Re: Bug#851053: openjdk-8-jre-headless: Can't run a command with Runtime.exec() on kfreebsd-* - errcode 127

Steven Chamberlain a écrit le 13/01/2017 à 14:43 : > Hello, > > Gilles Filippini wrote: >> While investigating about ant FTBFS on kfreebsd-* [1][2], I tried the >> very simple testcase below. It fails with errcode 127 on kfreebsd-*: > > Many thanks for the report and test case. With that I could

Re: Bug#851053: openjdk-8-jre-headless: Can't run a command with Runtime.exec() on kfreebsd-* - errcode 127

Hello, Gilles Filippini wrote: > While investigating about ant FTBFS on kfreebsd-* [1][2], I tried the > very simple testcase below. It fails with errcode 127 on kfreebsd-*: Many thanks for the report and test case. With that I could easily find the underlying issue: 31280 java CALL vfork

Re: Bug#825514: GNU/kFreeBSD patch for openjdk-8

Steven Chamberlain wrote: > I wonder though, in this context, is it referring to the kernel (so we > should return "BSD" here) or userland traits (we are actually more like > (GNU/)"LINUX"). In this context, the only difference it makes is whether to use vfork() or posix_spawn(). Linux and FreeBS

Re: Bug#825514: GNU/kFreeBSD patch for openjdk-8

Hi, Jon Boden wrote: > We had the exact same problem on ubuntuBSD and fixed it with this patch: > > https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntubsd/ubuntubsd/patches-xenial/download/jon%40ubuntubsd.org-20160613204145-fp9vhvrndudghxhj/openjdk8.diff-20160613204118-vadi6g4wfrmictbr-1/openjdk-8.di

GNU/kFreeBSD patch for openjdk-8

Hi We had the exact same problem on ubuntuBSD and fixed it with this patch: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntubsd/ubuntubsd/patches-xenial/download/jon%40ubuntubsd.org-20160613204145-fp9vhvrndudghxhj/openjdk8.diff-20160613204118-vadi6g4wfrmictbr-1/openjdk-8.diff I think it should work on

Re: openjdk-8 ftbfs again on kfreebsd

include/linux. Was this an intended change? Please either fix it, or revert it. That was not intentional, but something changed upstream that we need to patch. The attached patch hunk appended to kfreebsd-support-jdk.diff will fix this. I've tested that the resulting openjdk-8 can be used as a

Re: openjdk-8 ftbfs again on kfreebsd

an intended change? Please either fix it, or revert it. That was not intentional, but something changed upstream that we need to patch. The attached patch hunk appended to kfreebsd-support-jdk.diff will fix this. I've tested that the resulting openjdk-8 can be used as a build dependency to su

Bug#801954: openjdk-8 ftbfs again on kfreebsd

Package: src:openjdk-8 Version: 8u66-b01-6 Severity: important /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-kfreebsd-amd64/include/jni.h:45:20: fatal error: jni_md.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. the header is now included in include/bsd instead of include/linux. Was this an intended chan

Re: failed kfreebsd-amd64 build of openjdk-8 8u66-b01-4

On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 07:16:54PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi! > > Jan Henke wrote: > > the strange thing is, the buildds continue trying to install > > openjdk-8-jdk instead to satisfy the build dependency, which naturally > > fails. I assume, because the pa

Re: failed kfreebsd-amd64 build of openjdk-8 8u66-b01-4

Hi! Jan Henke wrote: > the strange thing is, the buildds continue trying to install > openjdk-8-jdk instead to satisfy the build dependency, which naturally > fails. I assume, because the package exists for most other > architectures, but not kfreebsd-*. The build-dependency is: o

Re: failed kfreebsd-amd64 build of openjdk-8 8u66-b01-4

Am 20.09.2015 um 16:21 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 20/09/2015 10:24, Jan Henke a écrit : > >> it looks like the opnejdk-8 has a bootstrap problem, since it cannot >> install the openjdk-8-jdk package (which does not exist in the archive >> yet for kfreebsd-*). >>

Re: failed kfreebsd-amd64 build of openjdk-8 8u66-b01-4

Le 20/09/2015 10:24, Jan Henke a écrit : > it looks like the opnejdk-8 has a bootstrap problem, since it cannot > install the openjdk-8-jdk package (which does not exist in the archive > yet for kfreebsd-*). > > Is it possible for someone with the access right to manually build a

Re: failed kfreebsd-amd64 build of openjdk-8 8u66-b01-4

Am 20.09.2015 um 09:45 schrieb Debian buildds: > * Source package: openjdk-8 > * Version: 8u66-b01-4 > * Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 > * State: failed > * Suite: sid > * Builder: fano.debian.org > * Build log: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openj

Re: Bug#761067: openjdk-8 kfreebsd patches need updates and upstreaming

any update on this? debian-java currently thinks about moving forward with openjdk-8.

Re: openjdk-8

Hi, Christoph Egger wrote: > Might be something kFreeBSD people are interested in talking about > during DebConf. If we want to get back into stretch we'll need java for > sure. Yeah it would be good to discuss at DebConf: * the status of getting our patches upstreamed * get

Re: openjdk-8

Am 22.06.2015 um 10:50 schrieb Christoph Egger: > Hi! > > Jan Henke writes: >> Am 22.06.2015 um 09:07 schrieb Christoph Egger: >>> I've just killed openjdk-8 builds for now. It needs itself to build >>> (might just need bootstrapping using openjdk-7 -- n

Re: openjdk-8

Hi! Jan Henke writes: > Am 22.06.2015 um 09:07 schrieb Christoph Egger: >> I've just killed openjdk-8 builds for now. It needs itself to build >> (might just need bootstrapping using openjdk-7 -- not sure) > > as far as I recall OpenJDK-7 would work for bootstrappin

Re: openjdk-8

Am 22.06.2015 um 09:07 schrieb Christoph Egger: > Hi! > > I've just killed openjdk-8 builds for now. It needs itself to build > (might just need bootstrapping using openjdk-7 -- not sure) > > Christoph > Hi Christoph, as far as I recall OpenJDK-7 would work for boots

openjdk-8

Hi! I've just killed openjdk-8 builds for now. It needs itself to build (might just need bootstrapping using openjdk-7 -- not sure) Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd

Re: Bug#761067: openjdk-8 kfreebsd patches need updates and upstreaming

On 03/19/2015 11:25 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Matthias Klose wrote: >> I forwarded this upstream. > > Many thanks for that. > > I can't find this in the bug tracker or public mailing lists, but if > they need anything before the patches can be merged, please let me know. I was told, that y

Re: Bug#761067: openjdk-8 kfreebsd patches need updates and upstreaming

Matthias Klose wrote: > I forwarded this upstream. Many thanks for that. I can't find this in the bug tracker or public mailing lists, but if they need anything before the patches can be merged, please let me know. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#761067: openjdk-8 kfreebsd patches need updates and upstreaming

Package: src:openjdk-8 Version: 8u40~b04-2 Severity: important see the buildd logs SetupNativeCompilation(BUILD_LIBATTACH) [2] LIBRARY := attach [3] OUTPUT_DIR := /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jdk/lib/amd64 [4] SRC := /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/jdk/src/solaris/native/sun/tools/attach [5] EXCLUDE_FILES := Sola

Re: Porting OpenJDK 8

Great, let me try it on mips64el. I met some trouble for openjdk-6 and openjdk-7. Wish openjdk-8 works :-) On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi, > > OpenJDK 8 is being packaged [1] and I'm looking for porters willing to > try and compile it on other arch

Porting OpenJDK 8

Hi, OpenJDK 8 is being packaged [1] and I'm looking for porters willing to try and compile it on other architectures. So far it builds fine on amd64 and some work has started for kFreeBSD. No other architecture has been tested yet, so any help is welcome. Thank you, Emmanuel Bourg [1]