Re: About structure sk_buff

2016-06-06 Thread Corcodel Marian
On 06.06.2016 12:59, Corcodel Marian wrote: Hi Why sk_buff have memory allocated on hardware drivers on majority nic drivers? This is wrong on rx mode look like: struct sk_buff *skb; struct device *d = &tp->pci_dev->dev; data = rtl8169_align(data); dma_sync_single_for_cpu(

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-06 Thread John David Anglin
On 2016-06-05 8:56 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >I have invested lots of time and effort to get sparc64 into a usable state in Debian. >We are close to 11.000 installed packages. Missing packages include Firefox, >Thunderbird/Icedove, golang and LibreOffice to

Re: About structure sk_buff

2016-06-06 Thread Grant Grundler
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Corcodel Marian wrote: > > > On 06.06.2016 12:59, Corcodel Marian wrote: > >> Hi >> Why sk_buff have memory allocated on hardware drivers on majority nic >> drivers? >> > This seems like an appropriate question for netdev mailing list: http://vger.kernel.org/