Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check

2014-02-19 Thread Robert Millan
On 29/01/2014 23:03, Niels Thykier wrote: > I believe this is a first for us (as well) - at the very least, I won't > claim to have all the answers. Anyhow, as I see it, we want you to > choose a set of supported packages, then we will probably ask how / why > you made that choice and, quite possi

Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check

2014-02-19 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Robert Millan (2014-02-19): > After some discussion we've reached the following position statement, which > has the approval of Steven, Petr and myself: > > ~~~ > It is with much regret that we observe that GDM has grown hard

Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check

2014-02-19 Thread brunomaximom
Em 2014-02-19 13:45, Cyril Brulebois escreveu: Robert Millan (2014-02-19): After some discussion we've reached the following position statement, which has the approval of Steven, Petr and myself: ~~~ It is with much regre

Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check

2014-02-19 Thread Robert Millan
On 19/02/2014 16:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Robert Millan (2014-02-19): >> After some discussion we've reached the following position statement, which >> has the approval of Steven, Petr and myself: >> >> ~~~ >> It is with m