Hi!
I made a 64 bit glibc build and it seems to have some trouble:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cat test.c
main ()
{
printf ("hello\n");
exit (56);
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] amd64-kfreebsd-gnu-gcc test.c -g -o test -static ; brandelf
-t FreeBSD test
test.c: In function 'main':
test.c:3: warning: incompatibl
Hi!
> I made a 64 bit glibc build and it seems to have some trouble:
Please could you:
- add headers/prototypes for printf, exit
- try it under ktrace
- try "make -k check" in glibc build
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 09:39:19AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I made a 64 bit glibc build and it seems to have some trouble:
>
> Please could you:
>
> - add headers/prototypes for printf, exit
This revealed some breakage in my headers due to a mistake during manual install
and pat
Don't ask me why, but it seems that fixing the problem in binutils (see my last
commit, binutils_elfosabi.diff) solved the segfaults.
I got hello.c to work now.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: rmh
Date: 2006-02-25 14:44:01 + (Sat, 25 Feb 2006)
New Revision: 1250
Added:
trunk/web/patches/binutils_elfosabi.diff
Log:
Add binutils_elfosabi.diff
Added: trunk/web/patches/binutils_elfosabi.diff
===
--- trunk/web/pa
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 03:56:42PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Don't ask me why, but it seems that fixing the problem in binutils (see my
> last
> commit, binutils_elfosabi.diff) solved the segfaults.
>
> I got hello.c to work now.
There, it came back.
I think to summarise, the problem is:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:45:04PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Test example:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ ./test
> argc = 1
> argv[0] = ./test
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ /tmp/test
> Usage: ld.so [OPTION]... EXECUTABLE-FILE [ARGS-FOR-PROGRAM...]
> You have invoked `ld.so', the helper program for sh
> Uhm that might be explained by ld.so being allocated in 0x0. Sounds like a
> repetition of #336496. Was this a problem in kernel, libc, binutils...?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ /lib/ld-kfreebsd-x86-64.so.1 --list /tmp//h
> libc.so.0.1 => /gnu/lib/libc.so.0.1 (0x000800117000
8 matches
Mail list logo
