On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> A minority? Yes. But a sizable one.
It doesn't matter how many people use it, if noone is willing to maintain
it. *If* people are maintaining it, it also doesnt matter how many people
are using it :)
*Someone* needs to do the
Holger Levsen - 19.10.18, 12:02:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > A minority? Yes. But a sizable one.
>
> It doesn't matter how many people use it, if noone is willing to
> maintain it. *If* people are maintaining it, it also doesnt matter
> how many people
Bastian Blank - 19.10.18, 12:25:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > So Devuan almost doubles the percentage of sysvinit-core
> > installations.
> Devuan is _not_ Debian. They forked it, with the full knowledge that
> they might have to do all the work to sup
On Wed 17/Oct/2018 23:06:24 +0200 Russ Allbery wrote:
>> You say "more than adequate". I don't particularly see it as providing a
>> solid system as you don't get restart on failure. Now I can see how
>> people say that this is not a problem as daemons should not crash in the
>> first place. Maybe
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:30 PM Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> As long as people choose to strip of dependencies to libsystemd from
> packages like util-linux, avoiding a fork would not work with how Debian
> and Debian based distributions are built.
It might be feasible to introduce nosystemd build
5 matches
Mail list logo
