Luca Favatella dixit:
>This patch adds ufs initrd support.
4.2FFS, UFS2, or both?
I would very much like to be able to install Debian GNU/kFreeBSD on
4.2FFS (aka UFS1) filesystems, not just UFS2.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
seconds since the
On 07/07/2009, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Luca Favatella dixit:
>
>>This patch adds ufs initrd support.
>
> 4.2FFS, UFS2, or both?
In the attached second version of the patch, I explicated UFS2.
UFS1 works too, but I chose to introduce only UFS2.
(I'll use UFS2 in kfreebsd-i386 commit in next days
Heya,
so, once hal is fixed (which should hopefully happen soon), one should
get xorg-server. Once qt4-x11 (fixed package is in NEW), one can
consider kde4libs. There's still avahi on the way, as you can see one
the attached picture, showing Build-Depends (B-D:), Depends (D:), and
binary/source re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:44:53 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #535243,
regarding kfreebsd-kernel-headers: Wrong type in ?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Hi all,
it looks like we are currently waiting for hal.
What will be the next blocker besides [1-3] ?
I believe that reschedule of all failed packages will
give us some more successful builds.
Would be possible to put somewhere files like used to be
http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/kfreebsd-i3
5 matches
Mail list logo
