e use
it, no one wants to actively maintain it.
Recently another person wrote me he maintains a current PPA for Ubuntu - I
wasn't even aware of that.
Aaron
On Wed 11. Nov 2020 at 20:41, Aaron Zauner (azet) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 11.11.2020, at 20:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
> >
Hi,
> On 11.11.2020, at 20:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
>> On 11-11-2020 20:11, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 7:02 PM Aaron Zauner (azet) wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>>
Hey,
Thanks for working this out guys! I think arch:all is a good solution
having the Lua paths fixed upstream.
Aaron
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 1:45 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26/10/20 at 11:19 +0100, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Sep
age. But indeed, it should probably be reported (and fixed) upstream.
>
>> On 17/02/20 at 19:49 +0100, Aaron Zauner wrote:
>> Since I'm barely keeping this package updated I'd suggest that you use the
>> upstream Lmod project source with the dependencies th
stion.
> So yes, it is the same version as debian's package, we're currently using
> the packages from:
> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20200217T030244Z/
>
> (We started upgrading the system this morning, so the date of the archive
> is this morning's)
&g
It might be related to the version. Keep in mind that the version packaged
for Debian is quite old. Did you try with the same version?
On Mon 17. Feb 2020 at 19:39, Tamar Klein wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for your suggestion.
>
> When downloading the source package and building it locally, the paths
Hi Tamar
This is something you need to bring up with the upstream maintainer of
lmod. Replacing hard coded paths for one architecture with another will
just break it for most users except for you.
I suggest opening a GitHub PR with reference to this Debian bug report and
an explanation what doesn
utomatically setting lmod up for the
user.
Aaron
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Aaron Zauner wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> Thanks for working on this. I'm fine with the changes you've made. Haven't
> tested to be honest as I had limited time since you've
Sorry for the late reply.
Thanks for working on this. I'm fine with the changes you've made. Haven't
tested to be honest as I had limited time since you've worked on these
changes to do so.
Again thanks for updating,
Aaron
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
> Control:
Hi,
+1 on removal of this CA from the default system trusted CA
certificates. I get why back in the day CAcert and similar
projects looked like a valid idea, but the CA landscape has changed
significantly [0] since then and a CA that does not conform with
modern technical and operational procedure
Hi,
I was wondering what the status of this RFP is? I'd also be
interested in seeing this available as a debian package.
Thanks,
Aaron
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Hilboll wrote:
> Package: lmod
> Version: 5.8-1
>
> For some months now, a new upstream version 6.0.1 of the lmod package is
> available (see http://sourceforge.net/projects/lmod/).
>
> It would be great if this could be packaged for Debian; currently sid
> includes lmod vers
Hi,
I think we should take this discussion to an appropriate PostgreSQL
mailing list (please feel free to include me in a thread if you start
one). But I think it's best to close this bug for now. I agree that MD5
needs to be replaced, but using plaintext instead is certainly no option.
Aaron
Michael Samuel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5 March 2015 at 19:58, Christoph Berg wrote:
>>> That's an excellent thought.. I wasn't aware of this. Unfortunately,
>>> I'm not sure that we could make it the default in Debian as it requires
>>> server-side certificates be configured and used properly (co
Hi Stephen
Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> That's an excellent thought.. I wasn't aware of this. Unfortunately,
> I'm not sure that we could make it the default in Debian as it requires
> server-side certificates be configured and used properly (correct?) but
> I don't see a reason to not support it a
Hi,
Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> PG supports client-side certificate based authentication which would be
> far better than any kind of password-based authentication. If password
> based auth is insisted upon then TLS to verify the server-side and
> protect the network connection would be good and re
Hi Stephen,
* Stephen Frost [04/03/2015 01:45:56] wrote:
> Aaron,
>
> * Aaron Zauner (a...@azet.org) wrote:
> > Debian ships a set of Perl scripts to configure for PostgreSQL server
> > configurations, these are quite outdated and are currently configuring
> > aut
Package: postgresql
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
Debian ships a set of Perl scripts to configure for PostgreSQL server
configurations, these are quite outdated and are currently configuring
authentication to use MD5 when 'password' should be used instead.
http://www.openwall.com/lists/
Hi Valentin,
* Valentin Plugaru [141010 16:27]:
> Package: lmod
> Version: 5.6.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Please package the upstream 5.7.5 Lmod [1,2], as several important bugs
> have been fixed [3].
>
> [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/lmod/files/Lmod-5.7.5.tar.bz2/
4+2TxkgH
=uslS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Add Aaron Zauner as a Debian Maintainer
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 01:42:17 +0200
Action: import
Recommended-By:
Christian Hofstaedler
Agreement:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2014/04/msg9.html
Advocates:
https://lists.deb
6OZHfIIakoB3mPSDBz+4
JRmJCmZ63P79ag3Mg2k7alUT1o2YX97MfqU0btKFzeVvwduK3wxMJzHXHuNJ8fEj
jERUrdGDVRR6DefUZmMOZMip1sGyyasPUaluL2uY57rbn/UrV0nlOcYYa4a3eCuW
gHQ83r6smMOO23+LknBQ
=VHg2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Add Aaron Zauner as a Debian Maintainer
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 01:42:17 +0200
Action: import
Dat
Hi,
reportbug(1) seems to have discarded my bug description:
```
Botan may build with optional Python language support that can be
configured by the configure.py option "--with-boost-python" and
optionally "--with-python-version=$version". Although Python bindings
are currently considered Alpha
Package: libbotan1.10-dev
Version: 1.10.5-1
Severity: wishlist
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.9-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=UTF-8 (charmap=loca
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aaron Zauner
* Package name: lua-term
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Rob Hoelz
* URL : https://github.com/hoelzro/lua-term
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Lua
Description : a Lua module for manipulating a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aaron Zauner
* Package name: lmod
Version : 5.3.2
Upstream Author : Robert McLay
* URL : https://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/lmod
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Lua
Description : Lua environment modules
25 matches
Mail list logo
