Bug#612498: open-vm-tools: Preliminary support for kfreebsd

Source: open-vm-tools Version: 2:8.8.0+2011.10.26-514583-1 Followup-For: Bug #612498 Hello, I managed to add preliminary support for kfreebsd to open-vm-tools. Placing attached patch '02-kfreebsd.patch' in debian/patches, adding the filename to debian/patches/series and adding 'libkvm-dev' to

Bug#649185: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

Package: eglibc Version: 2.13-21 With current kfreebsd-amd64 sid environment: # # Testsuite failures, someone should be working towards # fixing these! They are listed here for the purpose of # regression testing during builds. # Format: , Error [(ignored)] # annexc.out, Error 1 (ignored) check-

Bug#649196: test suite failure on kfreebsd-*: timeout in /gthread/spawn-multithreaded

Source: glib2.0 Version: 2.30.2-2 Severity: important User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org The test suite of glib2.0 2.30 reliably fails on kfreebsd-* [1]. Aside from various failing tests, the most important issue is the deadlock in /gthread/spawn-multithreaded which causes the build to be terminat

Bug#274747: type-handling: 274747: dpkg-dev dependency removal

Hi! On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 02:47:33 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jakub Wilk , 2011-11-17, 12:18: > > > Ah, thanks for the list Jakub! Is that exhaustive, against all > > > possible Provides generated by type-handling or only a selected > > > few? > > > > I believe it's exhaustive, but I'll double-c

Processing of zfsutils_8.3~svn226546-5_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

zfsutils_8.3~svn226546-5_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: zfsutils_8.3~svn226546-5.dsc zfsutils_8.3~svn226546-5.debian.tar.gz libuutil1_8.3~svn226546-5_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libuutil1-udeb_8.3~svn226546-5_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libnvpair1_8.3~svn2

zfsutils_8.3~svn226546-5_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: libnvpair1-udeb_8.3~svn226546-5_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb to main/z/zfsutils/libnvpair1-udeb_8.3~svn226546-5_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libnvpair1_8.3~svn226546-5_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/z/zfsutils/libnvpair1_8.3~svn226546-5_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libumem1-udeb_8.3~svn226546-5_kfreebsd-amd64.ude

Processing of kfreebsd-8_8.2-14_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

kfreebsd-8_8.2-14_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kfreebsd-8_8.2-14.dsc kfreebsd-8_8.2-14.debian.tar.gz kfreebsd-source-8.2_8.2-14_all.deb kfreebsd-headers-8.2-1_8.2-14_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-amd64_8.2-14_kfreebsd-amd64.deb

kfreebsd-8_8.2-14_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: kfreebsd-8_8.2-14.debian.tar.gz to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-8_8.2-14.debian.tar.gz kfreebsd-8_8.2-14.dsc to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-8_8.2-14.dsc kfreebsd-headers-8-amd64_8.2-14_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-headers-8-amd64_8.2-14_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebs

Bug#646957: marked as done ("mount -o remount,rw" has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:49:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#646957: fixed in kfreebsd-9 9.0~svn227451-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #646957, regarding "mount -o remount,rw" has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Processing of kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn227451-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn227451-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn227451-2.dsc kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn227451-2.debian.tar.gz kfreebsd-source-9.0_9.0~svn227451-2_all.deb kfreebsd-headers-9.0-0_9.0~svn227451-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebs

kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn227451-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn227451-2.debian.tar.gz to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn227451-2.debian.tar.gz kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn227451-2.dsc to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn227451-2.dsc kfreebsd-headers-9-amd64_9.0~svn227451-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-hea

netatalk 2.2.1 not starting

Hi all, I've compiled netatalk 2.2.1 with ./configure --with-bdb=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.5.2 --enable-debian to run on Debian/kFreeBSD 6.03. I have not modified the /etc/default/netatalk config file, so it is set to run afpd and cnid_metad and the netatalk script is in /etc/init.d/netatalk. My

Bug#649234: type-handling: Planned removal tracking bug

Source: type-handling Version: 0.2.23 Severity: serious Hi! This is a tracking bug report for the removal of the package, once the blocking bugs have been fixed or we decide we want to remove it regardless (ideally before wheezy is released), this can be reassigned to ftp-master for the removal f

Processed: tagging and blocking

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 587859 patch Bug #587859 [coreutils] coreutils: Please remove type-handling dependency Added tag(s) patch. > block 649234 by 587859 Bug #649234 [src:type-handling] type-handling: Planned removal tracking bug Was not blocked by any bugs. Added