On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:07:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> El 5 de març de 2012 21:51, Robert Millan ha escrit:
> > 1- Add libstdc++6-udeb package (needed by devd).
> Oh, I wasn't aware that libstdc++ udeb had already been proposed, and
> it seems to be a controversial topic...
Reducing lib
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 05:37:35PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 17:27, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Reducing libstdc++ with mklibs is tricky, so only the unreduced lib can
> > be included into the boot image. C++ is controversial, because the
> > out
Package: kfreebsd-7
Version: 7.0~cvs20080107-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kfreebsd-7_7.0~cvs20080107-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by
> sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
> # We have nothing to do
>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid;
> Bastian, do you object?
Well, there is a 1.15.1 already as stable.
Bastian
--
I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth.
-- Ki
Package: kfreebsd-8
Version: 8.0-1
Severity: serious
The licensing information in the copyright file of the kfreebsd-8
package are incomplete and missleading. It refers to
/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD, which is a 3-clause license. Also it
lists licenses of sources that are not actually included
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 08:47:54AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> There has been discussions about the use of mlock(all) and we have
> over the past year not been able to reach a consensus. I don't
> feel comfortable making the descision to rip out security features
> on my own as proposed by p
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:19:52AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 14/08/14 18:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > [...] If a
> > single extra udeb (or udeb size increase, which happens from time to
> > time) is going to break kfreebsd-*, it seems to me that their status
> > is far too brittle.
>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:37:25AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Since there are still some repositories that we need for debian-ports
> in the attic, I was wondering whether we should take care of the
> attic stuff and move it over to salsa or github.
Could you show a list? Just migr
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:20:24PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 05:54:34PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Absolutely. And the sysvinit boot system have lots of unsolved problems
> > we never got around to figuring out, related to disk and other device
> > setup. Th
9 matches
Mail list logo
