@lbl.gov"
Cc: Alan Woodland
Hi,
A Debian user has requested packages of BLCR.
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=529
package wnpp
owner 529619 Alan Woodland
retitle 529619 ITP: blcr -- Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart
thanks
I've been using this quite a lot lately on several clusters as well as
my desktops. Would be very handy to see this in Debian, and I can
probably do some packaging as part of my da
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> First of all, this bug is ages old, it's been around at least from 4.3.
> onwards.
>
> Second, it is amd64-only; I can reproduce it with 100% certainty on all
> amd64-machines, but nowhere else (including, btw, one 64-bit alpha).
>
> Third, dx works fine nevertheless: exe
2009/1/18 Ryan Niebur :
> Hi,
>
> (sorry for the late response)
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:14:18AM +, Alan Woodland wrote:
>> Savvas Radevic wrote:
>>> Also this personal package archive (Fabien Tassin):
>>> http://ppa.launchpad.net/fta/ubuntu/pool/ma
Savvas Radevic wrote:
I don't know if this helps, but the getdeb.net team has already
packaged version 1.0.0
Here's the deb source along with some ubuntu 8.10 intrepid ibex deb packages:
http://archive.getdeb.net/getdeb/ubuntu/intrepid/so/
The getdeb packages are basically just a wrapper aroun
2009/1/2 Alan Woodland :
> 2008/12/31 Ryan Niebur :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Alan, since you've already worked on this a bit, do you want to start
>> the team and the repository with what you already have done? Then any
>> of us can work on integrating in some of the
2008/12/31 Ryan Niebur :
> Hi,
>
> Alan, since you've already worked on this a bit, do you want to start
> the team and the repository with what you already have done? Then any
> of us can work on integrating in some of the work that Ubuntu did.
Sounds like a plan. I'm away for a couple more days,
2008/12/1 Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like there isn't much happening with packaging songbird. I'm
> interested in helping with songbird, too. Would you like to start an
> alioth team to work on it? I'd be happy to help. If you're gonna start
> a team, I really don't care ab
Mark Purcell wrote:
> Package: dx
> Followup-For: Bug #503631
>
> tags 503631 unreproducible
> severity 503631 important
> subscribe 503631 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
>
> David, Daniel,
>
> I am unable to reproduce this RC bug on lenny. I obtain
> an empty window titled "Untitled" which allows m
Riku Voipio wrote:
Package: mozilla-traybiff
Version: 1.2.3-4.1
Severity: serious
armel buildlog:
g++ -L/usr/lib/iceape -lxpcom -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl
-lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0
-lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ld
tags 486170 +upstream
tags 486170 +confirmed
thanks
Hi,
Thanks for the bug report. I'm currently waiting for upstream to make a
new release fixing this:
http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/sage/2008-May/001560.html
Alan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
2008/5/17 Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:32:49AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> tag 480822 + patch
>> thanks
>>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:07:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> > Package: mozilla-traybiff
>> > Severity: wishlist
>> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Usert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 470124 +confirmed
thanks
Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: ogle
> Version: 0.9.2-5
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Attached is the diff for my ogle 0.9.2-5.1 NMU.
Thanks for doing that, sorry I didn't get round to it before you
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
