Bug#621820: xfce4-netload-plugin: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: os.h:125:28: error: net/ppp_defs.h: No such file or directory

block 621820 by 577494 reassign 621820 xfce4-netload-plugin retitle 621820 xfce4-netload-plugin: Needs to be ported from if_ppp to ppp(8) on GNU/kFreeBSD thanks Hi! On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:54:33 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 23:45:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wr

Re: POSIX_FADV_*

Hi! On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 22:17:40 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > I'm seeing some packages [0] FTBFS because of undefined > POSIX_FADV_*. Google suggests these may be missing from freebsd > (still?). Haven't really tried working around that much yet. Unconditionaly assuming presence of these i

Re: Bug#637693: hivex: FTBFS (kfreebsd): error: 'O_CLOEXEC' undeclared (first use in this function)

Hi! On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 22:10:03 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote: > * Christoph Egger: > > Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* buildds: > > /bin/bash ../libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 > > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lib -I.. -I../../../gnulib/lib > > -I../..

Re: Bug#630203: libpmount: FTBFS: error: field 'export' has incomplete type

reassign 630203 kfreebsd-kernel-headers retitle 630203 kfreebsd-kernel-headers: missing type to define 'export' field in headers breaks program compilation affects 630203 libpmount thanks Hi! On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 12:12:21 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > Your package failed to build on the kfree

Re: Bug#644431: theunarchiver: FTBFS(kfreebsd): undefined reference to `reallocf'

Hi! On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 21:36:16 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > Package: src:theunarchiver > Version: 2.7.1-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid wheezy > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > Your package faile

Bug#644669: freebsd-utils: Consider importing iostat from upstream

Hi! On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 01:50:19 +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > > > in order to avoid the conflict with "sysstat". However, the > > > [...] > > > > Could you explain this conflict in more detail? Why can't iostat be > > in /usr/bin? > A priori the package "sysstat" installs the file "/us

Re: Please test zfsutils 9.0~svn226163-1

Hi! On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:43:22 +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > On 10.10.2011 07:06, Robert Millan wrote: > > This wouldn't be accepted in Debian archive. There's an RFP for this > > library, but it needs some cleanup in debian/copyright before it can > > be uploaded IIRC. > > Note we do this alrea

Re: Please test zfsutils 9.0~svn226163-1

On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 01:35:36 +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > * We could get rid of the last delta in 01_glibc_kludge.diff and the > whole (hacky and ugly) 16-wrap-cdefs.diff if kfreebsd-kernel-headers > would export cdefs.h like it does upstream [2]. As Petr has said is already exported by eglibc, th

Getting rid of type-handling from the archive

Hi! I've been filing bug reports on packages Build-Depending on type-handling to switch to native arch wildcards, the bugs still open are: #639117 [w|+| ] e2tools: Remove unused type-handling from Build-Depends #639332 [w|+| ] buildcross: Remove deprecated Depends on type-handling #639164

Bug#645469: bind() fails for AF_UNIX sockets with EINVAL

On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 13:44:29 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/10/16 Jonathan Nieder : > > More importantly, there is the question you raised of whether this > > should be done in userspace by libc instead.  That would avoid > > upstream having to wonder, "why should we care what happens when >

Bug#274747: type-handling: 274747: dpkg-dev dependency removal

Hi! On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 00:58:30 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Robert Millan , 2011-11-16, 18:18: > >>I just added Depends: linux to iotop (arch all, written in > >>python and depends on a Linux kernel) before I realised that > >>type-handling pulls in dpkg-dev. I would really appreciate it if >

Bug#274747: type-handling: 274747: dpkg-dev dependency removal

Hi! On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 02:47:33 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jakub Wilk , 2011-11-17, 12:18: > > > Ah, thanks for the list Jakub! Is that exhaustive, against all > > > possible Provides generated by type-handling or only a selected > > > few? > > > > I believe it's exhaustive, but I'll double-c

Bug#649234: type-handling: Planned removal tracking bug

Source: type-handling Version: 0.2.23 Severity: serious Hi! This is a tracking bug report for the removal of the package, once the blocking bugs have been fixed or we decide we want to remove it regardless (ideally before wheezy is released), this can be reassigned to ftp-master for the removal f

Bug#631639: proposed workaround for __unused problem

Hey Robert, On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 19:51:02 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > Please can you comment on my proposed workaround in bug #631639? Sorry for the disappearence regarding libbsd and libmd, I've been tied up with other stuff and never got to finalize the bureaucratic part of the libmd release

Bug#631639: __unused in libbsd. workaround for #522773 (linux) and #522774 (libc)

On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 17:24:00 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > That won’t help. The overlay mode uses pkg-config which no BSD thing > touches. Well, even OpenBSD has its own re-implementation: regards, guillem

Bug#653193: Missing patch

On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 11:56:45 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > +#define __FAVOR_BSD 1 > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#undef __FAVOR_BSD > > Shouldn't this kind of fix be in libbsd-dev? E.g. in overlay netinet/in.h: > > #if __FAVOR_B

Bug#631639: __unused in libbsd. workaround for #522773 (linux) and #522774 (libc)

Hi! On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 19:06:48 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: libbsd-dev > Version: 0.3.0-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > > This patch implements a workaround for __unused name collision with Linux and > Glibc. The trick

Bug#631639: __unused in libbsd. workaround for #522773 (linux) and #522774 (libc)

On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 04:27:54 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 19:06:48 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > Package: libbsd-dev > > Version: 0.3.0-1 > > Severity: wishlist > > Tags: patch > > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: kf

Re: Bug#655865: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: field 'export' has incomplete type

reassign 655865 kfreebsd-kernel-headers retitle 655865 kfreebsd-kernel-headers: missing type to define 'export' field in headers breaks program compilation affects 630203 src:libpmount forcemerge 630203 655865 thanks Hi! On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 13:44:17 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Source: libpm

Re: Bug#655865: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: field 'export' has incomplete type

On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 13:41:12 +, Robert Millan wrote: > El 14 de gener de 2012 19:17, Guillem Jover ha escrit: > > This is a problem with the newer kfreebsd-kernel-headers, reassigning. > > Actually it's not. Upstream considers that users of some headers are > res

Re: sysvinit: FTBFS on kfreebsd due to missing sys/signalfd.h

Hi! On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 21:42:17 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > Package: sysvinit > Version: 2.88dsf-19 > Severity: normal > > cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat > -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -W -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE > -DACCTON_OFF -c -o last.o last.c >

Re: Bug#659280: libpmount: FDTBFS(kfreebsd): missing include?

Hi! On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 20:02:05 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Package: src:libpmount > Version: 0.0.15 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid wheezy > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Justification: fails to build from source (but b

Re: Bug #550611: please use libbsd instead of glib for strlcpy

Hi! On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 18:45:53 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > As mentioned above, I'm looking forward to the inclusion to base > system of this package, but in the way to achieve this, libbsd0 is not > priority:important, what's your opinion? This is the other way around, once you've proposed to mov

Re: Bug#657772: collectd: FTBFS(kfreebsd): deprecated libbsd-dev usage and Werror

clone 657772 -1 reassign -1 libkvm-dev retitle -1 libkvm-dev: Should use retitle 657772 libbsd-dev: Should not provide severity 657772 important thanks On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 18:04:42 +, Robert Millan wrote: > reassign 657772 libbsd-dev > found 657772 0.3.0-1 > retitle 657772 libbsd-dev: plea

Bug#649234: RM: type-handling -- RoM; unmaintained, debian specific, obsoleted by dpkg arch wildcards

retitle 649234 RM: type-handling -- RoM; unmaintained, debian specific, obsoleted by dpkg arch wildcards severity 649234 normal reassign 649234 ftp.debian.org thanks Hi! On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 12:58:36 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Guillem Jover , 2011-11-19, 05:19: > >This is a tra

Re: Bug#652575: rsyslog: /etc/init.d/rsyslog modifications for GNU/Hurd

Hi! On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 14:11:41 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 27.01.2012 10:18, Guillem Jover wrote: > >> * rsyslog should probably switch to use s-s-d --exec instead (why is > >>it using --name anyway? that option has always been more unreliable). > > &g

Bug#668705: libbsd: Tracking upload of prospective 0.4.0 release

Source: libbsd Version: 0.3.0-2 Severity: wishlist Hi! This is just a bug to track the upload of the yet to be released libbsd 0.4.0. I've it almost ready but I wanted to test build Build-Dependencies to check if everything was fine due to some header cleanup included in that release, and there's

Bug#669604: kbdcontrol can't load any keymap

On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 23:28:29 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > tag 669604 unreproducible moreinfo > thanks > 2012/4/20 Robert Millan : > > El 20 d’abril de 2012 13:34, Anton Zinoviev ha escrit: > >> # kbdcontrol -l any_file.kbd > >> kbdcontrol: setting keymap: Inappropriate ioctl for device > > > >

Re: Bug#674260: RM: aspectc++ [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64] -- ROM; FTBFS on kfreebsd

On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 08:12:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > The package aspectc++ does not build on kfreebsd since April now. The > reason for this is, as I suspect, a bug or insufficienty in the fnctl() > implementation on kfreebsd. In order to spe

Re: Bug#677227: screen: Workaround for #644788 fails to detect a running screen on kfreebsd / process renaming does not work on kfreebsd

On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 14:34:16 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 12/06/12 14:23, Axel Beckert wrote: > > But on kfreebsd this process renaming don't seem to work. This doesn't > > seem to be a screen issue but a general kfreebsd issue as the following > > works as expected on Linux, but not on

Re: freebsd-utils_9.0+ds1-6_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 12:33:32 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Was that a mistake, or is there going to be an upload of that too? In > the latter case, an urgency=low upload of freebsd-glue would now need a > freeze unblock. I don't see why, the freeze is supposed to let any package in sid at

Bug#678136: zfsutils: FTBFS with libbsd-dev >= 0.4.0

On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 21:40:39 +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > tag 678136 + pending > thanks > On 21.06.2012 21:18, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > Actually you're right, it's fine now in up-to-date sid chroot. > > cool, thanks. I'll wait a bit for Robert or someone else to comment on > the patch. Otherw

Re: cuse4bsd

Hi! On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:47:49 -0700, Christoph Egger wrote: > Also would it be a good idea to keept this in kfreebsd-maintainers > team svn or something? Yeah, I think that would be a good idea if you feel like putting it there. You should have commit access now. ;) thanks, guillem -- To

Re: RFC: drop __GLIBC__ on gcc/kbsd

Hi! On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 13:05:02 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > years ago, when Robert Millan improved the support for k*bsd* in gcc, he > added the __GLIBC__ define as part of the ones provided by gcc itself > (see [1][2]). > Unfortunately, __GLIBC__ is one of the defines provided by glibc itse

Re: Bug#692992: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*

Control: tags -1 patch Hi! On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 21:01:16 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: src:rsyslog > Version: 7.2.1-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > the current version of rsyslog from experimental (7.2.1) FTBFS on > kfreebsd-*. > It wou

Re: Bug#692992: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*

On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:03:20 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 12.11.2012 03:24, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 21:01:16 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > The imptcp module seems like has never been available in anything > > non-Linux, so I've restricted i

Re: elfutils FTBFS

On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 14:12:18 -0800, Christoph Egger wrote: > Can anyone look at elfutils? it hasn't successfully built on kfreebsd > for 2 years (and was always "fixed" by a binary upload) > > #debian-hurd: > > christoph: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662041#17 and #68

Re: Providing strl/strl.h in libbsd

Hi! On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 21:14:05 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I'm one of the maintainers of opendkim. The upstream developer is a > BSD user and opendkim makes use of strlcpy and strlcat and he has, up > to now, provided an embedded copy of these functions for non-BSD > platforms. > > In op

Bug#665997: closed by Guillem Jover (Bug#665997: fixed in libbsd 0.4.0-1)

#665997: libbsd uses wrong compiler when cross-building > > > > It has been closed by Guillem Jover . > [...] > > - Autoconfiscated, supports cross-building natively. (Closes: #665997) > > This is nearly there, but not quite. You're not passing the required > --

Re: Providing strl/strl.h in libbsd

On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 12:32:04 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, November 23, 2012 01:25:56 AM Guillem Jover wrote: > > I've just checked to see where this strl.h is coming from, and it > > appears to be a compat library of its own, and TBH I don't see the > &

Re: Re: Bug#675845: adanaxisgpl: FTBFS:

Hi! On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 03:26:49 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Control: found -1 1.2.5.dfsg.1-4.1 > Control: tags -1 + patch > The problem is a '#define off_t long', which causes a problem later when > GNU/kFreeBSD headers include (again), and try to redefine > off_t for some reason. > >

Bogus F_SETFL usage with FD_CLOEXEC (was Re: Bug#679198: ...)

On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 22:51:11 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Using Debian Code Search we can see other cases where possibly the same > mistake has been made - I wonder if any of these would cause bugs: > > http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=fcntl.*F_SETFL.*FD_ Ah, nice thinking. All these

Re: Bogus F_SETFL usage with FD_CLOEXEC

On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 13:05:28 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 22:51:11 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > Using Debian Code Search we can see other cases where possibly the same > > mistake has been made - I wonder if any of these would cause bugs

Re: freebsd-i386 status update

Hi, On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 10:47:45AM -0400, Nathan Hawkins wrote: > Missing essential packages: > bsdutils, e2fsprogs, login, mount, and util-linux. For util-linux and bsdutils you can try the patch in #153410, it's for the Hurd, but I think it's generic enough to work on BSDs. regards, guille

Re: freebsd-i386 base packages update

FreeBSD > without problem as it's using glibc. The patch is in bug #153410, but I > think Guillem Jover has made a newer one, I'm CCing him. I'm sorry, have been a little busy. I will install a Debian GNU/FreeBSD this week to test and port it. LaMont do you want me to talk wit

Re: util-linux on freebsd-i386

Hi Nathan, On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:48:58AM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote: > I now have a patch for util-linux on freebsd-i386. It is definitely not > finished and ready to merge. There are some things that need work still, > but I'd like to find out what it needs for netbsd before continuing.

Re: util-linux on freebsd-i386

[Sorry for the delay] Hi, On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:20:41AM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote: > Guillem Jover wrote: > >Ok, as the Hurd needs a considerable amount of changes to the upstream > >src, and the upstream releases often (currently on 2.11x), I don't think >

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

Hi Joel, On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:50:16PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: > I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the > general opinion seems to be that "Debian GNU/KNetBSD" is a better name for > the port than "Debian GNU/NetBSD", both because it is more specific about

Implemented architecure aliases (Was Re: RFC: patch to split System/Cpu in dpkg)

Hi, On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 04:50:26AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > Please have a look at this patch I just sent to dpkg maintainers: > > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/patches/dpkg.diff > > This should address all the concerns porters have had with limitations in dpkg > architecture handling

GNUAB archive gpg key

Hi, With the introduction of the new apt-get, I've added support for signed Release files to mini-dak, the key can be found on: The key is: pub 1024D/359AAB34 2005-07-02 [expires: 2006-01-01] 0B3E 7BC4 408E F096 3602 9825 5580 6D41 35

Re: Bug#338378: kfreebsd-5: please enable altq support

On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:31:07PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Robert Millan a écrit : > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:46:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Fixed in SVN. I plan to release new kernel image this week-end, I am not > > > sure though if I'll upload them directly or if I will as

New GNUAB Archive key

Hi, The GNUAB Archive key expired some days ago. I've created a new one, uploaded it to the keyservers, and it's the one that will start to be used for new signatures. The key is: pub 1024D/CD02E583 2006-01-06 [expires: 2007-01-31] Key fingerprint = FBA8 1337 C506 565B 8E10 7B00 F621 FF

Re: No Mouse in X and kbdcontrol package

Hi, On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:34:16PM -0700, Christopher Desjardins wrote: > Also, the kbdcontrol package will not install because it depends on keymaps. > Thanks and so far I'm quite impressed with the port! > Chris I've the sources for kbdcontrol around I'll put them in svn, merge into a singl

r1188 - trunk/libbsd

e/stdlib.h: Added fmtcheck declaration. + * Versions: Added fmtcheck. + 2005-11-01 Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * ip_icmp.h: Move to ... @@ -37,14 +40,14 @@ 2005-08-03 Hector Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - * Makefile: Fixed to place soft

r1189 - trunk/libbsd/debian

Author: guillem Date: 2006-02-14 05:18:05 + (Tue, 14 Feb 2006) New Revision: 1189 Modified: trunk/libbsd/debian/README.Debian trunk/libbsd/debian/copyright Log: Do not list all functions in the README. Beautify copyright file. Modified: trunk/libbsd/debian/README.Debian ===

r1190 - trunk/libbsd

/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 05:18:05 UTC (rev 1189) +++ trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 05:22:15 UTC (rev 1190) @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2006-02-14 Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * Versions: Remove optreset. + 2006-02-13 Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * bsd_getopt

r1191 - trunk/libbsd

/libbsd/ChangeLog === --- trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 05:22:15 UTC (rev 1190) +++ trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 05:26:48 UTC (rev 1191) @@ -1,5 +1,11 @@ 2006-02-14 Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + * Ma

r1192 - trunk/libbsd

Author: guillem Date: 2006-02-14 05:33:38 + (Tue, 14 Feb 2006) New Revision: 1192 Modified: trunk/libbsd/Makefile Log: Add missing %. Modified: trunk/libbsd/Makefile === --- trunk/libbsd/Makefile 2006-02-14 05:26:48 UTC

r1193 - in trunk/libbsd: . src

=== --- trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 05:33:38 UTC (rev 1192) +++ trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 05:39:29 UTC (rev 1193) @@ -1,5 +1,29 @@ 2006-02-14 Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + * arc4random.c: Move to ... + * src/arc4random.c: ... here. + * bsd_getopt.c

r1194 - in trunk/libbsd: . include/bsd

=== --- trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 05:39:29 UTC (rev 1193) +++ trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 06:43:04 UTC (rev 1194) @@ -1,5 +1,13 @@ 2006-02-14 Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + * include/bsd

r1195 - in trunk/libbsd: . include/bsd

=== --- trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 06:43:04 UTC (rev 1194) +++ trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 06:45:41 UTC (rev 1195) @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ 2006-02-14 Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + * include/bsd/bsd.h: Remove commented out macros. + +2006-02-14 Guillem Jover &

r1196 - trunk/libbsd

2006-02-14 06:45:41 UTC (rev 1195) +++ trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 06:55:53 UTC (rev 1196) @@ -40,10 +40,6 @@ (LIB_INCLUDES): List only the files, automatically prefix the dir. (LIB_MANS): Likewise. -2006-02-14 Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - - * Ve

r1197 - in trunk/libbsd: . include/bsd

=== --- trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 06:55:53 UTC (rev 1196) +++ trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-14 07:01:21 UTC (rev 1197) @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ 2006-02-14 Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + * include/bsd/stdlib.h: Remov

r1207 - in trunk/libbsd: . include/bsd

=== --- trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-15 18:20:05 UTC (rev 1206) +++ trunk/libbsd/ChangeLog 2006-02-15 20:41:06 UTC (rev 1207) @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2006-02-15 Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * include/bsd/cdefs.h: Disable __unus

r1209 - trunk/libfreebsd

Author: guillem Date: 2006-02-15 21:04:09 + (Wed, 15 Feb 2006) New Revision: 1209 Removed: trunk/libfreebsd/libfreebsd-dev.install Log: Remove crufty file. Deleted: trunk/libfreebsd/libfreebsd-dev.install === --- trunk/libfre

Re: glibc on kfreebsd-amd64 (was: Re: segfaults on amd64, one more update)

On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:13:37PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 07:59:21PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > > one more update, please could you test > > with sysdeps/x86_64/elf/start.S from previous mail > > and enclosed sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h > > > > iff it works, I w

Re: packages in kfreebsd-i386 archive

Hi, On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 10:29:10 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > I have some notes about our kfreebsd-i386 archive. > > Currently there is 525 source packages in unreleased, > but 226 of them are superseded by newer fixed version in unstable. > Could be possible to delete/obsolete them ? > > In

Re: http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu

On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 10:57:14 +0200, Dr. Markus Waldeck wrote: > please correct the link to the mailing list on > http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu. > > There is still http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/glibc-bsd-devel > mentioned! Thanks, fixed. regards, guillem -- To U

Re: kfreebsd future

On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 20:45:45 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > > For libxul-dev, http://glibc-bsd.alioth.debian.org/patches/nsprpub.diff > > is a good stard. > > xulrunner.diff is now available on alioth. > BTW, how is http://glibc-bsd.alioth.debian.org/ synced vith web subdir in > subversion ? It

Re: kdenetwork, patch need revision or filing?

inux-any is currently only in dpkg :-( > The "WARNING: please note that this functionality is still not supported > by debhelper" is still valid, debhelper has support for few months now: debhelper (5.0.36) unstable; urgency=low [...] * Patch from Guillem Jover to make --s

Re: Network trouble

On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 22:50:49 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > It looks like the problem comes from inetutils-tools. It provides the > package net-tools, but does not have the same capabilities. I think we > should add a conflict on it. Hmm it has provided that for a long time but it should not hav

Re: extraneous packages in kfreebsd-i386 archive (was Re: (wishlist) Re: edos.debian.net)

On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 13:26:38 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > There are many failures due to packages currently arch all, > which have been formerly any. > > Could be they just deleted from kfreebsd-i386 unstable archive ? > List with 116 source packages enclosed. > > The similar deletion should b

New GNUAB archive signing key (2007)

Hi, The GNUAB archive key expired some days ago. I've created a new one, uploaded it to the keyservers, and it's the one that will start to be used for new signatures. The key is: pub 1024D/19BFB8AB 2007-02-07 [expires: 2008-01-30] Key fingerprint = 0C8F 3CAD C3B1 13F9 CA77 51E5 4590 A3

Re: extraneous packages in kfreebsd-i386/kfreebsd-amd64 archives

Hi, On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 14:23:03 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > this time I checked both kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 archives. > Please, could be again these source packages simply removed > from kfreebsd archives. > This would also make results at http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/ > yet

Re: snapshot(s) of kfreebsd archive(s)

Hi, Sorry for the delay... On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 13:24:27 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote: > Please, would be possible to create > weekly snapshot(s) of kfreebsd archive(s) ? I've done one for now, and new ones should appear once a week on thursdays. They are at

Re: kFreeBSD is "fantastic"

On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 00:34:44 -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > I feel the real concerns for kfreebsd porters are in getting patches > accepted, and having some additional resources. For now this may be > accomplished outside the Debian resources, but official recognition might > make things more

Re: Bug#419081: www.debian.org: Terminology issue: GNU/NetBSD

Hi, Thanks for taking the time for this! On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 18:42:45 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: important > Tags: patch > [(X-Debbugs-)CCing the porters' list] >· > The Debian GNU/kNetBSD port is referred incorrectly as "GNU/NetBSD". > I assume this mist

Re: Debian GNU/kFreeBSD description

On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:08:43 -0600, Warren Turkal wrote: > The description for the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD description at [1] needs to be > updated. It currently says that they expect to meet the requirements for > release in sarge+1, but clearly GNU/kFreeBSD was not released with Etch. Where's [1

Re: Debian GNU/kFreeBSD description

On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 21:55:35 -0600, Warren Turkal wrote: > On Sunday 20 May 2007 17:22, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:08:43 -0600, Warren Turkal wrote: > > > The description for the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD description at [1] needs to > > > be updated.

Bug#359002: freebsd-sendpr: includes 2 copies of the same executable

On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 15:03:49 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Package: freebsd-sendpr > Version: 3.113+5.3-6 > Severity: minor > > $ diff `dpkg -L freebsd-sendpr |grep bin/`; echo $? > 0 > > One of the two should probably be a symlink; also, the manpage is > confusing, in that it only mentions sen

Reestructuration of armel and kfreebsd-any repos at GNUAB

Hi, The kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64 and armel repos at GNUAB now carry the pure arch:all packages mirrored from the main archive. The previously needed sources.list deb line hack[0] is not anymore. This will also make it easier to work on D-I and stop bothering users about unathenticated package

Re: x264 has patent issues but it's still present in the archive

Hi, On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 00:23:11 +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > = > [Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 17:07:46 +] [ftpmaster: Joerg Jaspert] > Removed the following packages from unstable: > > libx264-54 | 0.svn20070309-4 | $ALLARCHS > libx264-dev | 0.svn20070309-4 | $ALLARCHS > x264 | 0.svn2

Bug#477587: Bug#477588: kfreebsd-7: bashism in debian/rules

severity 477587 wishlist retitle 477587 kfreebsd-6: Please switch debian/rules to SHELL=sh severity 477588 wishlist retitle 477588 kfreebsd-7: Please switch debian/rules to SHELL=sh thanks Hi, On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 19:48:55 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Source: kfreebsd-7 > Severity: important

Re: [libbsd package] licenc e on NetBSD® files

Hi, On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 21:50:37 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > while they still haven’t brought out an official announcement, this seems > to be better than noting: > │ http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2008/04/30/msg005553.html > > I also had private replies from Martin Husemann an

Bug#485249: setting package to freebsd-sendpr, tagging 485249

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30 # via tagpending # # freebsd-sendpr (3.113+5.3-9) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * Switch all patches from -p0 to -pab. (Closes: #485249) # package freebsd-sendpr tags 485249 + pending -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Bug#485358: setting package to posixtestsuite, tagging 485358

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30 # via tagpending # # posixtestsuite (1.5.2-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * Refresh patches with -pab. (Closes: #485358) package posixtestsuite tags 485358 + pending -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Re: libbsd package

Hi, On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 13:08:53 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dixi: > > >Any progress on the libbsd package, now that licence issues are out > >of the way? IIRC, plans were to get it ready for all arches in lenny? It took a bit more time than expected, but it's already there, as you've alre

Re: libbsd package

Hi Florian, On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 17:28:30 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Thorsten Glaser: > > Any progress on the libbsd package, now that licence issues are out > > of the way? IIRC, plans were to get it ready for all arches in lenny? > > We need a thread-safe version of something like arc4ra

Re: devname in glibc-bsd

Hi! [ Replying on debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, and BCCing glibc-bsd-devel as this latter is defunct and mostly no one is subscribed there anymore. Please use the former from now on, thanks. ] On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 11:52:40 +0200, Resul Cetin wrote: > I have an application which needs to call

Re: libbsd

Hi! On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 09:25:42 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > jief1.l dixit: > > but getline store the allocated size in len, not the line length as it > > should. I've fixed this now in libbsd, and done a new release. Will be preparing an updated package for Debian now. > Your correction i

Bug#530450: libelfg0-dev and libbsd-dev: error when trying to install together

reassign 530450 libbsd-dev thanks On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 00:34:24 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Package: libbsd-dev,libelfg0-dev > Version: libbsd-dev/0.1.1-1 > Version: libelfg0-dev/0.8.10-2 > Severity: serious > User: trei...@debian.org > Usertags: edos-file-overwrite > > Date: 2009-05-24 > Archi

Re: GNU/kFreeBSD packages in the Debian archive

Hi! On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 14:21:09 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > As a consequence, on GNU/Linux the temporary directory has lost the > setgid bit, and is still uid=buildd, gid=sbuild. Files are unpacked with > uid=buildd and gid=buildd, given that the temporary directory has lost > the setgid bit

Re: Port insserv to kfreebsd?

Hi! [ Redirecting to debian-bsd as glibc-bsd-devel is not used anymore, and reinclucing the whole initial mail in quotes for context. ] On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 13:27:50 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Petter Reinholdtsen] > > Hi. I notice that the latest insserv package fail to build on > >

Re: Port insserv to kfreebsd?

Hi! On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 09:01:11 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > Somewhen Guillem Jover wrote: > > You should also probably return ENOSYS instead. > > Well, to be 100% correct, errno should be set to ENOSYS and return -1. > The eventually implemented posix_fadvise() could only

Re: Processed: libedit2: reassign 535519 358164 libbsd0

merge 358164 535519 reassign 358164 libedit2 close 358164 2.11-20080614-1 thanks On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 07:03:04 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > reassign 535519 libbsd0 > Bug#535519: libedit2: huge memory leak in fgetln emulation > Bug

Bug#274747: dependency on dpkg-dev is not required for provides

Hi! On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 10:54:07 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 08:43:16PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Package: type-handling > > Version: 0.2.23 > > Severity: normal > > > > This issue has just become somewhat more commonplace: > > gnome-desktop-environment now uses

Re: devd now running on my box

Hi! On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 15:21:59 +0100, Werner Koch wrote: > I worked on devd and now I am able run the rc.suspend and rc.resume > scripts on my X31. To make that really useful I also ported acpiconf. Ah great! > I added new functions pidfile_* to libbsd and would like to know how > to procee

Re: How to find number of processors?

Hi! On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 21:28:33 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 02:08:07PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > The code in question is: > > > > unsigned thread::hardware_concurrency() > > { > > #if defined(PTW32_VERSION) || defined(__hpux) > > return pthrea

Re: Request for advise with struct stat, ACL, xattr, zlib (2nd try)

Hi! On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 19:46:36 +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > None of the optional libraries and system > features is used in the buildd compile runs: > - libacl > - support for Extended Attributes > - zlib > > At least on Linux this astonishes me. I'll have > to ask George for exploring the

Re: [patch] pidfile_open (was: devd now running on my box)

Hi! On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 17:59:23 +0100, Werner Koch wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:09:19 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I was in the process to release a new upstream release for libbsd, and > > can include those functions. I'll then proceed with an upload to > >

  1   2   3   >