Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 14.06.2011, 23:01 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> 2011/6/14 Lennart Poettering :
> > if LEGACY
> > foo_SOURCES += legacy.c
> > else
> > foo_SOURCES += netlink.c
> > endif
> >
> > In the Makefile.am file.
>
> Here.
I have applied and uploaded this patch to the Debian package.
Hi!
Am 16.06.2011 14:37, schrieb Robert Millan:
> We really need a fix for this. Is there no faster way than waiting
> for libgeom1 to pass through NEW?
Well, for a start you can ping the ftp-team to fastrack the package if
it's so important.
Best regards,
Alexander, who just did that
--
2011/6/17 Joachim Breitner :
> I have applied and uploaded this patch to the Debian package. If there
> will be a better patch that addresses the ifindex issue, I’ll be happy
> to apply that as well.
Thanks Joachim. I may have a look at improving this, though not right now.
> BTW, Lennart, I am
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:17:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#629521: fixed in freebsd-libs 8.2+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #629521,
regarding add libjail
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:17:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630107: fixed in freebsd-libs 8.2+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #630107,
regarding [kfreebsd] cannot configure grub-pc (error: cannot find a GRUB drive
for /dev/ad0s1)
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:18:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630104: fixed in kfreebsd-9 9.0~svn223109-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #630104,
regarding [kfreebsd] pstree -a: /proc/19/cmdline: Bad address
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Accepted:
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-1.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-1.dsc
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-1.dsc
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1.orig.tar.gz
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1.orig.tar.gz
libcam-dev_8.2+ds
Accepted:
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109-0.1.debian.tar.gz
to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109-0.1.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109-0.1.dsc
to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109-0.1.dsc
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109.orig.tar.gz
to main/k/kfreebsd-9/kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109.ori
Robert Millan wrote:
> kfreebsd-9 (9.0~svn223109-0.1) experimental; urgency=low
Hoorah! Thank you, Robert.
>[ Petr Salinger ]
>* Add 111_linprocfs_kthread.diff. Closes: #630104.
Thanks, Petr, too. :) "pstree -a" works now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debi
2011/6/17 Robert Millan :
>> BTW, Lennart, I am also applying the attached patch because
>> HOST_NAME_MAX does not always exist. If you could include that patch in
>> the next version as well, that would be great, as it further reduces the
>> difference to the Debian version.
>
> GNU/kFreeBSD has M
2011/6/17 Jonathan Nieder :
>> [ Petr Salinger ]
>> * Add 111_linprocfs_kthread.diff. Closes: #630104.
>
> Thanks, Petr, too. :) "pstree -a" works now.
I wouldn't consider kfreebsd-9 a solution to your linprocfs
problem, it is only barely usable yet (see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2
2011/6/17 Lennart Poettering :
> Is there any good reason why kfreebsd does not set HOST_NAME_MAX but
> MAXHOSTNAMELEN?
No.
> Fix your glibc first.
I just did. See my last mail.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
2011/6/17 Lennart Poettering :
>> I have applied and uploaded this patch to the Debian package. If there
>> will be a better patch that addresses the ifindex issue, I’ll be happy
>> to apply that as well.
>
> Hmpf. If you don't fix it nobody will.
>
> When I merged this I kinda expected you'd be pr
On Fri, 17.06.11 09:56, Joachim Breitner (nome...@debian.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 14.06.2011, 23:01 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > 2011/6/14 Lennart Poettering :
> > > if LEGACY
> > > foo_SOURCES += legacy.c
> > > else
> > > foo_SOURCES += netlink.c
> > > endif
> > >
> > > In the
Robert Millan wrote:
> I wouldn't consider kfreebsd-9 a solution to your linprocfs
> problem, it is only barely usable yet (see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/06/msg00208.html)
Let's add to that list. ;-)
lock order reversal:
1st 0xff803d300018 bufwait (bufwait) @ kern/vfs_bio.
On Fri, 17.06.11 11:16, Robert Millan (r...@debian.org) wrote:
>
> 2011/6/17 Joachim Breitner :
> > I have applied and uploaded this patch to the Debian package. If there
> > will be a better patch that addresses the ifindex issue, I’ll be happy
> > to apply that as well.
>
> Thanks Joachim. I
If you want to help getting it fixed in sid, you can test
kfreebsd-8 8.2-1.1 in experimental.
It have been reported againts 8.2-1.1 primarily ;-)
We need to make sure the GCC upgrade didn't cause any
regression before new sid uploads can be made.
Nobody objected so far, it have been availabl
2011/6/17 Jonathan Nieder :
> I'll go back to kfreebsd-8 to help the war effort. Still, it's nice
> to see something close to CURRENT is available.
Yes please. With kfreebsd-9 upload I didn't mean to draw attention
from kfreebsd-8. Testing those package is more important IMHO.
--
Robert Milla
2011/6/16 Robert Millan :
> 3) kbdcontrol is broken
>
> $ sudo kbdcontrol -l us.iso.kbd
> kbdcontrol: setting keymap: Inappropriate ioctl for device
I guess this means we need to patch a compatibility kludge in
either freebsd-utils 8.2 or kfreebsd-9. Which package should
this bug be filed on?
--
2011/6/17 Petr Salinger :
>> We need to make sure the GCC upgrade didn't cause any
>> regression before new sid uploads can be made.
>
> Nobody objected so far, it have been available for one week.
> Time to ship it into unstable ;-)
Do you think the patch in #628954 should be included? I asked
u
3) kbdcontrol is broken
$ sudo kbdcontrol -l us.iso.kbd
kbdcontrol: setting keymap: Inappropriate ioctl for device
I guess this means we need to patch a compatibility kludge in
either freebsd-utils 8.2 or kfreebsd-9. Which package should
this bug be filed on?
It seems be due to this:
http:/
Package: kfreebsd-image-9.0-0-amd64
Version: 9.0~svn223109-0.1
Severity: grave
2011/6/17 Petr Salinger :
>>> $ sudo kbdcontrol -l us.iso.kbd
>>> kbdcontrol: setting keymap: Inappropriate ioctl for device
>>
>> I guess this means we need to patch a compatibility kludge in
>> either freebsd-utils 8.
Do you think the patch in #628954 should be included? I asked
upstream if they plan to MFC it, and got no response.
I see no reason for not including it, especially, as you need it and
tested it on your machine ;-)
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:15:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630694: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #322197,
regarding OSS_GETVERSION ioctl (on /dev/mixer) fails with ENXIO
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:15:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630694: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #353302,
regarding linprocfs.ko depends on linux.ko
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:15:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630694: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #357021,
regarding provides modules that are already built in kernel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:15:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630694: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #460331,
regarding Unknown HZ value messages on kfreebsd arch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:15:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630694: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #477588,
regarding kfreebsd-7: Please switch debian/rules to SHELL=sh
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:15:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630694: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #550429,
regarding kfreebsd-7: add BOOTP kernel options for NFS Root support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:15:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630694: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #551702,
regarding kfreebsd-image-7.2-1-486: nfs locking not functional
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:15:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630694: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #559107,
regarding weaknesses in BSD PRNG algorithms
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:15:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630694: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #593699,
regarding kfreebsd-image-7.3-1-686: kfreebsd-image crash in broken ACPI
computers
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:15:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630694: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #594287,
regarding kfreebsd-7: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.3)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:15:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630694: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #601305,
regarding kfreebsd-8: pseudofs null ptr dereference exploit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
I'm wondering if it'd make sense to stop providing kfreebsd-source-*
packages. Unlike linux-source-*, figuring out how to properly use
this build system is very complicated (e.g. export PATH so that
`awk' is /usr/lib/freebsd/awk).
On Dienstag, 7. Juni 2011, Cimini Mario wrote:
> Package: general
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
kfreebsd-7 | 7.3-7 | source
kfreebsd-headers-7-486 | 7.3-7 | kfreebsd-i386
kfreebsd-headers-7-686 | 7.3-7 | kfreebsd-i386
kfreebsd-headers-7-686-smp | 7.3-7 | kfreebsd-i
Version: 7.3-7+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package kfreebsd-7 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/630694
The v
Wiadomość napisana przez Jonathan Nieder w dniu 2011-06-17, o godz. 12:01:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't consider kfreebsd-9 a solution to your linprocfs
>> problem, it is only barely usable yet (see
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/06/msg00208.html)
>
> Let's add to that list.
Hello,
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:32:38 +0200 (CEST)
Petr Salinger wrote:
> > Forcing the upgrade does not seem to break DHCP interfaces.
> > However, lo0 no longer works:
> IMHO, the best way to solve this is to have os-specific set of
> commands, which ifupdown execute.
> It would allow us to st
Hi Timo,
Here's a backport of the wireless patch to freebsd-utils 8.1 (version used
in squeeze). Hopefully this helps you getting it tested.
--
Robert Millan
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control (revision 3465)
+++ deb
Hi,
I think this bug is fixed. Recent report [1] indicates --create is working,
and I've been able to reproduce this myself in current sid (using
kfreebsd 8.2 and pbuilder 0.199+nmu4).
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/01/msg00047.html
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.199+nmu4
Severity: important
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Default setup is USEDEVFS=no which is always wrong on GNU/kFreeBSD. The
resulting environment is missing /dev/null, etc, and fails to build most
packages.
Rather than changing the defau
Hi,
Robert Millan writes:
> Here's a backport of the wireless patch to freebsd-utils 8.1 (version used
> in squeeze). Hopefully this helps you getting it tested.
Thanks. I setup a squeeze build environment but at least the attached
patch needs some tweaking:
root@debian:/build/debian/freebsd-
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:19:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#594288: fixed in kfreebsd-8 8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #594288,
regarding kfreebsd-8: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.3)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:19:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#628954: fixed in kfreebsd-8 8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #628954,
regarding if_msk driver causes kernel panic
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:19:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630104: fixed in kfreebsd-8 8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #630104,
regarding [kfreebsd] pstree -a: /proc/19/cmdline: Bad address
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:19:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630509: fixed in kfreebsd-8 8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #630509,
regarding missing conf/kern.mk conf/kmod.mk kern/vnode_if.src and
tools/vnode_if.awk, necessary for building modules
to be marked as
kfreebsd-8_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-8_8.2-2.dsc
kfreebsd-8_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-source-8.2_8.2-2_all.deb
kfreebsd-headers-8.2-1_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-amd64_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
kfre
Accepted:
kfreebsd-8_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-8_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-8_8.2-2.dsc
to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-8_8.2-2.dsc
kfreebsd-headers-8-amd64_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-headers-8-amd64_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
kfreebsd-head
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
I'm wondering if it'd make sense to stop providing kfreebsd-source-*
packages. Unlike linux-source-*, figuring out how to properly use
this build system is very complicated (e.g. export PATH so that
`awk' is /usr/lib/freebsd/awk).
Stock FreeBSD has a
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
Wiadomość napisana przez Jonathan Nieder w dniu 2011-06-17, o godz. 12:01:
Robert Millan wrote:
I wouldn't consider kfreebsd-9 a solution to your linprocfs
problem, it is only barely usable yet (see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/06
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 531167 kfreebsd-9
Bug #531167 [kfreebsd-7] Cannot boot with Xircom PCMCIA CardBus Ethernet
adapter plugged in
Bug reassigned from package 'kfreebsd-7' to 'kfreebsd-9'.
> reassign 551702 kfreebsd-9
Bug #551702 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
2011/6/17 Timo Juhani Lindfors :
> root@debian:/build/debian/freebsd-utils-8.1# patch --dry-run -p1 <
> wireless.diff
> patching file control
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 7.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 17.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file control.rej
Did you mean -p0? ;-)
--
Robert Millan
2011/6/17 Benjamin Kaduk :
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering if it'd make sense to stop providing kfreebsd-source-*
>> packages. Unlike linux-source-*, figuring out how to properly use
>> this build system is very complicated (e.g. export PATH so that
>> `awk' is /usr/
reopen 550429
reassign 550429 kfreebsd-8
thanks
as far as i know, this is still an outstanding issue for the newer versions of
kfreebsd.
live well,
vagrant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 550429
Bug #550429 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[kfreebsd-9] kfreebsd-7: add BOOTP kernel options for NFS Root support
> reassign 550429 kfreebsd-8
Bug #550429 [kfreebsd-9] kfreebsd-7: add BOOTP kernel options for NFS Root
support
Bug reas
2011/6/17 Vagrant Cascadian :
> reopen 550429
> reassign 550429 kfreebsd-8
> thanks
>
> as far as i know, this is still an outstanding issue for the newer versions of
> kfreebsd.
This problem could be solved by removing all network drivers
from kernel.
If network drivers are only built as modules
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 629543 by 629556
Bug #629543 [freebsd-utils] NFS support
Bug #549412 [freebsd-utils] freebsd-utils: fails to mount nfs: mount_nfs not
found
Was blocked by: 629562 610716
Added blocking bug(s) of 629543: 629556
Was blocked by: 629562 610716
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:22:45 +0200
with message-id
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #595041,
regarding /boot/zfs directory missing so zpool.cache is not created
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: libc0.1-dev
Version: 2.13-4
Severity: wishlist
The following syscall stub is missing. It is needed by NFS userland:
extern int nfssvc (int, void *);
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 629543 by 630843
Bug #629543 [freebsd-utils] NFS support
Bug #549412 [freebsd-utils] freebsd-utils: fails to mount nfs: mount_nfs not
found
Was blocked by: 629556 610716 629562
Added blocking bug(s) of 629543: 630843
Was blocked by: 629556
This patch is much smaller. It removes a number of kludges for bugs
that need to be fixed in other packages (see bug blockers).
--
Robert Millan
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control (revision 3467)
+++ debian/control
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
Package: kfreebsd-image-9.0-0-amd64
Version: 9.0~svn223109-0.1
Severity: grave
2011/6/17 Petr Salinger :
$ sudo kbdcontrol -l us.iso.kbd
kbdcontrol: setting keymap: Inappropriate ioctl for device
I guess this means we need to patch a compatibility kl
[removing the bug from the cc]
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/6/17 Benjamin Kaduk :
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
I'm wondering if it'd make sense to stop providing kfreebsd-source-*
packages. Unlike linux-source-*, figuring out how to properly use
this build sys
64 matches
Mail list logo
