Hello Otto,
On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 21:10 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> I recently uploaded MariaDB 11.4 to Debian, and it seems it regressed
> on sparc64.
>
> Are there any sparc64 hackers interested in taking a look?
>
> The build itself passed and most of the post-build passes, but some
> tes
On 3 July 2024 at 07:18, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Am Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:32:43PM + schrieb Graham Inggs:
| > > We did not implemented any hooks to realise this yet.
| >
| > Wouldn't removing the following line from debian/control do it?
| >
| > Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-r
|
| Well, sure
Package: wminput
Version: 0.6.91-7.1+b2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
When I start wminput, after I put the Wiimote in discoverable mode
wminput prints `ValueError: PyCapsule_GetPointer called with incorrect
name` and immediately exits.
I downloaded the source package and edited `python/W
Am Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:32:43PM + schrieb Graham Inggs:
> > We did not implemented any hooks to realise this yet.
>
> Wouldn't removing the following line from debian/control do it?
>
> Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-r
Well, sure. But our tooling will add this for the next upstream version
a
Hi!
I recently uploaded MariaDB 11.4 to Debian, and it seems it regressed
on sparc64.
Are there any sparc64 hackers interested in taking a look?
The build itself passed and most of the post-build passes, but some
tests cause the database to crash. Stack traces are visible in the
logs:
https://b
Hi!
This https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074670 is a
result of the MariaDB build with the embedded server using excessive
disk space.
I have filed reverting MR at
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-server/-/merge_requests/89
and asked upstream for advice in
https://l
Control: reopen 1056293
Hi,
I have done a rebuild of ssl-utils-clojure[1] and it failed to build
with default Java 21 against gettext 0.22.5-1.
Best Regards,
Vladimir.
[1]
https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16248843/+listing-archive-extra
Package: efax
Version: 1:0.9a-22
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The upgrade to 1:0.9a-22 resulted in the removal of /var/log/efax
and creation of /var/loog and /var/loog/efax.
Bill
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Archi
Hi Bastian,
Sorry for the slow reply. Life has throwna a lot of things at me this
month.
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 10:17:33PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
>
> OpenAFS includes the Sun RPC code under the original, non-free license.
> That code was relicensed by Oracle under a BSD license (see
>
Source: amarok
Followup-For: Bug #1074670
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-mysql-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: reassign -1 src:mariadb mariadb/1:11.4.2-1
Control: retitle -1 please build again the embedded server, needed by amarok
Control: affects -1 + src:amarok
Hi,
this dependency issue happens becau
Package: sqitch
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: important
MariaDB 1:11.4.2-1 was recently uploaded to Debian. MariaDB 11.4 and MySQL 8.4
are slowly diverging more and more.
As a result of the new version the sqitch autopkgtests are currently failing,
but the reason is a bit unclear.
Could you please
Package: request-tracker5
Version: 5.0.5+dfsg-2
Severity: important
MariaDB 1:11.4.2-1 was recently uploaded to Debian. MariaDB 11.4 and MySQL 8.4
are slowly diverging more and more.
In MariaDB 11.4 the 'mysql' naming in filenames has shifted towards 'mariadb'.
Hence the request-tracker5 (both ve
Package: pdns-backend-mysql
Version: 4.9.1-1
Severity: important
MariaDB 1:11.4.2-1 was recently uploaded to Debian. MariaDB 11.4 and MySQL 8.4
are slowly diverging more and more.
In MariaDB 11.4 the 'mysql' naming in filenames has shifted towards 'mariadb'.
Hence the pdns autopkgtests are curren
Dear mentors,
After cleaning up some novice duplicate bug mistakes ...
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mangl":
* Package name: mangl
Version : 1.1.5-1
Upstream Author : Ziga Lenarcic
* URL : https://github.com/zigalenarcic/mangl
* License : BSD
Dear mentors,
After cleaning up some novice duplicate bug mistakes ...
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mangl":
* Package name: mangl
Version : 1.1.5-1
Upstream Author : Ziga Lenarcic
* URL : https://github.com/zigalenarcic/mangl
* License : BSD
Looking at the netconsole-setup shell script, the problem arises when
the kernel doesn't know (yet) about the destination address.
If you add a ping before the neighbour lookup it'll probably work.
So:
--- /usr/sbin/netconsole-setup 2024-06-22 08:56:28.0 +1000
+++ /var/tmp/netconsole-s
On 02/07/2024 21:48, наб wrote:
Package: coreutils
Version: 9.1-1
Version: 9.4-3
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
printf(1) says:
escaping non-printable characters with the proposed POSIX $'' syntax.
this syntax is real as of Issue 8 (POSIX.1-2024).
ls is probably also affected by this sinc
Hi Patrick,
On 2024-07-03 00:30:55 +0200, Patrick Franz wrote:
> this seems more a problem of apt than of Qt.
Even if apt could be improved, this would still be a bug in the
concerned packages, which must declare adequate relationships
to allow the upgrade. See
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Package: netconsole
Version: 0.3.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: ipv6
Dear Maintainer,
I do
netconsole-setup syslog-host
and see
arping: 2001:0db8:1000:2000::9: Address family for hostname not
supported
netconsole-setup: syslog-host: Cannot resolve MAC address of
2001:0db8:
Package: zlint
Version: 3.6.2-3
Severity: wishlist
The zlint binary package has Depends on two -dev packages:
golang-github-pelletier-go-toml-dev
golang-github-zmap-zcrypto-dev
Please remove these two Depends from the zlint binary package.
These aren't necessary since the binary package d
Hi Vincent,
this seems more a problem of apt than of Qt.
For some reason, apt is not able to resolve the dependencies when you
only want to upgrade libqt6core6t64, but is able to do so when you want
to upgrade libqt6core6t64 and wireshark.
To me, that means that the dependencies in Qt are corr
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mangl":
* Package name: mangl
Version : 1.1.5-1
Upstream Author : Ziga Lenarcic
* URL : https://github.com/zigalenarcic/mangl
* License : BSD-2-Claus
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 19:49, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Is it possible to skip the pkg-r-autopkgtest for this package?
>
> We did not implemented any hooks to realise this yet.
Wouldn't removing the following line from debian/control do it?
Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-r
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:39:27 +0200 Marco Mattiolo
wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> I'm the maintainer of plasma-mobile package in Debian, plus some of
> the related apps. At the moment, the present bug keeps meta-plasma-
> mobile metapackage out of trixie, thus letting the building of Mobian
> p
Package: coreutils
Version: 9.1-1
Version: 9.4-3
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
printf(1) says:
escaping non-printable characters with the proposed POSIX $'' syntax.
this syntax is real as of Issue 8 (POSIX.1-2024).
ls is probably also affected by this since it outputs these.
Best,
наб
--
Package: heimdal
Version: 7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintaner,
please add support for include and includedir directives in krb5.conf
to heimdal. This has been committed upstream already[1], and is
supported by MIT Kerberos.
Missing this feature is preventing closing a
diff --git a/update-initramfs b/update-initramfs
index 4bb8d8a..5fe7921 100755
--- a/update-initramfs
+++ b/update-initramfs
@@ -138,15 +138,16 @@ generate_initramfs()
if [ "${verbose}" = 1 ]; then
OPTS="-v ${OPTS}"
fi
+ initramfs_tmp=$(mktemp)
# shellcheck disa
Hi Georges!
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 07:17:41PM +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> Package: qt5-qmake
> Version: 5.15.13+dfsg-2
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I cannot currently rebuild the package xdrawchem, which uses qmake and
> also the library libopenbabel-dev
>
> A build log
Hi Graham,
Am Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 04:15:26PM + schrieb Graham Inggs:
> > r-cran-spatstat.core was removed from Debian. R-cran-spatstat.geom does
> > not depend from this package any more and the autopkgtest in Salsa CI is
> > fine[1]. Any hint why it fails in testing would be welcome.
>
>
Control: tags 1074224 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for crossfire (versioned as 1.75.0-6.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru crossfire-1.75.0/debian/changelog crossfire-1.75.0/debian/changelog
--- crossfi
Hi all,
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 12:06:44PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> I can confirm this build failure on my local system.
>
> Dmitry, do you have any idea off the top of your head as to the root cause?
> Do
> you think it is related to the recent upgrade from gcc-13 13.2.0 to 13.3.0?
More
I can confirm this build failure on my local system.
Dmitry, do you have any idea off the top of your head as to the root cause? Do
you think it is related to the recent upgrade from gcc-13 13.2.0 to 13.3.0?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
A good point - I will switch this to a Recommends: which will allow
installation on an icinga2 or nagios server.
On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 11:57 +0200, Frederik Himpe wrote:
> Source: monitoring-plugins-check-smart
> Version: 6.14.1-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> check_smart.pl can
Bruno Haible writes:
> Hi Samuel and Simon,
>
>> I believe you are right, and I
>> suggest the patch below. Bruno, what do you think?
>
> Yes, you are right. I have a package with a .gitattributes at the
> top-level and a src/ChangeLog, and the .gitattributes file has the
> desired effect. (Thin
hi, thanks. i have done as you suggest (raised upstream)
...at least hope so, assuming 'contact' linux-c...@vger.kernel.org listed at
following is way to go. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LinuxCIFS_utils
On Sunday 16 June 2024 at 14:54:05 BST, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
Thi
Hi Samuel and Simon,
> I believe you are right, and I
> suggest the patch below. Bruno, what do you think?
Yes, you are right. I have a package with a .gitattributes at the
top-level and a src/ChangeLog, and the .gitattributes file has the
desired effect. (Things may well have been different 16
On 01/07/2024 07:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Peter Michael Green (2024-06-30 13:41:42)
I am aware that v2 is already pending in experimental, but given the
pace of transitioning to a new branch, it is helpful to have the
rng.fill() function available faster, for packages to prepare for t
Hi Roland,
Roland Mas, on 2024-07-02:
> Le 02/07/2024 à 16:52, Roland Mas a écrit :
> > I'm unable to reproduce your bug in a clean up-to-date cowbuilder sid
> > chroot. I uploaded a new upstream release while investigating
> > (0.5.0~a5-1), let's see if the buildds manage to build it before
> > c
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:41:31 +0200 Michael Prokop wrote:
...
Would be great to get hwinfo back into Debian/testing to make sure
it finds its way into Debian/trixie also.
Due to a long chain of dependencies (live-task-base,
live-task-recommended, hw-probe, hwinfo, libx86emu), this bug rep
Hi Santiago,
I'm the maintainer of plasma-mobile package in Debian, plus some of the
related apps. At the moment, the present bug keeps meta-plasma-mobile
metapackage out of trixie, thus letting the building of Mobian
plasma-mobile images to fail [1]. As I wrote in the previous message,
looki
Source: bctoolbox
Version: 5.2.0-2.1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Control: block 1074248 by -1
Control: forwarded -1
https://gitlab.linphone.org/BC/public/bctoolbox/-/merge_requests/216
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi!
I'm working towards transitioning mbedtls from version
Samuel Bronson writes:
> Package: git-merge-changelog
> Version: 20140202+stable-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Your git-merge-changelog(1) manpage and the source file
> git-merge-changelog.c both say that you need a '.gitattributes' file in
> *every* directory. In fact, if you wa
Package: qt5-qmake
Version: 5.15.13+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I cannot currently rebuild the package xdrawchem, which uses qmake and
also the library libopenbabel-dev
A build log can be found at
https://salsa.debian.org/georgesk/xdrawchem/-/pipelines/691085
I could reproduce t
control: retitle -1 sequoia-chameleon-gnupg: unclear bug report, possibly
solved with new upstream version
control: severity -1 important
juliank: you reassigned #896834 to gpgv-from-sq amd made it serious,
while keeping the title ("apt-key fails in stretch") and in your last
t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kari Pahula
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gecode-snapshot
Version : 6.2.0+gitMMDD
Upstream Contact: Guido Tack , Mikael Zayenz Lagerkvist
* URL : https://www.gecode.org/
* License : MIT
Hi Emilio!
Il 2 luglio 2024 13:13:43 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha
scritto:
>Cool. btw I checked those packages and only these 3 are key packages:
>
>bctoolbox
>libgit2
>rustc
>
>It'd be nice to know if rustc will build if it wasn't for the disk space. Also
>it'd be good to have the other tw
Please upgrade to (or separately provide) branch v0.12.
This looks ready to go once rust-criterion and rust-test-case are fixed.
done
Package: btm
Package: elan
Package: git-delta
Package: hippotat
Package: precious
Package: python-maturin
Package: rust-av-metrics
Package: rust-cargo
Package:
Package: sploitscan
Version: 0.9.1-3
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
I have observed that sometimes sploitscan exits abnormally during
listing Further References:
$ sploitscan CVE-2024-6387
...
┌───[ 📚 Further References ]
|
├ https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024
Hi Andreas
> r-cran-spatstat.core was removed from Debian. R-cran-spatstat.geom does
> not depend from this package any more and the autopkgtest in Salsa CI is
> fine[1]. Any hint why it fails in testing would be welcome.
82s autopkgtest [21:16:20]: summary
82s run-unit-tes
Le 02/07/2024 à 16:52, Roland Mas a écrit :
Hi Étienne,
I'm unable to reproduce your bug in a clean up-to-date cowbuilder sid
chroot. I uploaded a new upstream release while investigating
(0.5.0~a5-1), let's see if the buildds manage to build it before
comparing your log and mine line-by-line
Package: rust-test-case
Version: 3.3.1-1
Tags: patch
We are currently looking at updating rust-itertools to 0.12,
the new version is available in experimental.
The Debian build-dependencies and test-dependencies have no
upper limit on the version, but the Cargo dev-dependency does,
so building r
On 2024-07-02 07:29, Prusty, Badrikesh wrote:
I have created, "bp/docker26" branch in my fork, did some incremental
changes to fix override_dh_auto_install:
https://salsa.debian.org/badrikesh/docker/-/commits/bp%2Fdocker26
62f28e5 golang-github-docker-docker-dev.install: update install files
Hello Colin,
Here is the output of apt/term.log:
Log started: 2024-07-02 00:04:13
(Reading database ... 64456 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../openssh-sftp-server_1%3a9.2p1-2+deb12u3_amd64.deb
...
Unpacking openssh-sftp-server (1:9.2p1-2+deb12u3) over (1:9.2p1-
I think I've tracked down the issue.
UM/Qt/qml/UM/SimpleButton.qml references a UI element called "ColorImage".
This class exists in Qt, but it's private and was probably changed/removed in
Qt6.
However, there's also a ColorImage class in Uranium (Cura's UI toolkit), and I
suspect they actuall
On 02/07/2024 22:56, Matthias Geiger wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 20:07:39 +0100 Matthias Geiger
> wrote:
>
>> starship needs gix, added as blocking bug. Thanks to the awesome work by
>> captol and ncts this is mostly done from what I can tell. Apart from
>> that cargo-debstatus lists those as mi
Package: libpam-google-authenticator
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
Please update the libpam-google-authenticator package from the upstream
at https://github.com/google/google-authenticator-libpam
The google-authenticator binary points to a Google URL that's no longer
valid to
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 03:05:16PM +, John Wellesz wrote:
> I used apt upgrade to install the security update available for
> openssh-server
>
>* What was the outcome of this action?
>
> It overwrote /etc/ssh/sshd_config without promtping, erasing the custom
> settings
> and almost loc
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:9.2p1-2+deb12u3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
A security update was available for openssh-server
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Upgrading to the latest available sec
Package: fuse3
Version: 3.14.0-4
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: iconium6...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Installing fuse3 via apt, sudo apt install fuse3 -y ; It deleted GNOME and
FLATPAK.
only some messages have been logs, mainly the deletion logs of GNOME and other:
Removing gnome-soft
Am Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 05:01:27PM +0800 schrieb Bo YU:
>
> I can confirm it works(still during build but pass the failed stage on
> the issue).
>
> It seems tille had worked a lot on this, so hope this helps.
I'm fine with whatever solution you might find and you can
perfectly skip me when doin
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:9.2p1-2+deb12u3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrading to the latest security update
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effec
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 20:07:39 +0100 Matthias Geiger
wrote:
>
> starship needs gix, added as blocking bug. Thanks to the awesome work by
> captol and ncts this is mostly done from what I can tell. Apart from
> that cargo-debstatus lists those as missing:
>
> notify-rust, process-control, system-st
Hi Étienne,
I'm unable to reproduce your bug in a clean up-to-date cowbuilder sid
chroot. I uploaded a new upstream release while investigating
(0.5.0~a5-1), let's see if the buildds manage to build it before
comparing your log and mine line-by-line :-)
Roland.
Package: nocache
Version: 1.1-1+b1
Severity: normal
joey@darkstar:~>nocache true
true: nocache.c:148: init_mutexes: Assertion `fds_lock != NULL' failed.
Aborted
- exit 134
Happens every time.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Package: libssl3
Version: 3.0.13-1~deb12u1
Severity: important
Control: affects -1 osslsigncode
Dear Maintainers,
Since the last upgrade of openssl on bookworm (version 3.0.13-1~deb12u1), code
signing using osslsigncode (and my Yubikey) now fails with a segmentation
fault. It was working properly
Source: cinder
Version: 2:21.1.0-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Title: Arbitrary file access through custom QCOW2 external data
Reporter: Martin Kaesberger
Products: Cinder, Glance, Nova
Description:
Martin Kaesberger reported a vulnerability in QCOW2 image processing
for Cinder, Glance and Nova.
Source: nova
Version: 2:26.1.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Title: Arbitrary file access through custom QCOW2 external data
Reporter: Martin Kaesberger
Products: Cinder, Glance, Nova
Description:
Martin Kaesberger reported a vulnerability in QCOW2 image processing
for Cinder, Glance and Nova. By
Source: glance
Version: 2:25.1.0-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Title: Arbitrary file access through custom QCOW2 external data
Reporter: Martin Kaesberger
Products: Cinder, Glance, Nova
Description:
Martin Kaesberger reported a vulnerability in QCOW2 image processing
for Cinder, Glance and Nova.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "django-anymail":
* Package name : django-anymail
Version : 11.0-1
Upstream contact : Mike Edmunds
* URL : https://github.com/anymail/django-anymail
* Licen
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 04:46:38PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 04:35:44PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 03:47:35PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> >>Could you please provide kmodsign tool like Ubuntu package does, so that
> >>we can sign
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: aio...@packages.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:aiodns
I intend to orphan the aiodns package.
The package description is:
aiodns provides a simple way for doing asynchronous DNS resolutions with a
synchronous look
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: pyca...@packages.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:pycares
I intend to orphan the pycares package.
The package description is:
pycares is a Python 3 module which provides an interface to c-ares. c-ares is
a C librar
reopen 1069130
tags 1069130 - patch
tags 1069130 + trixie sid
tags 1074660 + upstream
merge 1069130 1074660
thanks
On 7/2/24 2:51 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'mapnik-config'
The CMake build of Mapnik 4.0 no longer provides mapnik-config, only
Source: nvram-wakeup
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: theme-d
Version: 5.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: razercfg
Version: 0.43-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: rust-breezyshim
Version: 0.1.92-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: cura
Version: 5.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: mate-power-manager
Version: 1.26.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: vanguards
Version: 0.3.1-2.4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: meep-openmpi
Version: 1.25.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: mate-panel
Version: 1.27.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: python-skbio
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: rust-rand-core
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: nautilus-image-converter
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: shim-signed
Version: 1.43
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: meep-mpi-default
Version: 1.25.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: org-roam
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: pyqi
Version: 0.3.2+dfsg-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: rust-byte-slice-cast
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: rust-eui48
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: quelcom
Version: 0.4.0-18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: node-chokidar
Version: 3.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ruff
Version: 0.0.291+dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: gtkhash
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering direct
Source: pyvo
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
&
Source: ocaml-expect
Version: 0.0.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules cl
Source: virtnbdbackup
Version: 2.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: meep
Version: 1.25.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering direct
Source: golang-github-safchain-ethtool
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
