Bug#737717: Please add securelevel(7).

2014-02-05 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Package: freebsd-manpages Version: 9.2+1-1 Severity: normal Please add the manual page securelevel(7) as it is an essential ingredient in any BSD system. We do not want users of kFreeBSD to be ignorant of those facts. Regards, Mats Erik Andersson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ..

Re: Please update buildd chroots, give back openjdk-7

2014-02-05 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi Christoph, On 01/02/14 22:57, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Please could the buildd chroots be updated to > kfreebsd-kernel-headers/9.2~7 (which is the latest in sid+jessie), [...] Please could you do the same on the kfreebsd-i386 buildds? Still have kfreebsd-kernel-headers/9.2~6 here on finzi:

Re: Please update buildd chroots, give back openjdk-7

2014-02-05 Thread Christoph Egger
Steven Chamberlain writes: > Hi Christoph, > > On 01/02/14 22:57, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> Please could the buildd chroots be updated to >> kfreebsd-kernel-headers/9.2~7 (which is the latest in sid+jessie), [...] > > Please could you do the same on the kfreebsd-i386 buildds? Still have > kfre

Re: Please update buildd chroots, give back openjdk-7

2014-02-05 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 05/02/14 13:30, Christoph Egger wrote: > OK. I did really run the upgrade but had the give-back already posted > while still upgrading finzi. might have been a race, let's see if it > works now That can't be, this was a new upload of openjdk-7 today... Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@py

Re: Please update buildd chroots, give back openjdk-7

2014-02-05 Thread Christoph Egger
Moin! Steven Chamberlain writes: > On 05/02/14 13:30, Christoph Egger wrote: >> OK. I did really run the upgrade but had the give-back already posted >> while still upgrading finzi. might have been a race, let's see if it >> works now > > That can't be, this was a new upload of openjdk-7 today...

Re: Call for testers: X with devd backend

2014-02-05 Thread Robert Millan
On 04/02/2014 22:50, Christoph Egger wrote: > [18.389] (II) config/devd: Adding input device Keyboard () > [18.389] (**) Keyboard: Applying InputClass "kbd catchall" > [18.389] (II) LoadModule: "kbd" > [18.389] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/kbd_drv.so > [18.390] (II)

Re: Call for testers: X with devd backend

2014-02-05 Thread Robert Millan
On 05/02/2014 15:39, Robert Millan wrote: > I'm not sure whose fault is this. The devd backend sends the same information > HAL did > (please can you verify you had the same problem with HAL?). Apparently X is > expected > to keep track of things and only unload the keyboard module when the last

Re: Call for testers: X with devd backend

2014-02-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 15:39:08 +, Robert Millan wrote: > > [ 158.904] (II) config/dev: removing device 0x1241 USB Keyboard > > [ 158.908] (II) UnloadModule: "kbd" > > Finally USB keyboard is unloaded, and X decides that kbd_drv must be unloaded > :-( > I'm pretty sure the driver is re

Bug#736716: Please raise package priority.

2014-02-05 Thread Axel Beckert
Control: retitle -1 freebsd-manpages: Should be installed by default on kfreebsd-any Control: severity -1 wishlist Hi Mats, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > This package has priority "optional", meaning it will not get > installed except by a manual intervention of the system operator, in > spite of

Processed: Re: Bug#736716: Please raise package priority.

2014-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 freebsd-manpages: Should be installed by default on kfreebsd-any Bug #736716 [freebsd-manpages] Please raise package priority. Changed Bug title to 'freebsd-manpages: Should be installed by default on kfreebsd-any' from 'Please raise package priority.' >

Bug#736720: Interrelation between this package and Linux manpages.

2014-02-05 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Mats, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > A standard installation of GNU/kFreeBSD, with a manual > addition of "freebsd-manpages", will result in a mixture > of Linux-only manpages, FreeBSD manpages, and glibc manpages. > A typical example is this: > > $ man -a -w socket > /usr/share/man/man2

Bug#736716: Please raise package priority.

2014-02-05 Thread Robert Millan
On 05/02/2014 20:50, Axel Beckert wrote: > Another possibility would be to make an arch:kfreebsd-any to depend on > (or maybe recommend) it, or make an arch:any package to depend on (or > maybe recommend) it only on kfreebsd-any. Sounds like a job for tasksel? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: FreeBSD 10 userland

2014-02-05 Thread Robert Millan
On 04/02/2014 22:07, Christoph Egger wrote: > % sudo sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf > sysctl: unknown oid '/etc/sysctl.conf': No such file or directory Seems like the script was buggy. So I just replaced it: freebsd-utils (10.0-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * Add 'sysctl -p' support. Replace /sbin/sy

Re: FreeBSD 10 userland

2014-02-05 Thread Robert Millan
On 04/02/2014 22:19, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > I notice a wheezy system has this wrapper, but /sbin/sysctl takes > precendence over it? They're both the same thing (symlinked). -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#735796: marked as done (freebsd-sendpr: FTBFS: make: freebsd-make: Command not found)

2014-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Feb 2014 21:36:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#736673: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #735796, regarding freebsd-sendpr: FTBFS: make: freebsd-make: Command not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#736673: Removed package(s) from unstable

2014-02-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: freebsd-sendpr | 3.113+9.2-1 | source, all --- Reason --- ROM; obsolete, RC-buggy -- Note that the package(s) h

Bug#736673: Removed package(s) from unstable

2014-02-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 3.113+9.2-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package freebsd-sendpr has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/73

freebsd-libs transition

2014-02-05 Thread Robert Millan
Unless I missed something, only two packages remain. And the maintainers haven't responded so far. What would be a suitable delay for delayed-queue NMUs? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#737568: Removed package(s) from unstable

2014-02-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: partman-zfs | 28 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, s390x, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; ANAIS; no longer built on linux-any ---

Re: Please update buildd chroots, give back openjdk-7

2014-02-05 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 05/02/14 13:54, Christoph Egger wrote: > Right something's strange on finzi. stopped the buildd there and looking > at it now Buildd finzi still mentions in recent build logs: > Toolchain package versions: [...] kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~6 (from https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=

Re: Please update buildd chroots, give back openjdk-7

2014-02-05 Thread Christoph Egger
Steven Chamberlain writes: > On 05/02/14 13:54, Christoph Egger wrote: >> Right something's strange on finzi. stopped the buildd there and looking >> at it now > > Buildd finzi still mentions in recent build logs: >> Toolchain package versions: [...] kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~6 > (from > https:/

Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing

2014-02-05 Thread YunQiang Su
在 2014年1月21日,下午9:51,Aníbal Monsalve Salazar 写道: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:43:55PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Am 16.01.2014 13:31, schrieb Aníbal Monsalve Salazar: >>> For mips/mipsel, I - fix toolchain issues together with other >>> developers at ImgTec >> >> It is nice to see such a co