Re: Java defaults for kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:20:21PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > FYI I've had slightly more luck building this locally on kfreebsd-amd64 > with openjdk-7. I built with -j1 (to keep memory requirements low) in a debian/rules already sets -j1 for the tests explicitely, just the build is p

Re: PT_LWPINFO

2013-06-24 Thread Petr Salinger
Now that we're using LWP in LinuxThreads, is there any particular reason not to enable PT_LWPINFO in ? Im am not aware of any. Does gdb build against such header ? ptrace.h have been last synced 2009-12-21 Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject o

Re: 3D acceleration with AMD Radeon

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Millan
2013/6/24 Bruno Melo : > I wanna use kfreebsd in my laptop with Radeon HD 7300 running 3D > acceleration (like gnome shell or 0ad), is it possible with > firmware-linux-nonfree xserver-xorg-video-radeon packages? Probably. If the stock system doesn't give you 3D acceleration, you might want to try

Clang versions used in FreeBSD branches

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Millan
release/9.0.0 / clang-3.0 release/9.1.0 / clang-3.1 stable/9 / clang-3.2 head / clang-3.3 Finally I found the version number source. It was a bit hidden: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/clang/include/clang/Basic/Version.inc?view=co -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 and Clang

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Millan
2013/6/23 Sylvestre Ledru : >> I would like to ask which versions of clang are expected to be released >> with jessie? > Clearly, I cannot exactly answer to that question. > For now, there are two releases per year. > 3.3 just been released. A basic (and probably wrong) estimate could be > 3.7 [1].

Re: Enabling UFS soft updates / journalling

2013-06-24 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Steven Chamberlain wrote: The release notes for 9.0-RELEASE [3] seems to imply that UFS+SUJ became the default but I can't find evidence of the change happening in code. Note that when combined with UFS snapshots, UFS+SUJ has some problems, and on stable/9 after 9.0-rele

SIGKILL on kbsd

2013-06-24 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! If I can allocate memory with (s)brk, why do I get a SIGKILL when reading it on kbsd, but not on Linux? (see http://pastebin.com/c1dCDc9U) Thanks! -- Camm Maguirec...@maguirefamily.org =

Re: SIGKILL on kbsd

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Millan
2013/6/25 Camm Maguire : > Greetings! > > If I can allocate memory with (s)brk, why do I get a SIGKILL when > reading it on kbsd, but not on Linux? > > (see http://pastebin.com/c1dCDc9U) This doesn't say much. Can we see your sbrk() calls? Btw I vaguely recall the sbrk() syscall not being the sam