Steven Chamberlain (2014-05-21):
> On 22/01/13 06:06, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > debian-installer-utils (1.92+deb7u1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
> > .
> >* Fix procfs mounting on GNU/kFreeBSD: it's called linprocfs, rather
> > than procfs (Closes: #696901). Thanks,
Hello!
While preparing for the new upower 0.99 to go into unstable I'd like
to alert you guys about the below which comes from the announcement
at: lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2013-October/001519.html
[...]
> Support for non-Linux OSes
> --
>
> The new pol
Hi,
in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56274 Arnaud Charlet proposes to
remove the KFreeBSD Ada support upstream, unless somebody cares about the port.
Please can the Debian gnat maintainers or the Debian KFreeBSD porters forward
the KFreeBSD changes upstream? It currently builds in
On 22/05/14 11:38, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
[...]
>Support for non-Linux OSes
>--
>
>The new policy decision for low batteries is not implemented on the
>non-Linux systems that have backends in UPower, namely FreeBSD and
>OpenBSD. As legacy code in UPower used to do this
On 22/05/14 12:02, Matthias Klose wrote:
Hi,
in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56274 Arnaud Charlet proposes to
remove the KFreeBSD Ada support upstream, unless somebody cares about the port.
Please can the Debian gnat maintainers or the Debian KFreeBSD porters forward
the KFreeB
Control: tag 743141 wontfix
On 20/05/14 13:45, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
retitle 743141 kfreebsd-9: triple fault on execve from 64-bit thread to 32-bit
process
Tentatively tagging 743141 wontfix as kfreebsd-9 is planned for removal.
But, AFAIK, it can't be removed yet as latest D-I r
Processing control commands:
> tag 743141 wontfix
Bug #743141 [kfreebsd-9] kfreebsd-9: triple fault on execve from 64-bit thread
to 32-bit process
Added tag(s) wontfix.
--
743141: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743141
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi
Robert Millan (2014-05-22):
> Control: tag 743141 wontfix
>
> On 20/05/14 13:45, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >>retitle 743141 kfreebsd-9: triple fault on execve from 64-bit thread to
> >>32-bit process
>
> Tentatively tagging 743141 wontfix as kfreebsd-9 is planned for removal.
>
> But
Hello Robert Millan!
Not sure what you're saying... I have no clue about BSD.
Things seems to work fine on FreeBSD however Maybe you can
find something of value here (where they apparenty put the work
on packaging GNOME 3.12 for FreeBSD, including UPower 0.99.x):
http://www.marcuscom.com:8080
ufsutils_10.0-3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ufsutils_10.0-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
ufsutils-udeb_10.0-3_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
ufsutils_10.0-3.dsc
ufsutils_10.0-3.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck
On 22/05/14 17:20, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
make[6]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/freebsd'
CC libupshared_la-up-acpi-native.lo
CC libupshared_la-up-backend.lo
In file included from up-backend.c:27:0:
/usr/include/kvm.h:82:1: error: unknown type name 'uint64_t'
uint6
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 18:05:36 +0200
Source: ufsutils
Binary: ufsutils ufsutils-udeb
Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64
Version: 10.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers
Changed-By:
Your message dated Thu, 22 May 2014 16:34:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#748079: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #748079,
regarding kfreebsd-10: ciss(4) potential data corruption bug
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Thu, 22 May 2014 16:34:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#748744: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #748744,
regarding kfreebsd-10: triple fault on execve from 64-bit thread to 32-bit
process
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hello Robert Millan!
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 06:18:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Yes. This is a typical porting issue (uintXX_t types are defined by
> on FreeBSD,
> so their code often doesn't include ).
Thanks for this information... but again I'm not sure what you're saying.
We're talki
Hi!
This bug has a patch since 2009 (which you forwarded upstream). I
haven't seen a single new upstream release since then. Is there a chance
for a new release in the next 5 years? Alternatively, are you willing to
incorporate any of the patches proposed here into the package?
Thanks!
Chris
On 22/05/14 19:37, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 06:18:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>Yes. This is a typical porting issue (uintXX_t types are defined by
on FreeBSD,
>so their code often doesn't include ).
Thanks for this information... but again I'm not sure what you'r
freebsd-libs_10.0-6_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libsbuf6_10.0-6_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libsbuf6-udeb_10.0-6_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
libsbuf-dev_10.0-6_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libdwarf-freebsd-3_10.0-6_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libdwarf-freebsd-dev_10.0-6_kf
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 23:37:57 +0200
Source: freebsd-libs
Binary: libsbuf6 libsbuf6-udeb libsbuf-dev libdwarf-freebsd-3
libdwarf-freebsd-dev libelf-freebsd-1 libelf-freebsd-dev libutil-freebsd-9
libutil-freebsd-dev libcam6 l
19 matches
Mail list logo
