Hi,
DAVID Henderson wrote:
> There is something wrong regarding the kfreebsd-i386 eject command .
Looking at https://packages.debian.org/sid/eject i see
a common source tarball for Linux and kFreeBSD
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/eject/eject_2.1.5+deb1+cvs20081104.orig.tar.gz
File
Hi Christoph,
On 20/10/14 23:57, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully
> to ftp-master.debian.org
> along with the files:
> kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Any ideas why this hasn't reached incoming.d.o or star
Steven Chamberlain (2014-10-21):
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 20/10/14 23:57, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> > kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully
> > to ftp-master.debian.org
> > along with the files:
> > kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
>
> An
freebsd-libs_10.1~svn273304-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
libusbhid-common_10.1~svn273304-1_all.deb
freebsd-libs_10.1~svn273304-1.dsc
freebsd-libs_10.1~svn273304.orig.tar.gz
freebsd-libs_10.1~svn273304-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetin
freebsd-libs_10.1~svn273304-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
libusbhid-common_10.1~svn273304-1_all.deb
freebsd-libs_10.1~svn273304-1.dsc
freebsd-libs_10.1~svn273304.orig.tar.gz
freebsd-libs_10.1~svn273304-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5_source.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5.dsc
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5.dsc
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:36:01 +
Source: freebsd-libs
Binary: libsbuf6 libsbuf6-udeb libsbuf-dev libdwarf-freebsd-3
libdwarf-freebsd-dev libelf-freebsd-1 libelf-freebsd-dev libutil-freebsd-9
libutil-freebsd-dev libcam6
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 01:33:11 +0100
Source: kfreebsd-kernel-headers
Binary: kfreebsd-kernel-headers
Architecture: source
Version: 10.1~5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers
Changed-B
freebsd-utils_10.1~svn273304-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
freebsd-utils_10.1~svn273304-1.dsc
freebsd-utils_10.1~svn273304.orig.tar.gz
freebsd-utils_10.1~svn273304-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running o
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:21:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#764956: fixed in freebsd-libs 10.1~svn273304-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #764956,
regarding freebsd-libs: FTBFS - MK_TESTS can't be set by a user
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:21:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#764956: fixed in freebsd-libs 10.1~svn273304-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #764956,
regarding freebsd-libs: FTBFS: MK_TESTS can't be set by a user
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5_source.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5.dsc
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On 21/10/14 07:50, DAVID Henderson wrote:
> There is something wrong regarding the kfreebsd-i386 eject command .
> Either eject isn't supposed to work and I should be using something
> else, or there is a bug in the eject executable thats sending the wrong
> ioctl to the Freebsd kernel.
Yes that i
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:23:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#764897: fixed in kfreebsd-kernel-headers 10.1~5
has caused the Debian Bug report #764897,
regarding kfreebsd-kernel-headers: net/route.h fails to compile in userland,
nmap FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This mea
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5.dsc
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:23:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#764897: fixed in kfreebsd-kernel-headers 10.1~5
has caused the Debian Bug report #764897,
regarding nmap: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: asm/types.h: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
freebsd-utils_10.1~svn273304-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
freebsd-utils_10.1~svn273304-1.dsc
freebsd-utils_10.1~svn273304.orig.tar.gz
freebsd-utils_10.1~svn273304-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck
On 21/10/14 07:50, DAVID Henderson wrote:
> There is something wrong regarding the kfreebsd-i386 eject command
You could perhaps try to do this with camcontrol (from freebsd-utils, so
you should already have it) :
# camcontrol eject cd0
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 22:18:48 +0100
Source: freebsd-utils
Binary: freebsd-utils freebsd-utils-udeb kldutils kldutils-udeb kbdcontrol
kbdcontrol-udeb vidcontrol freebsd-net-tools freebsd-net-tools-udeb
freebsd-nfs-server f
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:34:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#763706: fixed in freebsd-utils 10.1~svn273304-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #763706,
regarding kfreebsd-10: kern.ipc.shmall default too low for Qt apps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Signature for changes file was already seen at 2014-10-21 10:23:21.258408.
Please refresh the signature of the changes file if you want to upload it again.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which addres
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:34:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#761418: fixed in freebsd-utils 10.1~svn273304-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #761418,
regarding freebsd-net-tools: netstat issues on 9.0 kernel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
acpi-modules-9.2-1-486-di | 9.2-2 | kfreebsd-i386
acpi-modules-9.2-1-amd64-di | 9.2-2 | kfreebsd-amd64
cdrom-modules-9.2-1-486-di | 9.2-2 | kfreebsd-i386
cdrom-modules-9.2-1-
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #531167,
regarding Cannot boot with Xircom PCMCIA CardBus Ethernet adapter plugged in
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #630783,
regarding kfreebsd-9: lock order reversal (bufwait vs dirhash) in ufs_direnter
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #623217,
regarding Debian d-i daily build for kfreebsd panics on boot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #652448,
regarding panic when booting on a machine with >= 4 GiB of RAM
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #651624,
regarding sometimes device nodes disappear after a reboot, making
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #652469,
regarding PAE support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #658639,
regarding kfreebsd-9: 'write' system call violates POSIX standard
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
reassign 740509 glibc
found 740509 glibc/2.19-11
affects 740509 + freebsd-net-tools
tags 740509 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On 21/10/14 03:00, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> The attached patch uses rt_msghdr->ifm_msglen to guess the
> running kernel version and accordingly, find the right place for the
> str
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #666729,
regarding in ia32 compat mode, ktimer_create etc return ENOSYS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #675768,
regarding kfreebsd: mkdir(2) sets errno to EISDIR
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #684072,
regarding CVE-2011-2393
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #691674,
regarding kfreebsd-image-9-amd64: Please include virtio-kmod module
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #692080,
regarding kfreebsd-amd64 fails on LSI Logic SAS1068E Fusion-MPT SAS controller
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #700742,
regarding Poor VirtualBox hardware support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #691798,
regarding building source package on !kfreebsd drops udebs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #677707,
regarding missing mremap() implementation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #702943,
regarding Debian GNU/kFreeBSD bind() truncates too long Unix domain socket
pathname
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #706490,
regarding kfreebsd-9: building with clang-3.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #708451,
regarding kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64: fails to boot from ZFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #705126,
regarding kfreebsd-9: maxproc limit exceeded, caused by sshd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #710959,
regarding System intermittently hangs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #731182,
regarding xserver-xorg-video-intel: drm2 and i915kms kernel modules are not
loaded automatically
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #747983,
regarding kfreebsd-9: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.6)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #750364,
regarding kfreebsd-9: not planned for release with jessie
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #748078,
regarding kfreebsd-9: ciss(4) potential data corruption bug
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #730004,
regarding kfreebsd-image-9.2-1-686: "service stop wdm" crashes kernel
occasionally: "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #754236,
regarding kfreebsd-9: sockbuf CMSG kernel memory disclosure (CVE-2014-3952)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #754237,
regarding kfreebsd-9: SCTP kernel memory disclosures (CVE-2014-3953)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765606: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #750493,
regarding kfreebsd-9: CVE-2014-3873: ktrace kernel memory disclosure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 740509 glibc
Bug #740509 [freebsd-net-tools] ifconfig: ioctl(SIOCGIFINFO_IN6): No such
device or address
Bug #765882 [freebsd-net-tools] freebsd-net-tools: ifconfig ioctl siocaifaddr
Bug reassigned from package 'freebsd-net-tools' to 'gl
On 21/10/14 09:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain (2014-10-21):
>> Any ideas why this hasn't reached incoming.d.o or started building yet?
>
> It appears Christoph removed those files:
Oh, thank you. It was re-uploaded and has built now anyway...
Christoph, the Dep-Wait didn't qu
Hi,
I realise this may be too little, too late; but...
Whilst I don't currently run a Debian kfreebsd box I think that Debian
kfreebsd is a good thing; and I understand that it is in danger of not
being released as part of Jessie. So in an attempt to put my money where
my mouth is can I useful
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> On 21/10/14 09:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Steven Chamberlain (2014-10-21):
>>> Any ideas why this hasn't reached incoming.d.o or started building yet?
>>
>> It appears Christoph removed those files:
>
> Oh, thank you. It was re-uploaded and has built now any
Christoph Egger wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
> > Please could you update the buildd chroots and then give back nmap,
> > squid3, ipsec-tools again?
>
> Done that now with extra depends maybe set correctly. Seems it's not yet
> on the buildd's proper mirrors for a chroot upgrade.
Didn't wo
Package: plptools
Version: 1.0.13-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
plptools FTBFS on kfreebsd; ENOMEDIUM is not a part of POSIX and we
don't have it.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=plptools&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1.0.13-0
Package: eject
Version: 2.1.5+deb1+cvs20081104-13
Severity: grave
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: gift
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, dghkd...@gmail.com
Hi,
I'm creating an actual bug ticket for this issue, reported at:
h
Hello,
On 21/10/14 14:55, Jonathan David Amery wrote:
> Whilst I don't currently run a Debian kfreebsd box I think that Debian
> kfreebsd is a good thing; and I understand that it is in danger of not
> being released as part of Jessie. So in an attempt to put my money where
> my mouth is can I us
Hi,
I am interested in submitting Debian packages for:
Lutok ( https://github.com/jmmv/lutok )
ATF ( https://github.com/jmmv/atf )
Kyua ( https://github.com/jmmv/kyua )
These packages are used to make up the testing framework for FreeBSD.
At the end of this ITP:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Package: src:kfreebsd-9
Version: 9.0-10+deb70.7
Severity: important
Tags: security patch upstream
Hi,
kfreebsd 9.0 (not officially supported upstream) seems vulnerable to the
same issue described in 9.1 and later:
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-14:22.namei.asc
I doubt any Debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 766275 + pending
Bug #766275 [src:kfreebsd-9] kfreebsd-9: CVE-2014-3711: memory leak in
sandboxed namei lookup
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
766275: http://bugs.debian
tags 765288 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On 13/10/14 23:15, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> hubicfuse failed to build on kfreebsd-* with:
> | gcc -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security
> -I/usr/include/libxml2 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/fuse
> -I/usr/include/json-c -
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 766275 -1 -2
Bug #766275 [src:kfreebsd-9] kfreebsd-9: CVE-2014-3711: memory leak in
sandboxed namei lookup
Bug 766275 cloned as bugs 766278-766279
> retitle -1 kfreebsd-10: CVE-2014-3711: memory leak in sandboxed namei lookup
Bug #766278 [s
Hi,
Please give back dragonegg to build on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386
The last build attempt with llvm-3.5-dev 1:3.5~svn201651-1 failed with:
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/include/dragonegg/Internals.h:30:40: fatal error:
> llvm/Analysis/TargetFolder.h: No such file or directory
https://buildd.debian.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear FTP master,
Please remove kfreebsd-downloader, which has been replaced in sid/jessie
by kfreebsd-downloader-10.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Source-Version: 20141002
I believe this was fixed along with #759686.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # re-assigning back, now these are ready for newer freebsd-mk
> reassign 765149 src:freebsd-libs
Bug #765149 {Done: Steven Chamberlain } [freebsd-mk]
freebsd-libs: FTBFS: MK_TESTS can't be set by a user
Bug #764956 {Done: Steven Chamberlain } [fr
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> > Please could you update the buildd chroots and then give back nmap,
>> > squid3, ipsec-tools again?
>>
>> Done that now with extra depends maybe set correctly. Seems it's not yet
>> on the buildd's proper mirr
Hi!
On 22/10/14 00:22, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Maybe. giving it another try with hopefully fixed syntax. If that fails
> I'll just update the chroots as soon as possible / hack the update
It looks like it was already done? Those packages are all built now...
I assumed you'd done this.
Regards,
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Please give back dragonegg to build on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386
>
> The last build attempt with llvm-3.5-dev 1:3.5~svn201651-1 failed with:
>
>> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/include/dragonegg/Internals.h:30:40: fatal error:
>> llvm/Analysis/TargetFolder.h: No such file
Hi,
Please give back mutextrace to build on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386
When I tried locally on wheezy kfreebsd-amd64 it built fine. The last
build attempt was nearly 2 years ago so it seems worth a try.
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Descript
On 22/10/14 00:29, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Done, let's see
Yep :) Built on kfreebsd-*. Thanks.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> On 22/10/14 00:22, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Maybe. giving it another try with hopefully fixed syntax. If that fails
>> I'll just update the chroots as soon as possible / hack the update
>
> It looks like it was already done? Those packages are all built now...
> I as
76 matches
Mail list logo
