--dkg
On Tue 2022-04-12 20:38:47 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: dns-root-data
> Version: 2021011101
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> Durin
I will check.
The mRMR issue has been addressed. I will target a new release (and change
the build system to cmake, as autotools will be deprecated next release).
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:55 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
> On 4/12/22 20:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> checking for python scr
Hi,
Sean Whitton (2021-08-12):
> On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 04:08AM +02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > Whatever happens on the debian-policy front (if anything), I'd prefer if
> > lintian would stop emitting those errors on its own. It doesn't have to
> > follow the letter of Policy, does it?
>
> No,
Package: ck
Version: 0.7.1-6
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu jammy ubuntu-patch
Hi Daniel,
In Ubuntu, ck fails to build on armhf because the upstream build system is
passing an explicit -march option that is no longer correct because it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, d...@fifthhorseman.net
* Package name: python-sasl
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Todd Lipcon
* URL : https://github.com/cloudera/python-sasl
* License
11.04.2022 15:21, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Source: busybox
Version: 1:1.30.1-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi Aurelien,
would it be possible to avoid the udhcpc -> busybox dependency? It may
seem strange to remove busybox in a quest to reduce file system usage at
first, but if you need iproute2
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:37:32PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 03:08:12PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> >> I've prepared an NMU for xz-utils (versioned as 5.2.5-2.1) and
> >> uploaded it to DELAYE
Hi Salvatore,
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 03:08:12PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> I've prepared an NMU for xz-utils (versioned as 5.2.5-2.1) and
>> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
>> should delay it longer.
>
> I noted that the last up
Control: tags -1 + confirmed upstream
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/redacted/XKCD-password-generator/issues/138
Control: retitle -1 xkcdpass: FTBFS: test case raises “TypeError: … missing 1
required positional argument: 'self'”
Control: summary -1 0
The upstream test suite has a buggy
On Sat, 2 Apr 2022 00:06:04 +0200 MichaIng wrote:
>
> Package: chromium
> Version: 99.0.4844.74-1~deb11u1
>
> > Which boards did you test with?
>
> We observed the issue on these boards:
> - Odroid C2
> - Odroid C4
> - Odroid N2+
> - Radxa ROCK Pi 4
> - Radxa Zero
>
> > What desktops were you usin
Hi,
Thanks to tackle this.
Cheers,
--
Emmanuel Arias
@eamanu
yaerobi.com
OpenPGP_0xFA9DEC5DE11C63F1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: firmware-amd-graphics
Version: 20210818-1
Severity: Normal
thanks
The RX6500XT was released in January. It requires the "beige-goby" line
of firmware files, which were added upstream September of last year [1].
A refresh of the package is needed.
[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub
Package: mailscripts
Version: 0.24-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Attached is a patch (via git format-patch) for a script to re-inject
an existing message via sendmail. The script extracts the sender and
all recipients from the message and constructs the appropriate
sendmail command to re-send
Hi Yuri,
Yuri D'Elia writes:
[snip]
> Built with: '3.9' Detected: '3.10'
>
> due to python3 now defaulting to python3.10.
>
Thank you for reporting this bug :-)
[snip]
>
> This also requires that shiboken2 should be currently rebuilt.
>
Agreed.
> Either the python3 dependency should be tigh
Gentle ping :-)
Regards,
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Paul,
Thank you once again for taking the time to reply :-)
Paul Gevers writes:
> On 02-04-2022 00:13, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>>> On 24-02-2022 06:13, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
[snip]
>> It's been a few months since I contacted the CI Team about
>> isolation-machines, but they're not yet r
Hi Jussi (2022.04.09_07:18:01_-0400)
> This is due to we having to poke distutils internals because Debian
> patched distutils to produce different results for install directories
> than sysconfig (the latter was incorrect). Is there now a guarantee
> that starting with 3.10 sysconfig points to the
Saw the same error on a Fujitsu Lifebook U9311 booting from the current
Debian 11.3 ISO.
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> 12 апр. 2022 г., в 22:37, Jeroen Ploemen wrote:
>
> Please remove the moreinfo tag (and CC me directly) once you have an
> updated package ready.
Hi Jeron,
thank you for review, that was very helpful!
You can see diff:
https://salsa.debian.org/faunris/i
On 4/12/22 20:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
checking for python script directory (pythondir)...
${PYTHON_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
checking for python extension module directory (pyexecdir)...
${PYTHON_EXEC_PREFIX}/lib/python3.10/site-packages
checking for python3.10... (cached) /usr/bin
Package: nextcloud-desktop
Version: 3.1.1-2+deb11u1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Hi,
I am running nextcloud-desktop in my .xsessionrc. When it starts, it
also fires up chromium, which I have installed, but which I rarely use.
Also, for a number of other activities, which were formerly part
tags 1009383 + pending
thanks
Fix pending in git, which is (preferably) waiting on upload until votca
finally clears NEW
--
Nicholas Breen
nbr...@debian.org
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 02:33:50PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Package: podman
> Version: 4.0.1+ds1-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to install
>
> I wanted to try podman 4.0 from experimental, but I can't install it:
> This is on a testing machine, with unstable and experimental
On 4/12/22 08:02, Anthony Callegaro wrote:
Hi guys,
I tried a few additional things to try to sort it out :
- downgraded to my latest upgrade date :
cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/snapshot.list
deb [check-valid-until=no]
http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-security/20220404T151623Z/
sta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rime-scj
Version : 0.0~git20190120
Upstream Author : Gong Chen
* URL : https://github.com/rime/rime-scj
* License : GPL-3.0
Programming Lang: N/A
Description : Rime Input Method Engine schema data - Fast
Package: findimagedupes
Version: 2.19.1-1+b1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: c...@jhnc.org
Hi debian maintainers, thanks for all your work.
I'm the author of findimagedupes.
The original findimagedupes Perl script includes inline C code
and autogenerates files at runtime in: /usr/local/lib/findim
Control: notfound 995753 1.0.2-1
Control: close 995753
On Fri, 08 Oct 2021 15:51:52 +0300 Vladimir K wrote:
> Confirming, the cause is partial mesa upgrade.
> Got the full mesa set from unstable today, no longer having this issue.
Given that the core issue is partial mesa upgrade which has been
Source: ruby-i18n, ruby-i18n-inflector
Control: found -1 ruby-i18n/1.10.0-1
Control: found -1 ruby-i18n-inflector/2.6.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of ruby-i18n the autopkgtest of r
Control: tags -1 pending
On 4/12/22 20:17, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
ImportError: cannot import name 'Iterable' from 'collections'
(/usr/lib/python3.10/collections/__init__.py)
This was fixed in git some time ago.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41
Hi Alban!
>For already installed kodi-repository-kodi your fix requires the user to go to
>Settings > Add-ons > Install from repository
>and there right click on "Kodi Add-on repository" and clicking on
>"Check for update".
>That fixed the language addon version and the installation went fine.
>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 09:18:34PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Am 12.04.22 um 21:04 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
> > Thanks for filing this. I fixed it yesterday in the salsa Git repo for
> > zchunk packaging:
> >
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/zchunk/-/commit/79c480ffa9df4305c
Source: node-querystring
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-readable-stream
Version: 3.6.0+~cs3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-browserify-aes
Version: 1.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-browser-pack
Version: 6.1.0+ds+~6.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-ieee754
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-ripemd160
Version: 2.0.2-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-optimist
Version: 0.6.1+~0.0.30-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-serve-static
Version: 1.14.2+~1.13.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-safe-buffer
Version: 5.2.1+~cs2.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-meow
Version: 8.0.0+~cs3.21.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-katex
Version: 0.13.11+~cs6.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-buffer-shims
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-recast
Version: 0.21.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-ts-jest
Version: 27.1.4+~cs0.2.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-syntax-error
Version: 1.4.0+~1.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-debbundle-es-to-primitive
Version: 1.2.1+~cs9.7.15-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: node-process-nextick-args
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-output-file-sync
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-npm-bundled
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-brfs
Version: 2.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-tape
Version: 5.5.2+~cs8.20.16-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-trysound-sax
Version: 0.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-extend
Version: 3.0.2+~3.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-config-chain
Version: 1.1.12-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-fd-slicer
Version: 1.1.0+repack1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-follow-redirects
Version: 1.14.9+~1.14.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-difflet
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-zrender
Version: 5.3.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-inline-source-map
Version: 0.6.2~git-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-qs
Version: 6.10.3+ds+~6.9.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-uvu
Version: 0.5.3+~cs4.10.3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-browser-unpack
Version: 1.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-chownr
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-configstore
Version: 6.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-transformers
Version: 3.1.0+~1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-performance-now
Version: 2.1.0+debian-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-cache-loader
Version: 4.1.0+~cs2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-call-limit
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-dashdash
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-stack-utils
Version: 2.0.5+~2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-proper-lockfile
Version: 4.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-aproba
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-findit2
Version: 2.2.3-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-module-deps
Version: 6.2.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-stream-splicer
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-mkdirp
Version: 1.0.4+~1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-fs.realpath
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-parse-base64vlq-mappings
Version: 0.1.4-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-mute-stream
Version: 0.0.8+~0.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-falafel
Version: 2.2.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-convert-source-map
Version: 1.8.0+~1.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-lynx
Version: 0.2.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-invariant
Version: 2.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-ini
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: node-isexe
Version: 2.0.0+~2.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-json-parse-better-errors
Version: 1.0.2+~cs3.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: node-asn1
Version: 0.2.6+~0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-csstype
Version: 3.0.11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-stable
Version: 0.1.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-are-we-there-yet
Version: 3.0.0+~1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-stream-browserify
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-browserify-zlib
Version: 0.2.0+20170820git8b3f0a862f6b+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant
Source: node-jsonstream
Version: 1.3.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-combine-source-map
Version: 0.8.0+ds-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-callback-stream
Version: 1.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: node-libravatar
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: node-lexical-scope
Version: 1.2.0+dfsg1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-prr
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: node-har-validator
Version: 5.1.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
1 - 100 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
