gcj broken?

Hi folks! gcj-dbtool-4.8 segfaults inside libgcj.so.14: #0 0x0008047a5f1f in memset () from /lib/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/libc.so.0.1 No symbol table info available. #1 0x000802692158 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/libgcj.so.14 No symbol table info available. #2 0x0008026972

Re: [call for testing] NPTL like pthread implementation for GNU/kFreeBSD

Hi Petr, Are you sure about this? /* TID of the helper thread. */ -extern __lwpid_t __helper_tid attribute_hidden; +extern pid_t __helper_tid attribute_hidden; (in kernel-posix-timers.h and timer_routines.c) lwpid_t happens to match pid_t but AFAICT they're supposed to be different things. No

Re: gcj broken?

This causes gcj-4.8-jre-headless to fail during installation and, as a result, default-jdk is currently uninstallable. Please look at libjava in Debian 4.8.1-5 http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2013/06/msg00221.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2013/06/msg00223.html Debian 4.8.1-6 http:

Processing of fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-6_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-6_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-6.dsc fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-6.debian.tar.gz fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-6_kfreebsd-amd64.deb fuse4bsd-dkms_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-6_all.deb Gree

Re: [call for testing] NPTL like pthread implementation for GNU/kFreeBSD

/* TID of the helper thread. */ -extern __lwpid_t __helper_tid attribute_hidden; +extern pid_t __helper_tid attribute_hidden; (in kernel-posix-timers.h and timer_routines.c) lwpid_t happens to match pid_t but AFAICT they're supposed to be different things. Nothing prevents upstream from eventua

fuse4bsd_0.3.9~pre1.20080208-6_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:12:13 +0200 Source: fuse4bsd Binary: fuse4bsd fuse4bsd-dkms Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64 all Version: 0.3.9~pre1.20080208-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintaine

Re: [call for testing] NPTL like pthread implementation for GNU/kFreeBSD

2013/7/13 Petr Salinger : > In theory yes, but in practice, both pid and tid are limited > to range 1 .. (2^30-1) due to other constrains in kernel. > > Moreover, even currently the TID value is in some places > (thr_exit, thr_self) passed as long. > See $SVN-glibc-bsd/glibc-ports/fbtl-misc/pid-tid

Re: [call for testing] NPTL like pthread implementation for GNU/kFreeBSD

Btw, I'm running your NPTL on my desktop (I force-fed it into a Wheezy system) and all seems fine so far. Tried iceweasel and icedove. Thanks for testing. What's your deployment plan? Is this being uploaded to experimental, or directly to sid? I am not a DD, I cannot upload anywhere. I belie

Re: [call for testing] NPTL like pthread implementation for GNU/kFreeBSD

2013/7/13 Petr Salinger : > I am not a DD, I cannot upload anywhere. > I believe it is ready as-is for experimental. > Please, could you reupload it ? Sorry I can't. You need to request this to the eglibc maintainers. May I suggest submitting a wishlist item to the BTS to keep track of this transi

Processed: Re: setproctitle(3) wanted

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 24148 libbsd Bug #24148 [libc6] libc6: setproctitle(3) wanted Bug reassigned from package 'libc6' to 'libbsd'. No longer marked as found in versions 2.0.7r-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #24148 to the same values prev