Re: Sparc port

2002-10-22 Thread John Ineson
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:07:42PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: [...] > Oh, and mentions of patch locations aren't ideal now. Joel's got rather a > lot of cleaner ones in his CVS tree, Where do I find that? I can't see any reference to it in the list archives. At present, dpkg won't build becaus

re: Sparc port

2002-10-22 Thread matthew green
At present, dpkg won't build because it can't find obstack.h, which seems to be part of glibc. Is there a patch for dpkg that I need? isn't obstack part of libiberty? it appears to be from my netbsd toolchain tree.

Re: Sparc port

2002-10-22 Thread Joel Baker
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:39:21PM +0100, John Ineson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:07:42PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > [...] > > Oh, and mentions of patch locations aren't ideal now. Joel's got rather a > > lot of cleaner ones in his CVS tree, > > Where do I find that? I can't see any r

status debian/openbsd

2002-10-22 Thread Andreas Schuldei
There are several indications that openbsd's security is more or less up to the level what can be achived with todays debian gnu/linux. The kernel code seems to have severe race conditions and the userspace seems to be bitten by a compareable number of security incidents as e.g. a stabel debian wi

Re: status debian/openbsd

2002-10-22 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Andreas Schuldei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021022 23:58]: > There are several indications that openbsd's security is more or > less up to the level what can be achived with todays debian > gnu/linux. > > The kernel code seems to have severe race conditions and the > userspace seems to be bitten by a