On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
>> >Why is CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG to be disabled? And why was
>>
>> See the discussion in the thread before this message.
>
> I've seen no discussion of this on debian-68k or linux-m68k. What
> discussion are you referring to?
>
> The subject of
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> On 08/12/13 23:27, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Still comes with debug options enabled btw. I think this makes it noticeably
>> slower.
>
> I forgot about that. I assumed that upstream RC's would turn off the
> extra debugging, and that we'd do likewise when uploading to
On 24/12/2013 10:59, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> On 08/12/13 23:27, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> Still comes with debug options enabled btw. I think this makes it
>>> noticeably slower.
>>
>> I forgot about that. I assumed that upstream RC's would turn off the
>> extra deb
On 20/12/2013 13:23, Robert Millan wrote:
> This situation seems completely unworkable. Unless someone has a better
> idea, I'll remove radeonkms from the Debian package.
RC3 is due out soon. Is there any objection to removal of radeonkms?
If users want the non-free module, they can still install
On 21/12/2013 22:35, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 20.12.2013 18:32, Robert Millan wrote:
>> On 20/12/2013 11:05, Markus Koschany wrote:
>>> I installed 11.0~svn259528-2 from experimental. By adding drm2 and
>>> i915kms to /etc/modules I can now switch to virtual terminals and back
>>> to X and use t
Robert Millan writes:
> On 24/12/2013 10:59, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Steven Chamberlain writes:
>>> On 08/12/13 23:27, Robert Millan wrote:
Still comes with debug options enabled btw. I think this makes it
noticeably slower.
>>>
>>> I forgot about that. I assumed that upstream RC's
Upstream part is merged in their repository now. I'm attaching an update for the
Debian part (regarding kfreebsd-downloader).
--
Robert Millan
diff -ur xserver-xorg-video-ati-7.2.0/debian/control xserver-xorg-video-ati-7.2.0.new/debian/control
--- xserver-xorg-video-ati-7.2.0/debian/control 2013
Hi,
On 24/12/13 12:39, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hm might actually be that 10.0~svn259404-1 wasn't installed properly
> (though apt thinks it was)
BTW, `uname -a` now shows the Debian changelog date of the kernel you're
running (perhaps converted to UTC).
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@py
tags 731074 help
thanks
Hi,
On 01.12.2013 18:03, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> The mod-fastcgi.t test sometimes fails and sometimes succeeds on the
> kfreebsd build daemons. Please see latest build logs:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=lighttpd&arch=kfreebsd-i386
> https://buildd.debi
Steven Chamberlain writes:
>
> On 24/12/13 12:39, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Hm might actually be that 10.0~svn259404-1 wasn't installed properly
>> (though apt thinks it was)
>
> BTW, `uname -a` now shows the Debian changelog date of the kernel you're
> running (perhaps converted to UTC).
indeed.
Hi!
Arno Töll writes:
> On 01.12.2013 18:03, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> The mod-fastcgi.t test sometimes fails and sometimes succeeds on the
>> kfreebsd build daemons. Please see latest build logs:
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=lighttpd&arch=kfreebsd-i386
>> https://buildd.debi
Hi Christoph,
On 24.12.2013 14:15, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Are you both running stable kernels for the build? are you using chroots
> or not?
I use sbuild and unstable on my dev environment.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signatu
Robert Millan writes:
> On 20/12/2013 13:23, Robert Millan wrote:
>> This situation seems completely unworkable. Unless someone has a better
>> idea, I'll remove radeonkms from the Debian package.
>
> RC3 is due out soon. Is there any objection to removal of radeonkms?
>
> If users want the non-fr
Hi,
On 24/12/13 12:28, Robert Millan wrote:
> RC3 is due out soon. Is there any objection to removal of radeonkms?
If we're not doing any automatic module loading yet, I don't think there
will be any functional change from doing this? Do we gain anything by
removing it or do you suggest it only
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 22:14:00 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> My intent in _this_ thread was to get a discussion among
> debian-ports.org users started for best practices of how
> to communicate with package maintainers in Debian. Sorry
> for being unclear there. I had hoped for hints ☺ since I
Hi Steven,
I'm glad you brought this up... please bear with my reordering of your
reply, which makes it easier to make my point:
On 24/12/2013 14:33, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I seem to think the patch to the Xorg driver (#732514) is the riskiest
> change, at which point radeon will stop worki
On 24/12/2013 14:23, Christoph Egger wrote:
> AFAIK VESA still only gives a 1024x768 display?
Depends on the vga bios.
> I have been running
> radeon (without kms) on my old Thinkpad Z61m (ATI x1400) to get full
> screen resolution -- there's a huge difference between getting 1680x1080
> and 1024
Robert Millan (2013-12-24):
> Upstream part is merged in their repository now. I'm attaching an update for
> the
> Debian part (regarding kfreebsd-downloader).
>
> --
> Robert Millan
> diff -ur xserver-xorg-video-ati-7.2.0/debian/control
> xserver-xorg-video-ati-7.2.0.new/debian/control
> ---
18 matches
Mail list logo
