-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Robert,
On 23.09.2011 22:26, Robert Millan wrote:
> If it is, which combinations are possible and which aren't? Currently
> I know that:
> ...
> - 9.x kernel can run with 8.x userland
are you sure? I think I found such an incompatibility.
I b
2011/9/25 Petr Salinger :
>> If it is, which combinations are possible and which aren't? Currently
>> I know that:
>>
>> - 9.x kernel can be built with 8.x buildutils
>> - 9.x kernel can run with 8.x userland
>>
>> But I don't know if the reverse are true.
>
> And that is exactly the reason for ha
Even during RC series it should stay in experimental.
And with ABI number 0?
IMHO, yes, for experimental it does not matter.
But may be it is time to consider putting into experimental also
freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-libs/freebsd-utils/kfreebsd-kernel-headers/...
I think there should be a c
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/9/23 Petr Salinger :
Even during RC series it should stay in experimental.
And with ABI number 0?
Mail on freebsd lists in the past couple days (I just read it today, but
was a bit behind) indicates that there will be ABI bumps yet before 9.0
2011/9/23 Petr Salinger :
> Even during RC series it should stay in experimental.
And with ABI number 0?
> But may be it is time to consider putting into experimental also
> freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-libs/freebsd-utils/kfreebsd-kernel-headers/...
I think there should be a clear plan wrt 8.x and
Btw, this opens a few questions. Now that 9.x has been branched:
- Should we put it in sid already?
- If we do, should we allow it to migrate to wheezy?
- Should we consider ABI stable and hence bump it to 1?
Even during RC series it should stay in experimental.
But may be it is time to consid
6 matches
Mail list logo
