control: reassign -1 sway
Hello,
On Wed 02 Jun 2021 at 08:09AM GMT, Daniel Eklof wrote:
> Hi (author of foot here),
>
> I happened to see this bug, and it caught my interest. What I found is this:
>
> SIGPIPE is Sway's doing. It configures it to be ignored (by setting its
> signal handler to SI
control: reassign -1 libqt5core5a
control: affects -1 qbittorrent-nox
control: tags -1 -unreproducible
control: block -1 by 989744
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 12:03:15 +0200 Hovno Cuc wrote:
> Hello,
> I think the issue for me is, that with libqt5core5a 5.15.2+dfsg-5 the
> qbittorrent-nox reports this co
tags 926175 moreinfo
thanks
--
Best regards,
Brian T
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Felix C. Stegerman"
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, f...@obfusk.net
* Package name: jiten-nonfree-data
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Felix C. Stegerman
* URL : https://github.com/obfusk/jiten
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Felix C. Stegerman"
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, f...@obfusk.net
* Package name: jiten
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Felix C. Stegerman
* URL : https://github.com/obfusk/jiten
* License : AGPLv3+ (co
Every unexpected behavior is a potential bug. We shouldn't close this bug
yet. Nicholas, are you still seeing this behavior?
--
Best regards,
Brian T
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 6/27/21 8:48 PM, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> Debian now has dh-vim-addon [1] to manage the installation procedure of
> vim packages. It does "the right thing" (makes vim packages suitable for
> the "new" vim :packadd feature) and generally helps make all vim
> pa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: clay stan
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: udisks2-qt5
Version : 5.0.5
Upstream Author : linuxdeepin
* URL : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/udisks2-qt5
License : LGPL-3+
Source: apt
Version: 2.2.4
Severity: wishlist
Hey there.
It would be nice if the sources.list options Valid-Until-Min/Valid-Until-Max
would allow to be set to 0 or -1 in order to ignore any set value of their
respective defaults Acquire::Min-ValidTime and Acquire::Max-ValidTime.
The idea is as
In order to attempt to prevent the i915 error, this command was used: aptitude
-t unstable install firmware-misc-nonfree
This installed firmware-misc-nonfree_20210315-2_all.deb.
After rebooting, it seems to solve the i915 error. The power consumption (+25%
compared to Debian 10.9) initially did
One more (yes I know, it's not really belonging to the original bug
report, but it seems stupid to open another one just for this):
apt.conf(5) references:
/usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz
but this is apparently no longer a .gz
Cheers,
Chris.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bdale Garbee
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: librnd
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Author : Tibor Palinkas
* URL : http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-rnd
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
There is a pristine-tar branch on both salsa and my GitHub fork repo
barak/...
Bobi cómo entró a tu servidor
On 2021-06-28 00:35, Diederik de Haas wrote:
On zondag 27 juni 2021 22:37:10 CEST Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Let's ask the release team instead. Here my arguments why: nfs-utils
needs a major rehaul, this was not possible to finish in time for
bullseye, so this means nfs-utils is generally in n
Ok, the pipeline is launched. Thanks for the invitation ;)
I would not say that I'm very involved, actually. If I can help, I'm glad, but
if I don't have to, I'm happy :)
If you have difficulties with something, drop me an email.
As for the pipeline, it failed, because it seems that there is no
On zondag 27 juni 2021 22:37:10 CEST Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Let's ask the release team instead. Here my arguments why: nfs-utils
> needs a major rehaul, this was not possible to finish in time for
> bullseye, so this means nfs-utils is generally in not a very good
> shape for bullseye,detail
Source: nuspell
Version: 4.2.0-1
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: dm...@hotmail.com
The debian control file has few bugs:
1. There are extra unused dependencies: libboost and ronn are not
needded at all. They were used in older version.
2. The short description should be changed from "spell checker"
Few more further minor things in sources.list(5):
1) Check-Date, unlike all the other options, doesn't mention it's
default.
2) For:
• Valid-Until-Min (valid-until-min) and Valid-Until-Max
(valid-until-max) can be used to raise or lower the time period in
seconds
Source: rust-file-diff
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rust-file-diff.html
...
dh_shlibdeps -O--buildsystem=cargo
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library libglib-2.0.so.0 needed by
debian/librust-file-diff-de
Sure, always happy for help. Please do!
Would you like to take the package, or co-maintain, team-maintain,
whatever it's called nowadays?
I was using it for teaching, whereas you seem much more involved.
Thanks for the update (and for all the work).
Is it OK if I change what needs to be so that the package gets automatically
built on salsa's CI, with lintian and everything launched on it?
(I'm a DD so I have the technical right to do so, but I'm asking for your
permission anyway)
Thanks, Mt.
tags 990265 + moreinfo
outlook 990265 let's fight this out on the Austin mailing list
thanks
Vincent Lefevre dixit:
>because the result of "pwd > /dev/full" is non POSIX conforming.
I'm still not convinced, but let's take this elsewhere then until
we have some definite statements us shell mainta
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
On 6/27/21 10:59 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021, Robbi Nespu wrote:
Hi,
Could you update to the latest version?
Unfortunately no, since we are in deep freeze and what is here now will
be what will be released in Bullseye. After the relea
Hi Hakan!
Updated ~local1: https://fex.net/s/fvdo3rs
--
Vasyl Gello
==
Certified SolidWorks Expert
Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77
E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com
Skype: vasek.gello
==
호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽
Samuel Thibault, le dim. 27 juin 2021 23:06:03 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault, le ven. 18 juin 2021 19:27:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Samuel Thibault, le dim. 16 mai 2021 19:03:11 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > Gregor Zattler, le dim. 16 mai 2021 18:50:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > > * Samuel Thibault [13. Mai. 2
reopen 990264
reopen 990265
thanks
because the result of "pwd > /dev/full" is non POSIX conforming.
See the message from Don Cragun in the Austin Group list, which says:
Section 1.4 of the Commands and Utilities Volume of the standard
(Utility Description Defaults) already does this in the CONSE
Package: apt
Version: 2.2.4
Severity: wishlist
Hey.
It would be nice if the sources.list(5) manpage could clarify whether
file URI schema is secure (or not) when the archive is not under local
control by a trusted user.
>From the manpage:
> copy
> The copy scheme is identical to
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2020.20200327.54578-7
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@serenevy.net
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrading to bullseye from buster, several of my latex documents
are not compiling correctly.
The problem occurs in files using pstricks and compiling into PDF
documen
Samuel Thibault, le ven. 18 juin 2021 19:27:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault, le dim. 16 mai 2021 19:03:11 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Gregor Zattler, le dim. 16 mai 2021 18:50:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > * Samuel Thibault [13. Mai. 2021]:
> > > > Kurt Roeckx, le jeu. 19 nov. 2020 20:40:05 +0100, a ecrit
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Please unblock package rdiff-backup
rdiff-backup is a sort of rsync-like backup tool. It happens that the
version that will be shipped in Bullseye (2.0.5) has a network protocol
tha
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:23:39AM +0200, Nunzio wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 5.10.40-1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
>* What led up to the situation?
Package: thunderbird
Followup-For: Bug #783892
Dear Maintainer,
1:78.11.0-2 fixed this issue for me. Just to let you know.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
APT prefers testing-security
APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64
Hi Drew,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:37:14PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 04:46:36PM +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Package: nfs-common
> > Followup-For: Bug #883194
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
> > Control: severity 883194 serious
> > C
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 04:46:36PM +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Package: nfs-common
> Followup-For: Bug #883194
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
> Control: severity 883194 serious
> Control: usertag 883194 py2removal
>
> Since removing Python2 is a release goal for bullseye (ot
On Sun, 2021-06-27 at 20:03 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>
> According to popcon pcscd is installed on 23796 systems.
> But 10 years ago it was almost 0 (maybe less than 1000)
> https://ludovicrousseau.blogspot.com/2020/04/smart-card-usage-in-debian-popcon.html
Well popcon is not representative
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andreas,
First off, a huge thanks for the enormous amount of QA work you're
doing. It's truly great. Please don't take this reply as a "no", I
really just wish to discuss my concerns in the open.
On 10-06-2021 19:25, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> mono packaging contains
Package: src:jinja2
Version: 2.11.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainer,
At the moment, the python3-jinja2 binary package ships vim extensions.
In my opinion, it doesn't really make sense to install these files in
this package, as people might not have vim installed at all.
Would it be possible
Hi Hakan!
Looks like I forgot adding "unset LANG LC_ALL LC_CTYPE" at the beginning of
/usr/bin/kodi
With that line added, everything starts properly in both cases.
I am building a ~local1 but if you can, please quickly test the solution!
--
Vasyl Gello
==
1565781747 E Could not create download: Info hash already used by
another torrent.
1565781771 C Caught signal: 'Erreur de segmentation.
---DUMP---
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:42:04 UTC
Severity: *grave*
Tags: fixed-upstream, upstream
Found in version curl/7.65.1-1
Fixed in version curl/7.65.3-1
Sarim.love.mak.7
Package: src:vim-puppet
Version: vim-puppet 4~20181115+git4793b074-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainer,
Debian now has dh-vim-addon [1] to manage the installation procedure of
vim packages. It does "the right thing" (makes vim packages suitable for
the "new" vim :packadd feature) and generally
Package: src:vim-ledger
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainer,
Debian now has dh-vim-addon [1] to manage the installation procedure of
vim packages. It does "the right thing" (makes vim packages suitable for
the "new" vim :packadd feature) and generally helps make all vim
packages c
Package: src:icinga2
Version: 2.12.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainer,
Debian now has dh-vim-addon [1] to manage the installation procedure of
vim packages. It does "the right thing" (makes vim packages suitable for
the "new" vim :packadd feature) and generally helps make all vim
packages con
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Daniele
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 at 18:34, Daniele Tricoli wrote:
> Is there something I can do now? Sorry for the new amount of work... :/
These things happen. :) I don't think there's anything we can do now,
except wait to see the results of the autopkgtests.
Regar
Le 27/06/2021 à 17:07, Christoph Anton Mitterer a écrit :
On Sun, 2021-06-27 at 16:50 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
What is the output of the commmand:
cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/pcscd.conffiles
Just:
/etc/init.d/pcscd
Not sure where dpkg keeps actually track of it's (obsolete) conffiles,
I thin
Fixed in git.
https://salsa.debian.org/nm-team/nm.debian.org/-/commit/2554b3160e9b67ec1b6c3fe3dc50ef1169066ca2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Control: reassign -1 src:shim
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 18:18:51 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
>* In insecure mode, don't abort if we can't create the MokListXRT
> variable. Upstream issue #372. Closes: #989962, #990158
Bug 990158 was assigned to shim-signed. As this is closed by src:s
Package: supertuxkart-data
Version: 0.9.3-2
The game Supertuxkart does not meet the criteria for inclusion
in the free software Debian repositories, specifically by containing
proprietary data (violating
https://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html#not_just_code).
These include the game character
Anuradha Weeraman dixit:
>"At program start-up, three streams shall be predefined and already open:
>stdin (standard input, for conventional input) for reading, stdout
>(standard output, for conventional output) for writing, and stderr
>(standard error, for diagnostic output) for writing." [1]
Is
Hi
Peter Pentchev píše v Ne 27. 06. 2021 v 13:45 +0300:
> So, Michal, do these changes look reasonable to you? If they do,
> I can push them to the pkg-rpm/rpm repo itself, upload a new version
> to
> unstable, and send an unblock request to the release team.
I won't have time to review the chang
Dear Roger,
I am going to upgrade the affected systems to bullseye and will check
this issue while doing so. But looks like it should be solved indeed.
Thanks for reminding me about this bug report.
All the best
--
Grzegorz Szymaszek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package node-color-string
[ Reason ]
node-color-string is vulnerable to a Regex Denial of Service (ReDoS)
reported in CVE-2021-29060
[ Impact ]
Little vulnerability
[ Tests
Hello Graham,
many thanks for your review!
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:05:05AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> I think unblocking is 1.26.5-1 feasible. However, python3-urllib3 has
> a large number of reverse-dependencies. Would you please upload to
> experimental so we can see the results of the aut
On 2021-06-26 sawb...@xsmail.com wrote:
> On 26 Jun 2021 at 15:12, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > I think that assumption is not correct. dpkg will (should) only ask
> > about the confffile if it *was* locally changed, otherwise the files are
> > overwritten without asking.
> I see ...
> The thing is
close 990264
thanks
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 01:49:55PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre dixit:
>
> >Like with ksh93, output error is not checked for some builtins
> >(at least pwd and ulimit), e.g. after closing stdout.
> >
> >$ exec >&-
> >$ for i in echo pwd print ulimit; do echo
Shutter 0.97 fixes several regressions which have been introduced by the
GTK3 port in the 0.96 release. I guess it can be packaged now!
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This is a pre-approval request for feature-check/0.2.2-3+deb10u1 to
fix the #990276 RC bug already fixed in unstable.
[ Reason ]
See #990276 (https://bugs.debian.org/990276): Versio
On Sun, 2021-06-27 at 16:50 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> What is the output of the commmand:
> cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/pcscd.conffiles
Just:
/etc/init.d/pcscd
Not sure where dpkg keeps actually track of it's (obsolete) conffiles,
I think it's in:
/var/lib/dpkg/status: /etc/reader.conf.d/0comme
Please delete this report completely.
Thank you!
Hello,
Le 23/06/2021 à 18:36, Christoph Anton Mitterer a écrit :
On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 15:18 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
/etc/reader.conf.d/0comments was listed in debian/pcscd.install so it
should have been removed on upgrade unless you modified it. No?
Hmm I don't think I'd have ever mod
Package: nfs-common
Followup-For: Bug #883194
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Control: severity 883194 serious
Control: usertag 883194 py2removal
Since removing Python2 is a release goal for bullseye (other packages
have been removed because of their python2 dependencies), and since
Package: munin-node
Version: 2.0.67-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Systemd unit fails with 'Couldn't open pid file "/var/run/munin/munin-node.pid"
[No such file or directory]', as the PID directory in /run is not created on
unit startup.
* What led up to the situation?
Upgraded
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package alttab to fix a buffer overflow RC bug.
It is marked for autoremoval on June 29, so I realize that it might
be a bit too late, but I still thought I'd try.
[ Reason ]
On 2021-06-27 01:10:20 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> This is a pre-approval request before I upload donkey-1.2.0-6
> to unstable in order to fix an RC bug. Thanks in advance, and
Package: cfengine3
Version: 3.15.2-3
Hi,
cfengine3 fails to build with OpenSSL 3.0 beta 1 with the
following error:
In file included from hash.c:33:
./hash.h:64:28: error: unknown type name RSA
64 | Hash *HashNewFromKey(const RSA *rsa, HashMethod method);
|^~~
On Sun, 2021-06-27 at 15:00 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I fail to see the security benefit here? What do we gain by (not)
> pre-allocating a system group like systemd-coredump?
Well it's not a big issue... but as always: something that is not even
there, may not be abused in the first place.
Hey.
On Sun, 2021-06-27 at 14:46 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> To me this looks like CVEs in other products, but which zookeeper
> uses
> as dependency? Is this correct?
Indeed, but I couldn't find that the zookeeper package depends on these
while it does contain:
zookeeper-3.4.13/src$ fin
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Grzegorz,
Per the posts below, I guess this issue is already resolved.
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1685794
- https://lwn.net/Articles/760121/
Can you kindly confirm at your side?
Thank you!
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG
Am 26.06.21 um 20:40 schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer:
On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 20:07 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
You can try to convince upstream to split up the (monolithic)
systemd.conf this way though.
I've asked them to consider this in:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/20044
Than
[Disclaimer, not the package maintainer, but quickly checked your
report for tracking within the security team]
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 01:50:44PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Source: zookeeper
> Version: 3.4.13-6
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
Package: console-common
Version: 0.7.91
Severity: normal
Hey.
Seems tempfile is deprecated and mktemp should be used instead:
# dpkg-reconfigure console-data
Looking for keymap to install:
de-latin1-nodeadkeys
WARNING: tempfile is deprecated; consider using mktemp instead.
WARNING: tempfile is
Hi Hakan!
That's strange! Please send the debug Kodi log and pay attention if the string
"19883" is present in it (that's the upstream ticket number).
--
Vasyl Gello
==
Certified SolidWorks Expert
Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77
E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmai
Source: manuskript
Version: 0.11.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for manuskript.
CVE-2021-35196[0]:
| ** https://cve.mitre.org/about/faqs.html#disputed_signify_in_
| cve_entry">DISPU
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nemo
[ Reason ]
The patch taken upstream and applied in nemo 4.8.6-2 avoid some issues
with favorites
[ Impact ]
Using favorites there is an easy risk to have iss
Hi Agustin,
I have no plan to extensively test your patch, I just quickly tried it.
I do not see "variable is void" in both scenarios any more. I do not
know if the following is an intended change. On attempt of customization
before loading of ispell, with original version I get "CHANGED outside
On 2021-06-26 Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-06-26, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> So I think the proper fix (for the very real bug) would be to pass
>> CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/bash to configure.
> I believe I did at one point try that, but will test again to be sure.
diffomatic seems to be happy
control: fixed -1 6.30.223.271-16
Dear Diego,
Finally all your patches reached bullseye (stable to be) and buster
(backports). :-)
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 2:21 AM Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
>
> Hey Roger,
>
> Apologies for the radio silence. I just saw that this email ended up
> in the spam
Package: certmonger
Version: 0.79.13-3
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with OpenSSL 3.0 beta 1.
The problem is that EVP_PKEY_base_id has been renamed to
EVP_PKEY_get_base_id. There is a define to rename it:
/usr/include/openssl/evp.h:# define EVP_PKEY_base_id EVP_PKEY_get_base_id
But your
Hi,
First of all, thanks to everyone involved for their work on Debian!
So as a relatively new member of the pkg-rpm team (mainly to work on
createrepo-c and the packages that it depends), I wondered if it were
time to try my hand at helping out with some other packages.
Michal, I have cloned th
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 01:45:58PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, thanks to everyone involved for their work on Debian!
>
> So as a relatively new member of the pkg-rpm team (mainly to work on
> createrepo-c and the packages that it depends), I wondered if it were
> time to
Package: caml-crush
Version: 1.0.10-4
Hi,
Your package is failing to build against OpenSSL 3.0 beta 1. The
log file show:
configure:6589: checking for SSL_get_peer_certificate in -lssl
configure:6614: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=.
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format
Hello,
was searching more and seems like the following bug (which is resolved) is
fixing the issue:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989744
I've tried the deb file attached to comment 37 and it fixes the issue.
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.5.1.0
Hi,
In 4.9 "Main building script: debian/rules", we find the following
paragraph under the description "build (required)":
"""
> For some packages, notably ones where the same source tree is compiled in
> different ways to produce two binary packages, the
Hello,
I think the issue for me is, that with libqt5core5a 5.15.2+dfsg-5 the
qbittorrent-nox reports this content type:
content-type: text/html
while with version 5.15.2+dfsg-7 it reports the following content type:
content-type: application/x-extension-html
and firefox instead of displaying th
Yeah, I think right now it's in good shape. I'm waiting for an
official upstream release, at which point I'll upload.
Since it's not in Debian right now, there's no reason to hold off
until after the Debian release. (If there were I'd upload to
Debian/experimental.)
I've been tracking the upstream
Just wanted to chime in with this upstream issue:
https://github.com/jonls/redshift/issues/672
It seems to me, like something along this fix, would be enough:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/redshift/-/merge_requests/4/diffs
+owner @{HOME}/.config/redshift/redshift.conf r,
Just discovered this
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:20:49 +0100 Robert Luberda wrote:
> Package: debhelper
> Version: 9.20150101
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> It would be nice if debhlper could have override_*-common target
> for stuff that is needed by both override_*-arch and override_*-indep
Package: swig4.0
Version: 4.0.2-1
Unfortunately, the last released upstream swig version lacked support
for nodejs12, which is the version that bullseye ships. I've identified
the following four patches from upstream that are needed on top of 4.0.2:
554aeead5 Introduce macros to support both Hand
Package: python3-websockify
Severity: important
Version: 0.9.0+dfsg1-2+b1
Hi,
I played with websockify and NoVNC recently and discovered that
websockify's program wrapper mode is currently broken in Debian 11:
```
[sunweaver@sunobo ~]$ websockify 127.0.0.1:9898 -- x11vnc -noipv6 -display :0
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021, Robbi Nespu wrote:
> Could you update to the latest version?
Unfortunately no, since we are in deep freeze and what is here now will
be what will be released in Bullseye. After the release (or before that
if I have time to upload to experimental) we will release TL2021 and the
Am 22.03.19 um 12:55 schrieb Graeme Vetterlein:
> Package: fetchmail
> Version: 6.3.26-3
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>
> I've just hit an "issue" WRT fetchmail, which I now relaise I hit about 10
> years ago and didn't report
> (shame on me) the "fix" is a simple text ed
93 matches
Mail list logo
